--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

What is wrong with an employee trying to get better paid by their employer? Why does anyone have a problem with this effort especially when the employer is the state run by elected public officials who unconscionably expend more public funds on their personal emoluments for little and infrequent useful work, than they do on any other budget heads?
While one does not approve of unethical and immoral behavior and the taking of undue advantage of others especially because of situation power differentials, the society is at the end of the day one whole and parts of it are microcosms of the whole.
I would argue on the strength of direct personal experience, that many ASUU members are ethical, moral professionals, deeply concerned about positive learning outcomes and morality issues in Nigeria’s higher education, and Nigeria as a country. Is it their fault that the system is what it is, given that the system works as it is mostly intended, designed and operated to function as it seems to do? I do believe too that as is most often times the case, it is most likely a minority of people (miscreants) in higher education who are responsible for the cases of abuse that happen in the system. To paint all persons in higher education with the same brush as has been attempted in a post below is to not acknowledge facts as they truly are. It is always imprudent to generalize. There are almost always exceptions. I am tempted to add that it is even worse to do so when one should have known better.
oa
Tel: +234 1 7615407
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
1) and 2) below seem to me to be more extravagant generalizations. The desired case can be made without besmirching the reputation the of all ASUU members, or impugning their integrity.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Modification :"On the issue of promotion metrics, you make false assertions which I will address in my next post".thankstoyin
On 18 September 2015 at 11:48, Oluwatoyin Adepoju <toyink...@gmail.com> wrote:
Moses,On Filtering InformationYou keep invoking and expanding your credentials in relation to this subject and yet keep making strategic missteps on the history and ethos of ASUU and, now, on the relationship of ASUU to various layers of university management.Is your self described exposure to the Nigerian university system not filtered primarily through which you have depicted as your bitter experience in your BA in Nigeria, an experience that is not representative of Nigerian higher education of many people?It is possible to hear only what one wants to hear that fulfills one's prejudices.Those prejudices seem to blind you to the limitations of your understanding of how the Nigerian university system is managed.The reports I get from Nigerian academics and students, both in person and on social media, paint a much more complex picture than you are presenting.You began by dismissing ASUU as contributing nothing beyond holding the govt to hostage for member's salaries.The falsehood of that was pointed out to you, leading you to modify your critique, acknowledging ASUU's contributions beyond member's pay, contributions which you now claim stopped in the mid 1990s.You were then challenged to justify your claim about ASUU's culpability in working against approaches to curb sexual harassment of students by its members.You pointed to what you described as the silence of ASUU members on USAAfrica Dialogues, as if USAAfrica Dialogues is an ASUU forum.People have different reasons for their choices of timing and manner of response on listserves such as this one, environments which are a significant distance from the theatre of action affected by the discussion.ASUU, University Senate, NUC and Promotion Criteria in Nigerian UniversitiesYou have now introduced a condemnation of ASUU as culplable in what you describe as destructive promotion metrics in the Nigerian university system.As was pointed out to you in the debate on ASUU on this forum at the time of the last ASUU strike, ASUU plays no role in the determination of university promotion metrics.That is the job of the university senate, possibly in collaboration with the Nigerian Universities Commission.The limitations for ASUU created by this procedure are amplified by the fact that there is a world of difference in orientation between ASUU, as a trade union, and the senate of the university as part of the apex governing body of the institution.Senate is management, ASUU is staff- a fundamental dichotomy reflected in the history of trade unionism.This dichotomy holds even though members of senate- heads of dept, deans, professors and the vice-chancellor, are all members of ASUU.Entry into managerial positions, such as head of dept, dean and vice- chancellor, modifies people's attitudes to issues affecting the work force on account of the change in relationship one now has to both the general members of staff to which one once belonged and the managerial team to which one now belongs.This dichotomy is demonstrated in differences of approach to strategic issues between management officers of the university, as members of senate and the larger group of academic staff.These differences are reflected in various approaches of management staff, particularly vice-chancellors, to the struggles of ASUU, particularly in response to heavy handed tactics by the govt.On the issue of promotion metrics, you raise vital questions which need to be addressed away from the atmosphere of emotive rhetoric and problematic allocation of blame in which you cloak your arguments.I will try to do so in my next post.On Modes of Sexual Negotiation in Relation to Forms of PowerI stated that:
"I am also aware of accounts of oppression of students by staff that were inadequately managed.I am also aware of students making themselves available to staff in the name of getting better exam scores."
