ah ha

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Jonathan Bober

unread,
Aug 13, 2011, 3:15:50 PM8/13/11
to uwntr...@googlegroups.com
I figured out what was wrong with the curve of norm conductor 1476. We had the wrong ap values!  Specifically, the file at

is wrong at 2 and 3. I actually did try modifying the ap values at 2 and 3, suspecting maybe something was wrong with them, but I suppose I must have stopped before reaching the right combination of values.

We should look at this more closely to see if the "L-function" with the wrong ap values really does seem to satisfy the correct functional equation or if something else went wrong.

William Stein

unread,
Aug 13, 2011, 7:37:20 PM8/13/11
to uwntr...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

Maybe I was impatient and didn't use enough precision.   Does your dembele work with the right a_p?????   Did I also mess up the other curve we don't know?
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

Jonathan Bober

unread,
Aug 14, 2011, 12:06:39 AM8/14/11
to uwntr...@googlegroups.com
Yes, the code works with the correct a_p. This will "re-find" the 1476 in a few minutes:

sage: from psage.modform.hilbert.sqrt5.ellcurve import *
sage: E = EllipticCurve([1,-a-1,a+1, 3904*a-6577, 53806*a-88477])
sage: E2 = find_curve_from_Lfunction(E.conductor(), compute_aplist(E, 30000), 30000, 1, limit1=3, limit2=(0,20), limit3=(0,5), ncpus=12, verbose=1)
[...]

The other curve we don't know looks pretty good, though. The periods look good, but it just doesn't find the curve. I'm going to look at it for a few minutes right now
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages