The cost of an online trial is negligible for both the organizers
and the participants, and if it is not, BBO can make it so.
As Greg H. points out, security can be dealt with. Security at an
adequately proctored online trial can be far tighter than security at a
physical event. Consider this in the light of recent events.
One issue that gets inadequate airplay is accessibility of the Trials.
Perhaps an online trial, by virtue of convenience, cost, vacation time, ease
of entry would inject some fresh blood into the event.
For a pro, for a sponsor, these events are opportunities. For amateurs,
bridge is a pastime. A typical Trial involves an open return ticket,
hotel reservations of indeterminate length, vacation time, being away from
home for extended periods. None of these expenses are tax deductible for
amateurs, and no one pays them to show up.
Perhaps we should consider attempting to service our amateurs to some
larger extent than we usually do, by having *one* Trial, in *one* year, for
*one* mixed event be somewhat amateur-friendly. Making the Trials easy
and inexpensive would be a step in the right direction.
Not even I dispute that an online Trial would bring with it new some
kinks and oddities, and lose some old ones. We're all bridge players, and we
breathe both in with every breath at every NABC; surely we can handle the
trauma of seriously considering an online venue this one time.
If and when we do that, we can list any issues and attempt to address
them individually. Of course, "I just don't like that online thing" is
difficult to address. However, it is possible that cutting loose the players
who are unwilling to adapt and embracing the open-minded will lead to a large
net gain in attendance, and just perhaps, in quality.
Uday Ivatury