very strange article

[agent yo'range]

Researchers make shocking discovery after studying farmland treated
only with organic fertilizers for years: 'Emphasized the need for
major changes'

as written we cant figure out if they are saying organic fertilizer is
good or bad

the wording is very very weird

maybe they are saying that organic fertizer give 150% to 250% better
yields than chemical fertilizers - maybe they are not saying that -
the wording is very weird if you look at it closely

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/researchers-make-shocking-discovery-after-studying-farmland-treated-only-with-organic-fertilizers-for-years-emphasized-the-need-for-major-changes/ar-AA1P5fvT

for example - To contrast their yields, the researchers tended to
crops not treated with organic fertilizers. Their findings were
compelling. "tended to crops" - what does that mean exactly?

or this - Its authors concluded that even partial substitutions for
organic fertilizers would "improve soil fertility and crop
productivity while mitigating [nitrous oxide] emissions in wheat-maize
rotation systems." - do they mean 'partial substitutions WITH or BY
organic fertilizers'

seems like this was written by AI that was ESL