vagrant-libvirt dchp problem

[Carlos Albornoz]

Hi, I have installed vagrant-2.2.5-2 + libvirt as provider on Archlinux, when up a VM the nat network set correctly the IP, but when up a second VM, dhcp lease the same IP, with the obvious network problems for that configuration, any idea what is happens?

Cheers.

[Alvaro Miranda Aguilera]

can you share both Vagrantfiles ?

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:12 PM Carlos Albornoz <caralb...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi, I have installed vagrant-2.2.5-2 + libvirt as provider on Archlinux, when up a VM the nat network set correctly the IP, but when up a second VM, dhcp lease the same IP, with the obvious network problems for that configuration, any idea what is happens?

Cheers.

--
This mailing list is governed under the HashiCorp Community Guidelines - https://www.hashicorp.com/community-guidelines.html. Behavior in violation of those guidelines may result in your removal from this mailing list.
 
GitHub Issues: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues
IRC: #vagrant on Freenode
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vagrant" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vagrant-up+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vagrant-up/15dd3d8a-9756-4cfe-8f7a-faa868d96f72%40googlegroups.com.

--

Alvaro

[Carlos Albornoz]

Hi Alvaro,

Sure, https://pastebin.com/BkCwLEsu (is more large but essentially is that)

I think is not a configuration problem, on Debian work ok, may be dnsmasq have some issue with the dhcp.

On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 5:31:11 PM UTC-3, Alvaro Miranda Aguilera wrote:

can you share both Vagrantfiles ?

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:12 PM Carlos Albornoz <caralb...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi, I have installed vagrant-2.2.5-2 + libvirt as provider on Archlinux, when up a VM the nat network set correctly the IP, but when up a second VM, dhcp lease the same IP, with the obvious network problems for that configuration, any idea what is happens?

Cheers.

--
This mailing list is governed under the HashiCorp Community Guidelines - https://www.hashicorp.com/community-guidelines.html. Behavior in violation of those guidelines may result in your removal from this mailing list.
 
GitHub Issues: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues
IRC: #vagrant on Freenode
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vagrant" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vagra...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vagrant-up/15dd3d8a-9756-4cfe-8f7a-faa868d96f72%40googlegroups.com.

--

Alvaro

[Carlos Albornoz]

More info:

When I start the nat network "vagrant-libvirt", 2 process dnsmasq are started with the same configuration:

nobody    474777       1  0 18:20 ?        00:00:00 /usr/bin/dnsmasq --conf-file=/var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/vagrant-libvirt.conf --leasefile-ro --dhcp-script=/usr/lib/libvirt/libvirt_leaseshelper
root      474778  474777  0 18:20 ?        00:00:00 /usr/bin/dnsmasq --conf-file=/var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/vagrant-libvirt.conf --leasefile-ro --dhcp-script=/usr/lib/libvirt/libvirt_leaseshelper

Is that normal?

When start the routed network "vagrant-puppet0" (see pastebin) only 1 process is started

nobody    470306       1  0 17:55 ?        00:00:00 /usr/bin/dnsmasq --conf-file=/var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/vagrant-puppet0.conf --leasefile-ro --dhcp-script=/usr/lib/libvirt/libvirt_leaseshelper

When I see the (vagrant-libvirt) /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/virbr1.macs content is

[
  {
    "domain": "node01",
    "macs": [
      "52:54:00:5a:a3:fb"
    ]
  },
  {
    "domain": "node02",
    "macs": [
      "52:54:00:7d:b1:b8"
    ]
  },
]

But if I see the content of /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/virbr1.status (vagrant-libvirt) I see this:

[
  {
    "ip-address": "192.168.121.154",
    "mac-address": "52:54:00:7d:b1:b8",
    "hostname": "node02",
    "client-id": "ff:d7:6b:blablabla",
    "expiry-time": 1569623017
  }
]

This file should be have both configuration, I guess, but when I start node02 after node01, the node01 status is replaced by node02 status, that is ok?

Cheers.