Find Min Value In Array In C

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Eliz Mettert

unread,
Aug 3, 2024, 4:48:59 PM8/3/24
to utvecurto

The find() method of Array instances returns the first element in the provided array that satisfies the provided testing function. If no values satisfy the testing function, undefined is returned.

A function to execute for each element in the array. It should return a truthy value to indicate a matching element has been found, and a falsy value otherwise. The function is called with the following arguments:

The find() method is an iterative method. It calls a provided callbackFn function once for each element in an array in ascending-index order, until callbackFn returns a truthy value. find() then returns that element and stops iterating through the array. If callbackFn never returns a truthy value, find() returns undefined. Read the iterative methods section for more information about how these methods work in general.

The array argument is useful if you want to access another element in the array, especially when you don't have an existing variable that refers to the array. The following example first uses filter() to extract the positive values and then uses find() to find the first element that is less than its neighbors.

\n The find() method of Array instances returns the first element in the provided array that satisfies the provided testing function.\n If no values satisfy the testing function, undefined is returned.\n

Using Array#select will give you an array of elements that meet the criteria. But if you're looking for a way of getting the element out of the array that meets your criteria, Enumerable#detect would be a better way to go:

I know this question has already been answered, but I came here looking for a way to filter elements in an Array based on some criteria. So here is my solution example: using select, I find all constants in Class that start with "RUBY_"

I am having a curve and I need a starting tangent of it, but random amount of values at start are useless so I need to find threshold, where the actual curve begins. For that purpose I built an array of the measured values and tried to find first value greater than certain number and it's index. I tried several ways to do that posted here on forum, but with no success.

The array can contain quiet a lot of active quests, which is, why I was worrying about performance. But I guess I should not mind this too much.
And thank you for explaining what the find() method does

In JavaScript, you will often be working with data that is stored in Arrays. A common task will be searching the array to find if it contains a value (or values) that satisfies certain search criteria. Depending on the task at hand, you may be interested in a boolean value for confirmation, an index for the position of the value in the array, or a separate array containing all the search results.

Prior to ECMAScript 6, you probably would have used a for loop to iterate through all the items in the array and perform operations on each item. Now there are several built-in utility methods that solve some of the common tasks for searching for values in an array.

The first parameter, valueToFind, is the value to match in the array. The second parameter, fromIndex, is optional and sets the index from which to begin comparisons. The default is 0, so the entire array is searched.

Note: If you are not seeking the first result, you may wish to use lastIndexOf(). This method is similar to indexOf, but will find the first match starting at the last index of the array and working backward.

80 is a numeric value. "rounded snout" is 13 characters long. "thick scales" is 12 characters long and "4 foot tail" is 11 characters long - both satisfy the conditions of the function. However, find() will only return the first value, so "thick scales" will be returned.

This assumes you have a modern dynamic array version of Excel which is gradually being rolled out to Office 365 users. At a more specific level it assumes the source data is held in an Excel Table (so that it resizes as data is added and provides structured references). The other table needs to be a simple range but with defined Names to identify the data.

The XLOOKUP function is intended to replace virtually all existing lookup strategies. Since 'Name' is a multicell range the function will return the entire column of results as a dynamic range. XLOOKUP defaults to an exact match and the 4th parameter is the value to return when the lookup value (name) is not found. It may be as simple as a blank (as here) or could be an entirely separate calculation such as a lookup to an alternative table.

dave, as @Peter Bartholomew suggested that could be XLOOKUP on most modern Excel or more traditional VLOOKUP or INDEX/MATCH. The question is are your lists in different worksheets in one workbook or they are in separate workbooks?

@SergeiBaklan Thank you both for your help. I will have to look at the XLOOKUP, I am not familiar with it yet. I am using office 365 at work and I assume that it is the latest version but I am not 100% sure that it has the update that was mentioned.

I have the raw data with names and sales totals in Sheet 1 and my matching list is in Sheet 2. The reason the names in the list are different is that some employees are no longer with the company and there are some new ones.

My guess is that a corporate license is most likely on semi-annual update and you would need IT intervention if you were to be set up to evaluate dynamic array solutions. @SergeiBaklan will be able to advise further on this.

Without dynamic arrays, I personally would use a Table for the report as well as the source data so that your formulas are readable and propagate to fill the entire field (note: this is not the traditional way of working and has only been available since 2007)

However, both have no Dynamic Arrays. So far DA is only for Insiders Fast and on Monthly Targeted channel (aka Insiders Slow). Recently DA was deployed for Excel Online, but Microsoft removed it back, something went wrong. I don't know what are Microsoft plans, but expect general availability of Dynamic Arrays in an year or so, more close to next Christmas.

Finding a value in an array is an important task in programming and data analysis. It involves searching for a specific element within a collection of data stored in an array. This is useful when you need to locate a particular value, check for duplicates, sort data or perform statistical calculations.

Currently the only real issue I am having is to figure out the equivilant find and find next method in Inventor. I assume there is a way to search through an arrray and keep only the values that match.

For questions like "how to search best in an array", it's easier to get response in a general website than here like stackoverflow. If you have a real Inventor related question, it's more likely you get an answer here.

There are several columns in this excel spreadsheet that I need to be able to search from, for example, W6 throughW59. As you can see there are gaps, and there could or could not be gaps or skipped rows in the file.

So, I need to be able to search all the column W and find only the relevant information. In Excel, there is a FInd function ( I attempted to reference the Excel Object collection, but does not appear to be working the way I think). The code shown will find the coils that start with ADT, then place them into a second array.

Unfortunately, the way we design, there is not a standard format for using this worksheet, so I need a way to grab the relevant information, then plug it into the parameters. I wish I could just make one cell value drive one parameter, that would make life super easy!

So, Using Inventor, I figured I can dim an array(ormultivaluelist) of the all the column values. Then I need to be able to count my ADT coils and LET coils, then I need to supply the quantity of the ADT, LET to two different parameters that drive two different part files.

I showed the code because it works and it does what I want. However, when I move it into Inventor the functions, or methods of Find and FindNext do not work. And of course i have to take out the Set and the Sub and make slight translations.

The code I am attempting to recreate in Inventor is what is in the initial post. The following code is where I am currently. Not far I admit, but the previous questions has been stumping me for awhile.

The call to MultiValue.List is setting the available values for an Inventor Parameter named DesignModel. The default iLogic snippets for Excel are for interacting with Inventor Parameters and Excel. I am not sure if you are trying to use iLogic snippets for general Excel access. I changed the cells that were being retrieved so there were less available values for the DesignModel parameter. (W6,W17 instead of W6,W50) Screenshot below to help explain.

At the end of the ADT sort you will see a list of parameters that need the corresponding values. They are commented out because they do not talk to Inventor at this moment. As you step through the code you can see the different arrays being generated with the accurate number of evaps, and no repeats.

c80f0f1006
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages