to refine a bit.the slave trade ended before slavery was declared illegal. the major europeans outlawed the trade in 1807, 1808, and 1815. the practice of slavery was abolished in 1833-34, by most europeans. the americans also abolished the slave trade 20 yrs after the constitution was adopted in 1787, i.e in 1807, but slavery wasn't abolished until the american civil war. after than only some spanish places, like cuba, kept slavery till late 1880s, and one province in brazil did the same.
as for the actual practice, we all know it gets complicated. mauretania has declared it illegal more times than i can remember, and other parts of the world as well--but even that's not enough of an answer since plantation slavery was different from personal slavery, like in homes or being concubines, or things like people sold for their labor (say on fishing boats in asia, where it still goes on.... and on....)
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
the brits outlawed slavery itself in 1833 or 1834. but if you broaden the concept of slavery for a moment, and consider the lives of peasants displaced by the enclosure acts, forced to migrate to the cities where they lived in worse conditions than in the middle ages, and went to work at institutions like factories, lived in misery and disease and died young, their lives without choice were a replacement for slavery, or were, in reality, enslavement. the reforms of the 1830s might have saved capitalism, but really it saved the ownership of enterprises for the rich and powerful.
the story of capitalism since its beginnings in the 19th century is a variant of this, with conditions going up and down, but the top 1% or 10% living radically better than the working class not to mention the lumpenproletariat.
slavery was always relative in history, and my favorite example of this is the word for slave in ancient biblical terxts, "abd", which is the same as that for servant. ditto in arabic.
and indentured servants in the u.s. or africa in the 17th century were just slaves for fixed terms.
i supposed fixed term faculty feel like that nowadays, and with good reason.
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
chidi, most people in a position to make reparations would still consider it Crimes against Humanities.
laws of the past are irrelevant nowadays. we aren't considering if it was illegal. it was presumably legal to put the japanese in camps during wwII, but reparations have been made for it.
similarly, maybe it was legal under german law to commit genocide, including what was done to the herero, but new days and new thinking now consider it criminal.
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
hi chidi, i don't know, but i think it is an interesting question.
the notion of direct responsibility, indirect responsibility, that we today can't be held accountable for the crimes of our ancestors, has now become relevant. i don't think these are the real issues, to tellthe truth, but rather present/current unjust economic orders, and which should be corrected. using these arguments about past crimes simply to work to correct the current order is something i can support, even if i don't believe in the arguments about responsibility.
for instance, what if a class of wealthy people were judged to be victims of past crimes that a given bank had permitted. would you want to pressure the bank to pay them too? after 100years? after 200 years? i wouldn't.
on the other hand, when the nazis stole jewish property, the current day germans make restitution.
the same argument applies to the displacement of palestinians. the right to return can include compensation,and it was an issue worked out at oslo
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
gloria, i agree with you. but there is always a flip side, which is how to align support for one's position. if we were to take the issue of enslavement only, we'd have to ignore much that complicates any claims. moral righteousness is one part; historical parsing of claims is quite another thing. we could go on to claim the victimhood status of anyone, right down to jews who were capos in the camps, or who facilitated administration of the warsaw ghetto; not to mention african slavery itself, or that which existed everywhere in the 15th c, etc
why do we work for affirmative action? a similar question that arises all the time.and which gets different answers in europe or even in africa. the answer for me is how much we can use social engineering to correct inequalities in society today, not to correct past injustices.
how this can be used against us politically, your point, is an important question, for which i have no easy answer.
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
the brits outlawed slavery itself in 1833 or 1834. but if you broaden the concept of slavery for a moment, and consider the lives of peasants displaced by the enclosure acts, forced to migrate to the cities where they lived in worse conditions than in the middle ages, and went to work at institutions like factories, lived in misery and disease and died young, their lives without choice were a replacement for slavery, or were, in reality, enslavement. the reforms of the 1830s might have saved capitalism, but really it saved the ownership of enterprises for the rich and powerful.
the story of capitalism since its beginnings in the 19th century is a variant of this, with conditions going up and down, but the top 1% or 10% living radically better than the working class not to mention the lumpenproletariat.
slavery was always relative in history, and my favorite example of this is the word for slave in ancient biblical terxts, "abd", which is the same as that for servant. ditto in arabic.
and indentured servants in the u.s. or africa in the 17th century were just slaves for fixed terms.
i supposed fixed term faculty feel like that nowadays, and with good reason.
ken
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university