The first time I fell in love with the idea of falling in love, I had a mills and boon novel in my hands. These books depicted what perfect love looked like. They made me, and almost every girl I knew who read them warm and fuzzy inside. It was an introduction to a world we were too young to experience, yet impressionable enough to look forward to. The happy endings were all that mattered as I raced through every story to the end of the novel. I wanted to read about the declaration of love, the moment it happened and the acceptance of it. But I did not know that for most of my teenage years, these books would inform my approach to relationships.
A couple of weeks ago, I was speaking with a friend about my teenage life, expectations and relationships, and somehow, mills and boon books popped up in our conversation. With nostalgia in my tone, I shared how these books were perfect for old soul romantics who love chivalry and a good dose of thoughtful romance. I shared about how these books inspired me to seek romantic relationships and helped me develop love interests as a teenager. As I write this now, I realize that in itself was probably problematic but at the time of this conversation, the idea that these books inspired a teenager to actively seek romantic relationships was not the thought that stopped me in my tracks.
Something unexpected dawned on me as I dreamily rambled on about these books, and it did not have the nostalgic, exciting effect I had when the conversation first started. If anything, I was scared as the realization hit me. Mills and Boon did not just arouse the desire for romantic relationships in me and many other young girls I knew. It aroused the desire for toxic romantic relationships.
As I spoke with my friend two weeks ago, I realized that these books may have conditioned many women, including me, into believing toxic relationships where men pay a lot of attention on one day, and totally ignore our presence the next day is normal. They have planted seeds in the minds of women to make them believe that men who act aloof or ignore them after an encounter are simply battling their emotions and are not good at expressing what they feel to the women they desire. It creates the idea, in the minds of impressionable young girls that being ignored by a man who seemed to desire them is not enough reason to let go of him. A man who ignores you after leading you on is not a man you should cut off. Instead, the man is painted as one who is fighting personal demons when in reality, that is not the case. Many men who lead women on only to ignore them later are really not fighting any demons to be with said women. They are simply uninterested and in some cases, have moved on to new pursuits.
But, due to conditioning, which I do not place solely on the shoulders on mills and boon novels, many women tend to believe these men will be back. They await the day he is vulnerable with them and the tears-inducing declaration of love that will lead them to happily ever after. Sadly, for many, those days never come.
I had a bunch of thoughts about this drama. Although this is about 100 years of romance from M&B, it basically trades in the same stereotypes and clichs about what romance is, who the readers are, and who the authors are, mostly based on cliches from Old Skool books which are mostly irrelevant to M&B circa 2008.
In all, I found this drama incredibly frustrating. This was an opportunity to say something new and interesting about M&B today, and instead it flopped back into lazy clichs about romance which betrayed a complete lack of genuine curiosity or interest about the subject.
That sounds dreadful and misogynistic. Which is dismally what I would expect from a depiction of romance novel publishing. Since clearly what scares the patriarchy is women, particularly ones who read books, have agency and thoughts.
I remember catching a bit of this on TV back in 2008 and thinking it was a pretty poor offering, especially the lecturer storyline ending. The bbc do lots of great stuff, (the 90s Pride and Prejudice is bbc) but they do occasionally naff it up.
I guess it reflects the stigma and embarrassment around mills and boon (which is totally synonymous with romance in the uk, Avon, pocket etc really hardly have any presence compared to m&b in then he uk).
We are independent media, and we depend on support from our community. Your support for the work we do here means that we can help you find more books to love.Some of the easiest ways to support us are free, and all of them are easy!If you ever want suggestions of ways to support us, visit our support page.
c80f0f1006