Fwd: Subject: 79th IETF - Working Group/BOF Scheduling

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Tina TSOU

unread,
Aug 14, 2010, 5:46:40 AM8/14/10
to v4tov6tr...@ietf.org, v4tran...@googlegroups.com
Hi all,
Should we request a BoF for 79th IETF?
If yes, how long? What's the name?
1 meeting of 2 hours? v4tov6transition? move426?

I cc our google group. People can subscribe the IETF list now.



Begin forwarded message:

From: IETF Agenda <age...@ietf.org>
Date: August 14, 2010 3:32:11 AM GMT+08:00
To: Working Group Chairs <wgch...@ietf.org>
Subject: Subject: 79th IETF - Working Group/BOF Scheduling

-----------------------------------------------------------------
79th IETF – Beijing, China
Meeting Dates: November 7-12, 2010
Host: Tsinghua University
-----------------------------------------------------------------
IETF meetings start Monday morning and run through Friday mid-afternoon
(15:15).

We are accepting scheduling requests for all Working Groups and BOFs
starting today.  The milestones and deadlines for scheduling-related
activities are as follows:

NOTE: cutoff dates are subject to change.

•  2010-09-13 (Monday): Cutoff date for BOF proposal requests to Area
Directors at 17:00 PDT (24:00 UTC). To request a BOF, please see
instructions on Requesting a BOF.
•  2010-09-27 (Monday): Cutoff date for requests to schedule Working Group
meetings at 17:00 PDT (24:00 UTC). To request a Working Group session, use
the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool.
•  2010-09-27 (Monday): Cutoff date for Area Directors to approve BOFs at
17:00 PDT (24:00 UTC).
•  2010-10-06 (Wednesday): Preliminary agenda published for comment.
•  2010-10-11 (Monday): Cutoff date for requests to reschedule Working
Group and BOF meetings 17:00 PDT (24:00 UTC).
•  2010-10-11 (Monday): Working Group Chair approval for initial document
(Version -00) submissions appreciated by 17:00 PDT (24:00 UTC).
•  2010-10-15 (Friday): Final agenda to be published.
•  2010-10-27 (Wednesday): Draft Working Group agendas due by 17:00 PDT
(24:00 UTC), upload using IETF Meeting Materials Management Tool.
•  2010-11-01 (Monday): Revised Working Group agendas due by 17:00 PST
(01:00 Tuesday, November 03 UTC), upload using IETF Meeting Materials
Management Tool.

Submitting Requests for Working Group and BOF Sessions

Please submit requests to schedule your Working Group sessions using the
"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool," a Web-based tool for submitting all
of the information that the Secretariat requires to schedule your
sessions.

The URL for the tool is:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/cgi-bin/wg/wg_session_requester.cgi

Instructions for using the tool are available at:

http://www.ietf.org/instructions/session_request_tool_instruction.html

Please send requests to schedule your BOF sessions to age...@ietf.org.
Please include the acronym of your BOF in the subject line of the message,
and include all of the information specified in item (4) of "Requesting
Meeting Sessions at IETF Meetings" in the body.  (This document is
included below.)

Submitting Session Agendas

For the convenience of meeting attendees, we ask that you submit the
agendas for your Working Group sessions as early as possible.  Draft
Working Group agendas are due Wednesday, October 27 by 17:00 PT (24:00
UTC).  Revised Working Group agendas are due no later than Monday,
November 1 at 17:00 PT (24:00 UTC).  The proposed agenda for a BOF session
should be submitted along with your request for a session.  Please be sure
to copy your Area Director on that message.

Please submit the agendas for your Working Group sessions using the "IETF
Meeting Materials Management Tool," a Web-based tool for making your
meeting agenda, minutes, and presentation slides available to the
community before, during, and after an IETF meeting.  If you are a BOF
chair, then you may use the tool to submit a revised agenda as well as
other materials for your BOF once the BOF has been approved.

The URL for the tool is:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/cgi-bin/wg/wg_proceedings.cgi

Additional information about this tool is available at:

http://www.ietf.org/instructions/meeting_materials_tool.html

Agendas submitted via the tool will be available to the public on the
"IETF Meeting Materials" Web page as soon as they are submitted.

The URL for the "IETF 79 Meeting Materials" Web page is:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/meeting_materials.cgi?meeting_num=79

If you are a Working Group chair, then you already have accounts on the
"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool" and the "IETF Meeting Materials
Management Tool."  The same User ID and password will work for both tools.
 If you are a BOF chair who is not also a Working Group chair, then you
will be given an account on the "IETF Meeting Materials Management Tool"
when your BOF has been approved.  If you require assistance in using
either tool, or wish to report a bug, then please send a message to:
ietf-...@ietf.org.
===============================================================
For your convenience, comprehensive information on requesting meeting
sessions at IETF 79 is presented below:

1. Requests to schedule Working Group sessions should be submitted using
the "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool," a Web-based tool for submitting
all of the information required by the Secretariat to schedule your
sessions.  The URL for the tool is:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/cgi-bin/wg/wg_session_requester.cgi

Instructions for using the tool are available at:

http://www.ietf.org/instructions/session_request_tool_instruction.html

If you require an account on this tool, or assistance in using it, then
please send a message to ietf-...@ietf.org.  If you are unable to use
the tool, then you may send your request via e-mail to age...@ietf.org,
with a copy to the appropriate Area Director(s).