We need carefully managed and enforced guidelines on sexual context. for students and staff.Failure to acknowledge two way culpability on this subject is pure self deception.To what degree do academic staff enjoy a greater degree of power than their students?Do various forms of power imply different kinds of authority between the actors concerned?Academic staff enjoy greater power than their students, generally speaking.Academic staff may also be seen as vulnerable, however.This vulnerability emerges from the prominence of the teacher's position in relation to the group the teacher guides.Being a teacher may make one open to various seduction strategies, a situation which, in my view, teachers need to be trained in how to handle and students guided in how best to relate to teachers.Any claim that the teacher should be seen as a paragon of virtue, an angelic, disembodied entity who must be solely responsible in all particulars for managing the negative and positive possibilities of his social environment in relation to the adult population represented by university students is pure fiction, and is not based on a realistic understanding of human nature..This is not to claim that teachers should be excused when they cross a negative line, but that the two way traffic of sexual predatoriness between teachers and students needs to be recognised and managed through information dissemination, training in social interaction and disciplinary measures.thankstoyin
Moses,
"I am also aware of accounts of oppression of students by staff that were inadequately managed.I am also aware of students making themselves available to staff in the name of getting better exam scores."
We need carefully managed and enforced guidelines on sexual context. for students and staff.Failure to acknowledge two way culpability on this subject is pure self deception.To what degree do academic staff enjoy a greater degree of power than their students?Do various forms of power imply different kinds of authority between the actors concerned?Academic staff enjoy greater power than their students, generally speaking.Academic staff may also be seen as vulnerable, however.This vulnerability emerges from the prominence of the teacher's position in relation to the group the teacher guides.Being a teacher may make one open to various seduction strategies, a situation which, in my view, teachers need to be trained in how to handle and students guided in how best to relate to teachers.Any claim that the teacher should be seen as a paragon of virtue, an angelic, disembodied entity who must be solely responsible in all particulars for managing the negative and positive possibilities of his social environment in relation to the adult population represented by university students is pure fiction, and is not based on a realistic understanding of human nature..This is not to claim that teachers should be excused when they cross a negative line, but that the two way traffic of sexual predatoriness between teachers and students needs to be recognised and managed through information dissemination, training in social interaction and disciplinary measures.
thankstoyin
Beautiful summation from Samuel Zalanga.
"Nigerian University Education : Past, Present, Future : My Life at the University of Nigeria", Nsukka by Chijioke Ngobili
on September 17, 2015 / in Education, News 12:55 am / Comments
By Amaka Abayomi, Tare Youdeowei & Kelechukwu Iruoma
WHen Shola, who was a 300 Level student of Business Administration in University of Ibadan, was propositioned by one of her core course lecturers, a professor that students dreaded failing his course, little did she know what fate had in store for her. Shola said: “I was surprised when he made his intentions known to me because I was your normal everyday kind of girl who didn’t dress provocatively. When I rejected his advances, he made it clear that it was either I gave in to him or spend an extra year in school.
Intelligentstudents
“I stood my grounds and had made up my mind to spend the extra year despite being one of the intelligent students in the department. When he saw that I was adamant and he knew he couldn’t defend failing me in the exams, he scored me 40 despite my best efforts.”
Today, Shola runs a successful human capacity training business. She is among the lucky few who escaped the clutches of randy lecturers and higher institution staff, especially as most students spend extra years till they give in to these demands.
Who’s at fault? Sexual harassment is bullying or coercion of a sexual nature, or the unwelcome or inappropriate promise of rewards in exchange for sexual favours. It is unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favours and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.
Nigerian ivory towers have moulded intellectuals that have shaped the destiny of this nation and have spawned icons, who are contributing their quota to national and global development. But these citadels of academic and moral excellence have, pathetically, become havens for randy lecturers, who specialize in sexual harassment, sexual gratification and, in most cases, rape.
That the internet is full of stories and images of how some lecturers, who were bent on sleeping with students before they would allow them graduate, were set up by would-be victims and their friends, have not deterred others from engaging in such acts. The question then is who is at fault for the rise in this malaise— the female students or lecturers.
‘The students’: A mother of two undergraduates and a post-graduate student herself, Mrs. Kate Oragui, emphatically lays the blame at the doorsteps of female students, who dress scantily and provocatively, especially those who she describes as ‘academically and morally bankrupt’.
She said “when I started my post-graduate programme at the University of Lagos, I was shocked to see female students wearing cloths that barely covered their nakedness and I wonder how they would not be sexually harassed or raped by men who can’t control their libido.
“It is boldly written at the school’s entrance that the way you dress determines how you would be addressed. So I wonder why female students can’t respect and cover their bodies. A good number of the victims are either morally or intellectually bankrupt and are willing to do anything to score high grades.”
Blaming the female students, a Combine Arts student of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, who did not want her name in print, said: “The victims actually play a part in their predicament through their provocative dressing or manner of approaching the male lecturers.
“In cases where such lecturers make promises of good grades, I don’t think I would still consider that as rape. Be that as it may, these ‘good grades’ hardly turn out to be an ‘A’. Rather, it’s usually something less, degrading the self-worth of such a lady that succumbs to such sexual approaches.”
‘It’s lecturers, students, authorities’
Condemning the act in the strongest terms, a lecturer at the University of Benin, Dr. Daniel Ekharefo, blamed the lecturers, female students and school authorities for feeding this monster. He said: “I wonder the level of perversion of the individuals in such cases. Young people should avoid short cuts to success as many lecturers, who sleep with students, ride on the promise to give good grades to students but end up taking advantage of them.
“Unfortunately, the students, more often than not, are prepared to offer their bodies for marks. What is required therefore, is for students to read hard and stand firm. No lecturer can take advantage of a brilliant and intelligent student. “Lecturers need a moral re-awakening to the ethics of their profession and their place in nation building, and school authorities should open channels of communication where students can ventilate their grievances and report the unethical behaviour of their tutors.”
Victims speak up
A third year student of UNN (names withheld), who was sexually harassed by a lecturer, said she did the right and most moral thing by turning down the lecturer despite being promised a good grade.
She said: “It is just a mechanized way by randy male lecturers to satisfy their sexual urge. Some of them are just empty promises and those that go ahead to rape the students should be critically followed up by law enforcement agencies for appropriate punishment.
“It is a devilish act which should be stopped. I believe that students have the right to be listened to when such complains come up in a school environment. And female students should speak to the right persons about such harassment and avoid such lecturers.”
She suggested that ad hoc committees or councils be set up in every tertiary institution to specifically protect students and mete out punishments to offending lecturers or any offender, for that matter.
Another victim of sexual harassment, a National Diploma, ND, II student of Library and Information Science, Federal Polytechnic, Oko, Anambra State, who pleaded anonymity, noted that sexual harassment and rape are not new because they happen everyday in schools.
Recounting her experience, she said: “Most lecturers feel they can intimidate and threaten female students because, at the end of the day, they are the ones that would score them. So, they see this as a tool to achieve their evil plans. I was lucky because the lecturer involved wasn’t taking us on any core course. So I knew the consequences of calling his bluff would not be so bad.
“So serious was he about having his way with me that he even gave me money to go pay for a hotel room and wait for him at an appointed time. It was like telling the sheep to go wait for the butcher at the slaughter house. Being a sharp Lagos girl, I disappeared with the money after giving him false hope that I would be waiting for him.
“When he eventually saw me after some weeks, I gave one lame excuse and he said I was the first Lagos girl he came across that wasn’t loose as evident in my decent cloths. I guess he just wanted to try his luck with me.”
The way forward
In the words of one of the victims, lecturers who indulge in such acts should be severely punished to serve as a deterrent to others. She said: “I don’t think it would be too hard a consequence if our schools can be strict enough to withdraw the employment of anyone engaged in such act.
“Rape is not a minor issue and any lecturer caught in the act should be stripped of his position and publicly humiliated so that others would learn. Most of them go scot free and that is why they continue in those acts.”
