I don’t mean to disrespect anyone, and I don’t think I would if I
refer my readers interested in his profile and trajectory to
Google-search the name Nimi Wariboko. That would be too much of a labor
for the real reason of this exercise, which is already a cumbersome one
that is hard to filter for the substance it weighs. Besides, some couple
of weeks back, I wrote an op-ed where I extolled the contributions of
this erudite figure. I have chosen to describe him as an erudite figure
of intellectuality—a term which itself embodies an intricate web of
structured realities—not because I’m not aware of his means of survival,
but because of the pattern of his career growth as a scholar and
knowledge production that exceeds the boundaries of any known academic
culture.
Sometime in the fall of 2017, after the shock of our academic culture
and knowledge systems had struck me hard like a torpedo dropped on a
ship, but in lieu of sinking with the drowning, I was rescued by the
ideas of the likes of Wariboko. It occurred to me at this time that the
paradigms of research and knowledge increasingly coming out of Africa,
Nigeria especially, were losing focus on the micro aspect of our society
to project onto the world and produce original thoughts, ideas, and
theories. The unconscious drift of our social sciences into the
immersion of African realities into western epistemologies was palpable
in many of the theses, dissertations, journal articles and book
manuscripts I happened to review at this time. Let me be clear that this
is not a new issue in the (global) African academe; if anything, this
structure was birthed in it and has been consistent in reversing this
trend. What is, however, different at this time is that, it seems we
were losing this latter tradition informed by the works of the likes of
Kenneth Dike, Joe Alagoa, Bala Usman, Adiele Afigbo, Ade Ajayi, Achille
Mbebe, Kwasi Wiredu and Ngugi wa Thiong’o, just to mention a few these
pioneers.
Further, in the face of present contradictions and mutual suspicion that
characterize the Nigerian state, can the government be trusted to be
deeply involved in the administration of these churches? In this place
of abnormality where there is a thin line between possibility and
impossibility, Ogboin and Adelakun adopted Wariboko’s “Logic of
Invisibility” to interrogate the common imaginary space where politics
and Pentecostalism reside in Nigeria. The implication of this is that
the tool of invisibility that shrouds sovereignty in mystification,
adopted and mastered by the two entities, have been responsible for the “Post-colonial Incredibles.”
If anything, is it not incredible that the government that would not
want to be answerable to anyone, including those who have chosen its
anchors, would want another entity equally in the invisibility trade to
open its account and daily activities to it under the pretense of
regulations. All of these raise more questions than answers. And indeed,
that is the kind of ambience often generated by the fusion of politics,
economics, philosophy and ethics in a gathering of over two dozen
established scholars from different fields and locations.