Requests to schedule BOF sessions must be sent to age...@ietf.org with a
copy to the appropriate Area Director(s).

When submitting a Working Group or BOF session request by e-mail, please
include the Working Group or BOF acronym in the Subject line.

2. BOFs will NOT be scheduled unless the Area Director(s) approved
request is accompanied by a BOF'S FULL NAME AND ACRONYM, AREA, CHAIR(S)
NAME(S) (given together with e-mail address(es)), AN AGENDA AND FULL
DESCRIPTION, and the information requested in (4) below. (Please read the
BOF Procedure at: http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1bof-procedures.txt before
requesting a session for a BOF.)

3. A Working Group may request either one or two sessions.  If your
Working Group requires more than two sessions, then your request must be
approved by an Area Director.  Additional sessions will be assigned, based
on availability, after Friday, October 11, 2010 at 17:00 PT (24:00 UTC),
the cut-off date for requests to reschedule a session.

4. You MUST provide the following information before a Working Group or
BOF session will be scheduled:

   a. Working Group or BOF full name with acronym in brackets:

   b. AREA under which Working Group or BOF appears:

   c. CONFLICTS you wish to avoid, please be as specific as possible:

   d. Expected Attendance:

   e. Special requests:

   f. Number of sessions:

   g. Length of session:
      - 1 hour
      - 1 1/2 hours
      - 2 hours
      - 2 1/2 hours

For more information on scheduling Working Group and BOF sessions, please
refer to RFC 2418 (BCP 25), "IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures"
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2418.txt).
===============================================================
For your convenience please find here a list of the IETF Area Directors
with their e-mail addresses:

IETF Chair
Russ Housley <hou...@vigilsec.com>

Applications Area (app)
Alexey Melnikov <alexey....@isode.com>
Peter Saint-Andre <stp...@stpeter.im>

Internet Area (int)
Jari Arkko <jari....@piuha.net>
Ralph Droms <rdrom...@gmail.com>

Operations & Management Area (ops)
Ronald Bonica <rbo...@juniper.net>
Dan Romascanu <drom...@avaya.com>

Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area (rai)
Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo....@ericsson.com>
Robert Sparks <rjsp...@nostrum.com>

Routing Area (rtg)
Stewart Bryant <stbr...@cisco.com>
Adrian Farrel <adrian...@huawei.com>

Security Area (sec)
Tim Polk <tim....@nist.gov>
Sean Turner <tur...@ieca.com>

Transport Area (tsv)
Lars Eggert <lars....@nokia.com>
David Harrington <iet...@comcast.net>
===========================================================
78th IETF Meeting Attendance Number
We currently do not have our shipment back from Maastricht so we will be
providing the numbers on a separate email.

Tina TSOU

unread,
Aug 15, 2010, 9:17:09 AM8/15/10
to Jari Arkko, v4tov6tr...@ietf.org, v4tran...@googlegroups.com
Hi Jari,
Your suggestion is very precise and practical, as you are the IPv6 guru.
Yiu acts as the editor for the problem statement I-D, Victor, Chris, Lian-Yuan, Julien, and Sheng-Yong (redirecting to Can-can) promised to input. ASAIN, what the problem is being described in their prepared materials, but what new thing might be needed from the IETF is needed to be described explicitly.
In my mind, V6OPS is the beginning, which sends the requirements to 6MAN/BEHAVE/SOFTWIRE. V4TOV6TRANSITION is the end, summarizes and applies the transition technologies to the existing network. As Sheng-Yong said, in the networks his company owns, they have solutions for v4 to v6 transition, thought they need a set of official documents from IETF, to tell the concrete steps, how these transition technologies play together well, not conflicting to each other, especially for the Day 1 of v4 existing network towards v6.
If possible, a short cycle, fast return, high effectiveness dedicated "cocktail" forum is needed. There is no code change request, if there is, it should go to the other WGs. 
On Aug 15, 2010, at 12:47 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:

I think your first order of business is to figure out what the problem is and what new thing might be needed from the IETF. In other words, you need to make a gap analysis of operational guidance documents on IPv6 transition. If you have that then its easier to determine whether (a) we just need to inform everyone better of the existing RFCs, (b) we need to write some new ones in existing forums, or (c) we need even completely new forums to talk about new very different topics.

(FWIW at least my bar for creating new working groups at this point is relatively high. The V6OPS/6MAN/BEHAVE/SOFTWIRE set of working groups seems to be a pretty broad set of working groups already.)

Jari

Tina TSOU kirjoitti:

_______________________________________________ v4tov6transition mailing list v4tov6tr...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages