John: facts.
Tristan: fantasy.
I think this there's a theme here...
Forget about our grandchildren. In 1000 years time every single history class on the planet will spend all its time wondering how on earth the public could be persuaded to offer up its children to have poisons injected into them in order to keep them "healthy". And kids in kindergarten will look at the hopelessly circular reasoning used to feed the lie and laugh.
On Tuesday, 19 March 2013 10:27:53 UTC+11, JC wrote:--"There have now been 179 cases of measles in Mid and West Wales, 55 cases in North Wales and seven cases in South East Wales. Ninety-seven of the cases in Mid and West Wales are linked to four outbreaks in the South Pembrokeshire, Llanelli, Burry Port and Neath Port Talbot areas, the other 82 are sporadic cases across seven county areas. The majority of the North Wales cases – 52 – are in the Llandudno area and are linked to outbreaks in two schools, Ysgol Ffordd Dyffryn and Ysgol John Bright, while the other three cases are sporadic cases in three counties....Vaccination rates, including for MMR, among pupils starting school are between 92% and 98% and in the first six months of 2008 there were 135 confirmed cases of measles across the US, which has a population of 300 million.In Wales the latest figures show that 83.4% of children have had two doses of MMR, although in Bridgend the figure is just 76%. There were 39 cases in Wales, which has a population of three million last year and there are more than 240 cases associated with the current outbreaks."As one of the politicians said, “Thanks to one of the most irresponsible scare stories of modern times – the completely debunked scare story that the MMR vaccine and autism are linked – we have managed in this country, through almost unprecedented collective national idiocy, to re-introduce a disease that we had all but wiped out just a few years ago.“How on earth will we be able to explain this to our grandchildren?“How will we justify letting one rogue physician, with one bankrupt report mobilise a handful of zealots and an irresponsible and bewildered media into releasing a potentially fatal disease on our nation’s children?“Yet that is exactly what we’ve done as a society.”Food for thought. Vaccination rates go down, disease goes up. Again. And yet I thought that Greg Beattie's graphs told us that the diseases were on the way out anyway? Aren't they all just naturally falling? Vaccination does nothing? And yet when vaccination rates go down, diseases reappear.“How will we justify letting one rogue physician, with one bankrupt report mobilise a handful of zealots and an irresponsible and bewildered media into releasing a potentially fatal disease on our nation’s children?
John
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectf...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/113/3/455.abstract
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23099425
Editorial Note: This outbreak demonstrates that transmission of measles can occur within a school population with a documented immunization level of 100%. This level was validated during the outbreak investigation. Previous investigations of measles outbreaks among highly immunized populations have revealed risk factors such as improper storage or handling of vaccine, vaccine administered to children under 1 year of age, use of globulin with vaccine, and use of killed virus vaccine (1-5). However, these risk factors did not adequately explain the occurrence of this outbreak.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000359.htm
Now this study is very important because it demonstrates how vaccinated children can have Measles yet not show the clinical symptoms which can lead to under reporting and overestimation of vaccine efficacy.
“A prolonged school-based outbreak of measles provided an opportunity to study "vaccine-modified" mild measles and secondary vaccine failure. Thirty-six (97%) of 37 unvaccinated patients had rash illnesses that met the Centers for Disease Control clinical case definition of measles, but 29 (15%) of 198 vaccinated patients did not, primarily because of low-grade or absent fever. Of 122 patients with seroconfirmed measles, 10 patients (all previously vaccinated) had no detectable measles-specific IgM and significantly milder illness than either vaccinated or unvaccinated patients with IgM-positive serum. Of 108 vaccinated patients with seroconfirmed measles, 17 patients (16%) had IgM-negative serology or rash illnesses that failed to meet the clinical case definition; their mean age (13 years), age at the time of vaccination, and time since vaccination did not differ from those of other vaccinated patients. The occurrence of secondary vaccine failure and vaccine-modified measles does not appear to be a major impediment to measles control in the United States but may lead to underreporting of measles cases and result in overestimation of vaccine efficacy in highly vaccinated populations.”
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=381746
Paralysis cases soar after oral polio vaccine introduced
A new report by two Delhi pediatricians suggests that the sharp rise in childhood paralysis in India is due to the increased usage of the oral polio vaccine, a drug that was banned in the U.S. over a decade ago.
http://digitaljournal.com/article/323371#ixzz211olXr1w
Mumps outbreak in Orthodox Jewish communities in the United States
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23113481
Update: Mumps Outbreak --- New York and New Jersey, June 2009--January 2010
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5905a1.htm
Mumps outbreak in Israel's highly vaccinated society: are two doses enough?
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8480501
Mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated population
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347605807267
Mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated school population. Evidence for large-scale vaccination failure.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7795768
Sustained Transmission of Mumps in a Highly Vaccinated Population: Assessment of Primary Vaccine Failure and Waning Vaccine-Induced Immunity
http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/169/1/77.short
Here is the rundown on the vaccination levels of most of the articles
*Mumps outbreak in Guam 93% of cases vaccinated
*Measles outbreak in Illinois high school 99.7% pre outbreak rate of vaccination
“Editorial Note: This outbreak demonstrates that transmission of measles can occur within a school population with a documented immunization level of 100%. This level was validated during the outbreak investigation. Previous investigations of measles outbreaks among highly immunized populations have revealed risk factors such as improper storage or handling of vaccine, vaccine administered to children under 1 year of age, use of globulin with vaccine, and use of killed virus vaccine (1-5). However, these risk factors did not adequately explain the occurrence of this outbreak”
*47500 NPAFP outbreak after polio vaccine is pretty self-explanatory
*Mumps outbreak in 2005 89% of cases were vaccinated with 1 dose and 8% were vaccinated with 2 doses so 97% of cases were vaccinated.
*Mumps outbreak 97% cases were vaccinated
*Mumps outbreak in Kansas 97% of cases were vaccinated
To me it seems that the titles accurately portray the content?
“Please, go on. You're clearly pro-vaccination.”
I am finding it hard to understand why you even said this? I thought we were talking about falling vaccination rates equaling increasing disease?
Hi.Firstly, please read articles you quote. Titles are rarely the whole story.The article on Kimberley aborigines, for example, tells us that only 67% had received at least one dose, and only 52% two doses. Not high at all by general standards. It also demonstrates that the disease was more common in the unvaccinated population, that it leads to serious health issues such as meningitis, two other issues that Greg denies. Thanks for that.For the next article, "In these 9 classrooms, 18 of 152 (12%) vaccinated students developed chickenpox, compared with 3 of 7 (43%) unvaccinated students." so being unvaccinated made you more then three times more likely to geet the disease, especially in a crowded environment like a school. Of course there will be vaccine failures. Nothing is 100%.So your papers demonstrate once more that vaccination protects. They also show that these diseases haven't magically disappeared like Greg claims they have, and that they cause serious harm.Please, go on. You're clearly pro-vaccination.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mailto:vaccination-respectful-debate%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectf...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
"Australia has a low total population whopping cough vaccination rate. "
Low compared to what? Compared to 10 years ago? 50 years ago?
"And the autism rates increase with widening diagnostic criteria, as they are doing world wide."
So there has been a change in diagnostic criteria distorting statistics on autism despite the fact that autism is, and has always been, diagnosed on symptoms. However, it is absolutely inconceivable that changes in diagnostic criteria could have distorted the statistics on so-called vaccine preventable diseases.Got it.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mailto:vaccination-respectful-debate%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
And JC's word is his bond.
On Monday, 25 March 2013 11:40:26 UTC+11, JC wrote:Andrew,No, i'm not a member of Australian Skeptics, nor do I receive any money or other type of support from any organisation, including pharmaceutical companies. None.John
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mailto:vaccination-respectful-debate%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
"And why do I object to people questioning vaccines? I don't. I object to people offering ill considered, poorly based and dangerous advice."Could you please inform us of reasons to question vaccines that you don't believe are "ill considered, poorly based and dangerous"?Or would it be fair to say that you think that any advice you disagree with on this issue is, by definition, "ill considered, poorly based and dangerous"?
On Friday, 29 March 2013 22:30:30 UTC+11, JC wrote:So Andrew are you a paid committee member of the AVN? Are you an official spokesperson of the organisation?And why do I object to people questioning vaccines? I don't. I object to people offering ill considered, poorly based and dangerous advice.John
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mailto:vaccination-respectful-debate%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vaccination-Respectful Debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaccination-respectful-debate+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to vaccination-re...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vaccination-respectful-debate?hl=en-GB.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.