I would think everything except the last lecture would be covered...
Don't take my word for it though.
Michael
On 8/11/11 10:29 PM, Michael Terry wrote:
> It covers everything except the "Mike's Rules" bit on the last lecture.
> But certainly HCI research tidbits that intersect and reinforce concepts
> taught in previous lectures would be fair game from that lecture.
>
> Michael
>
> On 8/11/11 7:27 PM, Paolo P wrote:
Michael
On 8/11/11 7:27 PM, Paolo P wrote:
I better not have to write a negative review of this exam at the end, sir...
Michael
I would argue that UI should be non-cumulative...
I bet the answer will be "every topic is equally likely" though =)
In considering lecture content, ask yourself what the larger message is
in each lecture; ask yourself what would be useful to know outside of
class; and ask yourself what theoretical constructs frame the lecture
content. And recall what I said would definitely be on the exam.
Michael
Fair enough, sir, fair enough.
Btw, is it possible to get our marks for the latest assignments if we
were to email you or one of the TAs?
Michael
Sir, you really think I have time to get away from my books? Two exams
in a row on Saturday...
Michael
You're incredibly rude. Just saying. Everyone has exams.
I fail to see a problem, the professor informed me of a pickup time and
I indicated that I would not be able to make it due to massive amounts
of cramming for my two finals.
P.S. You're supposed to use your uwaterloo id as the email associated
with the account ;)
It's not what you're trying to say, it's how you say it.
You speak as though you are entitled to getting your assignments back
at anytime you wish, and anytime that the professor offers that is
unsuitable for you is absolutely absurd.
I'm not referring to only this one post. A good portion of them
throughout the term show poor mannerisms. No one likes a know-it-all
and no one likes to be patronized. Choice of tone is very important
when communicating through the Internet, and it's very easy for people
to misinterpret how you're trying to say something. People can and
will get offended, and will think that you are being disrespectful or
rude.
I hope you understand what I'm trying to get at. Thanks.
Good luck on the exam.
As someone who didn't do very well in this course, and who was often
frustrated and intimidated by people posting higher-level comments, I
can appreciate you trying to take a seemingly arrogant poster down a
peg. But using the name "TrollDestroyer2" makes you seem less a noble
defender of the common student, more someone trying to feel superior
while hiding in a dark corner of their room. This is a student
newsgroups, for students. If you cannot show you are a student by
posting from your uwaterloo email account, please do not post.
- kfarnwor
Maybe Troll Destroyer is Prof. Terry
That would be quite the revelation...