Comment on revision r117 in valgrind-variant

4 views
Skip to first unread message

valgrind...@googlecode.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2011, 8:38:30 AM10/28/11
to valgrind-var...@googlegroups.com
Comment by timur...@google.com:

General Comment:
Do we need to upstream it?
Or was it intentionally removed?

For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/valgrind-variant/source/detail?r=117

valgrind...@googlecode.com

unread,
Oct 28, 2011, 9:13:17 AM10/28/11
to valgrind-var...@googlegroups.com
Comment by ramosian...@gmail.com:

General Comment:
It was not implemented intentionally.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages