interdisciplinary hypotheses

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Felix

unread,
Apr 25, 2009, 10:47:05 AM4/25/09
to UVM Interdisciplinary methods
Patrick- thanks for started the anticipated sections. I am not doing
a section on variables so it really isn't up to me, but brainstorming-
Rebecca brought it up before- seems we have panarchy to "tie it
together", but due to the breaking up of sections as a group project
the three fields of study are strongly separated.

Should we have a hypothesis specifically over the interdisciplinary
dynamics (ie- high ecological resiliency will be correlated with
strong social networking and a diverse local employment).

Or does Panarchy say it indirectly and that is just enough?

Or is it almost May and we just don't care because the sun is shining
and the computer just looks that much duller...
Felix

akbi...@aol.com

unread,
Apr 25, 2009, 11:16:52 AM4/25/09
to UVM Interdisciplinary methods
ah yes felix, I just bought a canoe and I'm done looking at this
screen for now!!!! yahoo!

(although I like the interdisciplanary hypothesis and should be easy
enough to come up with a few!)

Michele Romolini

unread,
Apr 25, 2009, 11:47:29 AM4/25/09
to uvm-interdisci...@googlegroups.com
I think it's a good idea too...

I also am thinking about deleting the list of hypotheses that I've
created for each stage. Not sure how useful they are/if they make any
sense.

That said, I might have to abandon work and lie on the beach for the
rest of the afternoon.

Katie Goodall

unread,
Apr 25, 2009, 2:02:17 PM4/25/09
to uvm-interdisci...@googlegroups.com
Hey guys,

I bought a road bike! Lee came on down to the swap and helped me test 'er out. She's a blue beaute, from the eighties, and was only $40! Wow. I kind of can't stop smiling.

Now that I've had a little time in the sun I can look over this monster for a bit while Patrick is canoeing, Romolini is basking, and Felix is shaking down to jazzfest. I like Felix's idea about actually joining disciplines within hypotheses (gasp!). Michele, you have a good point about our hypotheses as they are. It's strange Morgan asked for null hypotheses...that makes them all kinda lame. Still, I think this beast seems to be working out nicely.

I'm in my kitchen, Great Lakes Swimmers crooning, open windows...yum.
Enjoy the weather, and I'll holler in a bit.

-Goods

Katie Goodall

unread,
Apr 25, 2009, 4:21:57 PM4/25/09
to uvm-interdisci...@googlegroups.com

Hi guys,

 

Posted 10. I added a flowchart and a bit on nested sampling for your mom.

 

-Goods

Michele Romolini

unread,
Apr 25, 2009, 6:04:20 PM4/25/09
to uvm-interdisci...@googlegroups.com
My mom loves the flowchart.

11 is up. Mostly just formatting stuff... and I fixed up the
references a bit. For the hypotheses section, we need an economic null
hypothesis and we also need to decide what to do about listing the
hypotheses out by stage. I think we should do all or nothing, as the
social capital looks sad dangling out there all alone.

I think it's looking good!!!

2009/4/25 Katie Goodall <katherin...@gmail.com>:

leeh...@gmail.com

unread,
Apr 25, 2009, 9:34:55 PM4/25/09
to UVM Interdisciplinary methods
Ok folks - I added a Ho for the economics section and made a few
edits. I don't see a need for individual hypothesis.
Also, I noticed we use varying terms to describe the same:
revitalization, recovery, restoration.
Oh how the Sun both gives and takes my energy. A peaceful evening to
all, Lee

On Apr 25, 6:04 pm, Michele Romolini <mromol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My mom loves the flowchart.
>
> 11 is up. Mostly just formatting stuff... and I fixed up the
> references a bit. For the hypotheses section, we need an economic null
> hypothesis and we also need to decide what to do about listing the
> hypotheses out by stage. I think we should do all or nothing, as the
> social capital looks sad dangling out there all alone.
>
> I think it's looking good!!!
>
> 2009/4/25 Katie Goodall <katherinegood...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi guys,
>
> > Posted 10. I added a flowchart and a bit on nested sampling for your mom.
>
> > -Goods
>
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Katie Goodall <katherinegood...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Hey guys,
>
> >> I bought a road bike! Lee came on down to the swap and helped me test 'er
> >> out. She's a blue beaute, from the eighties, and was only $40! Wow. I kind
> >> of can't stop smiling.
>
> >> Now that I've had a little time in the sun I can look over this monster
> >> for a bit while Patrick is canoeing, Romolini is basking, and Felix is
> >> shaking down to jazzfest. I like Felix's idea about actually joining
> >> disciplines within hypotheses (gasp!). Michele, you have a good point about
> >> our hypotheses as they are. It's strange Morgan asked for null
> >> hypotheses...that makes them all kinda lame. Still, I think this beast seems
> >> to be working out nicely.
>
> >> I'm in my kitchen, Great Lakes Swimmers crooning, open windows...yum.
> >> Enjoy the weather, and I'll holler in a bit.
>
> >> -Goods
>
> >> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Michele Romolini <mromol...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> I think it's a good idea too...
>
> >>> I also am thinking about deleting the list of hypotheses that I've
> >>> created for each stage. Not sure how useful they are/if they make any
> >>> sense.
>
> >>> That said, I might have to abandon work and lie on the beach for the
> >>> rest of the afternoon.
>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages