Katie,
yes, that is a good explanation on someone's blog. It is a theory, and I can see why you are convinced, and hold herd immunity as a tenet of your belief in vaccination.
But rather than faithfully believing in a theory, is there scientific evidence available which supports herd immunity?
Regardless of herd immunity or not, should not we be able to freely consent to, or deny a vaccine, based on personal choice, considering factors such as the injecting of chemicals and toxins etc.? Or should one take the risk, in order to satisfy the demands of those who follow this theory? Should they be able to demand others be vaccinated against their will in order to support their faith? (sorry for the religious link, but it does
remind me of certain other faiths).
We all know vaccines are linked to autism, despite cries of rebuttal. The jury has spoken on this already. And people are scared. Scared that they are being bullied into the above, against their wishes.
But back to the point. Where is the scientific proof that herd immunity is more than just a theory?
Like most theories, there seems to be a gaps in this one, and room for plenty of questions, hence my inquisitiveness as to what proof is available.
I would not be here if I had already found it.
Andrew.
--------------------------------
katie