Re: another question
0 views
Skip to first unread message
William Stein
Nov 4, 2007, 1:47:58 AM11/4/07
to uw-...@groups.google.com
On 11/3/07, Daniel Finkel <dfi...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> Is it all right to prove 2.b.ii and then refer to it to prove 2.b.i, or
> would you like a separate proof that I+J
> is a fractional ideal?
> Is it all right to prove 2.b.ii and then refer to it to prove 2.b.i, or
> would you like a separate proof that I+J
> is a fractional ideal?
Yes, it's fine to prove part 2 and use that to deduce 1.
-- William
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages