Fw: [Ham-Antennas] Very Good Site for Knowledge ..

2 views
Skip to first unread message

David Tanks

unread,
Nov 1, 2025, 11:39:58 AMNov 1
to valleyhams
Good info on End-Fed Half-Wave antennas and End-Fed Off-Center
antennas.

David AD4TJ

----- Forwarded Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2025 at 11:27:04 AM EDT
Subject: Re: [Ham-Antennas] Very Good Site for Knowledge ..

On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 16:47:18 +0000, "W0LEV via groups.io"
<davearea51a=gmai...@groups.io> wrote:

>But I've been bashed and flamed
>for many of my comments.  Here it all is from another excellent source.


As many have said, they can work OK under certain conditions. But in many cases,
people wonder why the EFHW/EFLW doesn't work as well as many claim it does.

I found this to be interesting. It's taken from this part of that website:


"Key nuance: standard 49:1 EFHWs are unstable on lower bands due to soil and
height variations. However, in purpose-built Inverted-L designs with higher
ratio transformers (68:1–70:1), stability improves dramatically—showing that
transformer design and geometry matter as much as the wire itself."

It also covers the EFOC (end-fed off-center) antenna, which is more manageable
than the above. It's worth a quick read of that page. This particular part
explains why the EFHW as a multi-band antenna may not be the Holy Grail of
antennas:

=========================================
Why We Do Not Like the “Wideband EFHW”

Some commercial EFHWs are marketed as “wideband” solutions, claiming low SWR
across HF without a tuner. In reality:

The flat SWR curve often comes from lossy ferrites or resistive elements inside
the transformer. This “absorbs” mismatch rather than transferring power to the
antenna.Efficiency can be dramatically reduced—sometimes more than half the RF
power is lost as heat.

=========================================

So a good SWR, as stated in this group many times, does not mean that the
antenna is efficient. A dummy load is probably the most inefficient antenna
possible, yet it offers a 1:1 SWR.

I used an end fed multiband antenna for a few years and had a decent enough
ground system, and it did OK, but I matched it directly with a tuner, no voltage
transformer or balun.

Donald KX8K


----------------------------------------------------
Some ham radio groups you may be interested in:






David Gordon

unread,
Nov 1, 2025, 9:06:05 PMNov 1
to David Tanks, valleyhams
Interesting read. I use two EFHW antennas. One is a 40-10m and the other is an 80-10m; in an L configuration using the 49:1 unun, two ferrites each. Low swr on most bands, < 1.3:1 or better. On 75m, low swr from 3800 to 4000 kHz, but need to use my tuner from 3525 to 3800 kHz. No coil heating because I’m usually running less than 300 watts. Height for both are 20 feet. The 49:1 coils are hand wound, not store-bought. My 80-10m is N-S, and the 40-10m is E-W. 
The N-S gives me a nice side lobe into Europe on 15 and 10m, whereas the E-W gives good coverage stateside and to AK on 20m. 
Side note: my EFLW uses a 9:1 and 145.5’ of wire, gives good results on 17m, low swr. 
CP's are my coax shields, 80' to my CMC's before entering the house. No RF in shack. 

David, Kb4lci 



From: 'David Tanks' via Valley Hams <valle...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2025 11:39:52 AM
To: valleyhams <valle...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [Valley Hams] Fw: [Ham-Antennas] Very Good Site for Knowledge ..
 
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "ValleyHams" group.
To post to this group, send email to valle...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
valleyhams+...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/valleyhams?hl=en
Please do not send jokes and junk e-mail on this list - Let's use it for our various hobbies, public service, communications and any good useful information for our hobbies and Events.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Valley Hams" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to valleyhams+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/valleyhams/51354509.2393996.1762011592175%40mail.yahoo.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages