Hi everyone, hope things have calmed down a bit. Here are some of my thoughts on outlining & finals. As always, Travis and I are here anytime if you guys have any concerns- there are no stupid questions!! We both stumbled through this last year. Please use us, your writing fellows, your ASIST tutors, etc. as resources. I've attached my outlines, but keep in mind that we had different professors. We will try our best to find outlines for your professors, but it can be tricky.
Outlining is as intuitive as it sounds -- it's not a special law school
secret. But, the purpose of an outline here is distinct in that the
process of outlining is much more important than the final product.
My process
I spent a lot of time thinking about
how
to organize my outlines. The class syllabus is a good place to start,
but sometimes it makes more sense to organize outlines differently
(chronologically, by subject clusters, etc). This is really important-
don't discount it. It's helpful to look at other outlines for helpful
and unhelpful examples.
In terms of actually writing my outlines, I spent the bulk of my
time combining all my materials -- class notes, reading notes, case
briefs, and information from supplements (more on this later). I created
a super outline that was very, very long and from there, I outlined
from
my original outline. This is what we mean by the process of outlining. I
was always combining info, eliminating redundant info, and cutting more
and more from my original outline. Start with as much as possible and
as you become familiar with your outline, you'll naturally cut out
things you don't need.
I know details of cases seem important now, but once you think about
the structure and purpose of law school exams, you'll start reducing
case details in your outlines to the bare bones- just
how you can use the cases, not what happened in them.
I ended up with several versions of my outlines, each shorter than
the previous. I found it more helpful to make charts and tables than to
use the formal outlining structure. Don't be afraid to break things up
into manageable chunks or lists -- in fact, checklists were the most
helpful thing to me during my exams. BUT, you can't make a good
checklist until you make your outlines.
Law school exams
A
brief note on law school exams- they are NOT like your undergrad exams!
You'll essentially get a long story ("fact pattern") that presents a
series of legal issues. Your job will be to find the potential legal
problems ("issue spotting") and resolve them in a particular way (the
prompt will often tell you to pick a side as a clerk or an associate).
So, regurgitating case briefs or rules will be totally unhelpful. You'll really need to understand
how to use facts or rules to support your arguments. This seems very vague, but there's no traditional answer to these tests.
Try to outline in a way that helps you argue your point. As you go
through the class, make a note of particular conflicting rules or
undecided law. Professors will seize on ambiguities in the law to use
for the test- the issues will be complex and nuanced with many potential
arguments. They'll often be based on facts from real cases but with a
twist, so knowing how cases turn on certain specific facts can be
important when you use them during the test by analogizing or
distinguishing.
Lastly, pay attention to the professor! Notice
when they care about developments in the law and
when
they argue against cases. If they think something was decided wrong,
highlight that! It can be easy to predict what a professor will test you
on based on what they care about. Our contracts professor cared about
the difference between UCC and common law, our Civpro professor cared a
lot about revisions in the FRCP, etc.
Supplements
I
personally found supplements to be very helpful for Civpro, but not for
Torts and Contracts. It depends a lot on your professor. You can often
ask your professor which supplements they suggest. The E&E for
Civpro was amazing, as well as Acing Civil Procedure.
You should NOT wait until the last second to use these. Beware
extraneous information -- professors will skip a lot of things included
in the supplement. Use supplements carefully and strategically. It's
always helpful to hear things described in different ways and they'll
clarify
how to use the information you're being presented with.
If you guys want to check them out, I can bring in all of mine and you
can flip through them.
Recommended next steps
Don't
start outlining in a panic. The more thought you put into the process,
the less time you'll waste and the more useful your effort will be. As
you start finishing subject blocks in your classes, start collecting
your materials. It's much better to work with too much information than
with too little -- you don't want to spend November going back and
re-doing work. You want to have a good enough basis in the information
to start looking at supplements and thinking broadly about the course.
- Start scanning other outlines for good/bad examples of how to think about your outline
- Keep track of all your different notes
- Keep a word doc of questions you have as you start going through your materials
- Keep a word doc of times when your prof really seems to care about
something or spends a disproportionate amount of time pointing something
out
- Start tackling confusing topics with supplements, talk
things out with your classmates, see how different outlines deal with
them.
Final notes
This
is an individualized process where you should use other people's
examples as a starting point. Yes, it's possible to make an outline by
frankenstein-ing other outlines, but from personal experience, it's best
to undertake this very time-consuming and overwhelming process
yourself. Use other outlines, but don't rely on them. Think broadly,
don't panic. You will all be fine!!
--
Marysa Lin
J.D. Candidate, 2013
University of Southern California
Gould School of Law
B.A., Tufts University, 2010
marysa....@lawmail.usc.edu