Re: [vaccination-respectful-debate] Challenge, dechallenge, rechallenge

[A MacDonald]

So, if a reaction occurred, would that be a challenge?

From: JC <jc_bi...@yahoo.com.au>
To: vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, 6 May 2013 10:41 AM
Subject: [vaccination-respectful-debate] Challenge, dechallenge, rechallenge

Hi.

Is it actually possible to test vaccination using a "challenge, dechallenge, rechallenge" technique?  It was suggested as a way of determining the side effects of vaccination.

John

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectf...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[John Cunningham]

Andrew,

It is a technique of investigation. The three go together. It was suggested that it could be used for testing vaccination. What do you think?

John

[John Cunningham]

Oh sorry I didn't realise I was referring to you, Tristan.

On 07/05/2013, at 9:30 AM, punter <trista...@hotmail.com> wrote:

No it wasn't.

 

It was suggested that we should take note of those that have already occurred in the real world as demonstrating that they do cause negative reactions. There is no need to do any more under a specific testing protocol because a) CDR doesn't quantify anything; and b) vaccines are useless anyway.

[A MacDonald]

John,

I think all investigation is good, inclusive of all considerations.

How would you investigate, including vaccines?

Andrew.

[John Cunningham]

That's not my question Andrew.