Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Exam 3 grades

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Cara Stockham Kenny

unread,
May 10, 2005, 4:56:38 PM5/10/05
to
Hi everyone,

The grades for exam 3 are on eGradebook. Here's the statistics by section:

McKinley: avg. = 58.43, std. dev. = 15.02

Witchel: avg. = 53.89, std. dev. = 13.35

Cara

Adrian Kubala

unread,
May 10, 2005, 5:30:30 PM5/10/05
to
Cara Stockham Kenny <crs...@cs.utexas.edu> schrieb:

> McKinley: avg. = 58.43, std. dev. = 15.02
> Witchel: avg. = 53.89, std. dev. = 13.35

Here's my reaction:
http://sixfingeredman.net/tmp/foo.wav

Murat Deligonul

unread,
May 10, 2005, 6:28:15 PM5/10/05
to Cara Stockham Kenny

Can we come by sometime to see our tests?

Murat

Faiz Burney

unread,
May 10, 2005, 6:27:06 PM5/10/05
to
Why is witchel section avg always low...
Can i switch sections... please witchel..

Eric Tschetter

unread,
May 10, 2005, 6:39:37 PM5/10/05
to
> Why is witchel section avg always low...
> Can i switch sections... please witchel..

It would be interesting to run a t-test or something on the distributions
from the two classes and see if the constant 2-3 point difference in mean is
merely an anomaly or actually statistically significant...

That said, what was the highest score for each section?

--Eric


Andrew K

unread,
May 10, 2005, 7:17:33 PM5/10/05
to
When can we expect final grades to be computed and sent out to us?

"Cara Stockham Kenny" <crs...@cs.utexas.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.62.05...@galley.cs.utexas.edu...

Cara Stockham Kenny

unread,
May 10, 2005, 7:27:39 PM5/10/05
to
The highest (undergraduate) score for McKinley's section is 81. The
highest for Witchel's is 83.

Cara

Joshua Shanks

unread,
May 10, 2005, 8:42:02 PM5/10/05
to
can we know the answer to question 4?

Josh.

Emmett Witchel

unread,
May 16, 2005, 12:58:30 AM5/16/05
to

My section has 49 students, while McKinley's has 37. I think that is the reason.

Emmett

Emmett Witchel

unread,
May 18, 2005, 12:20:54 PM5/18/05
to

Sure, come by my office.

Emmett

On Tue, 10 May 2005 19:42:02 -0500, Joshua Shanks <jjsh...@cs.utexas.edu>
wrote:

0 new messages