Re: [vaccination-respectful-debate] Another claim about vaccinations

[A MacDonald]

JC,

What do you think causes autism?

Andrew.

From: JC <jc_bi...@yahoo.com.au>
To: vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 4 May 2013 8:37 PM
Subject: [vaccination-respectful-debate] Another claim about vaccinations

In a recent email, Judy Wilyman has claimed, amongst other things...

"The current scientific evidence suggests it (vaccination) is the most likely cause of autism."

Really?  Does anyone else here think this?  Has no one been reading the research into autism that does not involve vaccination?

John

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectf...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[John Cunningham]

I don't know. 

There's lots if evidence about genetics and age of fatherhood. What do you think?

John

[A MacDonald]

John,

when one applies the 5-Why concept to get a root cause, vaccination certainly gets a mention.

Andrew.

[A MacDonald]

Katie,

google it.

Andrew.

From: Katie Brockie <katieb...@gmail.com>
To: vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com
Cc: A MacDonald <qldbr...@yahoo.com.au>
Sent: Wednesday, 8 May 2013 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [vaccination-respectful-debate] Another claim about vaccinations

Andrew - what is the 5-Why concept?

thanks,
Katie

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+ unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@ googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+ unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@ googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+ unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@ googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[Katie Brockie]

Andrew,

thanks for answering my question!!!

Anyway - I googled it, and it is an analysing tool which is completely unsuited to finding a root cause for autism.

K

[A MacDonald]

Katie,

Yes, totally unsuited, if you ignore what is injected into a child.

But, very apt, if one considers it as a possible cause. It's a great tool, when one learns how to use it.

No analysing tool is suitable when one has blinkers on.

Andrew.

 

From: Katie Brockie <katieb...@gmail.com>
To: Vaccination-Respectful Debate <vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [vaccination-respectful-debate] Another claim about vaccinations