I am not presenting the habilitation, in all its details of temporal progression, as a model Nigeria should follow, just describing the existence of systems with nationally uniform assessment systems across the nation.This document from presents the current state at the Technische Universität München.It is being reviewed, however, as indicated by the linked article from 2002 and this from 1999, in relation to the sciences.The habilitation requirement represents a unifying metric in the systems that use it, and it has produced a number of great works but its correlation with a specific time range has been described as slowing down progress of academics.Beyond the US : Germany and EnglandCan the US example suggested by Moses be imported to Nigeria in the way he describes it?Summation- does Nigeria demonstrate the cultural, social and economic maturity required to place determination of promotion criteria in the hands of individual depots and programs?Finally, the US is also operating with the world's most powerful information dissemination network. This network is created by the activity of publishing houses and booksellers within what I describe as the Euro-American cultural and economic empire, comprising North America and Europe, in which networks of information management weave the system into a whole, as dramatically demonstrated by the mutual influence of European scientists in laying the foundations for dominant scientific world view shortly before World War 2, with the leading research in the field being published in journals in German and English and yet being read across the continent, evoking the time when Euorope was unified by a common language of learning, Latin.The US also has a powerful judicial system which the citizens actively use in seeking redress for many kinds of issues, meaning people are careful that the other person could 'lawyer up' in the case of breach of promotion rights etc. Nigeria is not so mature.With such powerful foundations, certain standards will not fall below a particular point bcs those living by those standards will not allow it.The US is also sitting on the vast cultural heritage of Europe, from ancient Greece to the present, values that shape the cognitive culture of the society and its educational system.Would that not inspire a descent into hell, the proliferation of in the culture of manipulating promotion criteria to suit oneself and one's cohort in the promotion ladder while making it harder for others, manufacturing spurious and short lived journals for the purpose of promotion,promotion on the basis of little productivity in the name of jacking up ethnic representation, among other vices Nigerian academics have been accused of?Imagine what could happen if you placed the decision making as to publication/promotion metrics of Nigerian universities in the hands of individual programs and departmentsI almost shudder thinking of what would happen if such a system were adopted in Nigeria.Moses description is useful :What are these issues?It is a huge task and a person who has only relatively recently battled his way to a position of survival cannot be condemned for not struggling to address such higher order issues.The issues involved in promotion criteria are so complex, so deeply interwoven with Nigerian society and economy that it would require substantial reworking of the relationship btw academia and society at national and global levels to address.This battle is meant to protect the humanity of its members as people who deserve to be reasonably paid for their work.The character of Nigerian politics and economy, both being unstable, imply this survivalist battle might have to continue.ASUU has been engaged for decades in fighting a survivalist battle on behalf of its members.Why?Ideally speaking, ASUU could be challenged to examine this subject but it is not realistic to condemn ASUU for not doing so.Promotion Criteria in Nigerian Universities in a National and Global ContextThe Role of ASUUShould ASUU play a strategic role in revising this?
'It seems to me commonsensical that if you set a national uniform publication/promotion metric, the inadvertent result would be bean counting--a simple focus on number of publication (where even a newspaper op-ed can be counted as a publication) instead of quality of research, research trajectory, publication venue, and quality of said publications.'The example of a newspaper op ed may best be seen as a hyperbolic example meant to make his point.Decentralising Academic Asessment Criteria in NigeriaMoses suggests the contrastive US example to replace that of Nigeria:
'Here in the States, institutions, public or private, and even individual programs and departments are generally allowed to set their own publication/promotion metrics, which can vary from discipline to discipline. Yes, it is not perfect, it is sometimes subjective and open to interpretation and manipulation, but it is the way to avoid the problem of bean counting that plagues Nigerian higher education.'
An ethnically and politically divided nation. A nation that is only just stumbling towards its own culture of learning. A country with no roots in a learning culture beyond the last less than 100 years or much less. A country without an endogenously developed cognitive history as central to its learning systems. A country with a weak economy, weak organs of knowledge dissemination and judiciary. A country where becoming a vice- chancellor is described as often tied to ethnicity. A country where struggles for positions in universities are sometimes carried out using open deployment of magical instruments. A country where the current ruler has just placed his kinsmen in the most sensitive positions and dismissed the other jobs he is yet to announce, his cabinet of ministers, as noise makers.Socio/Economic and Pedagogical intertiwnings in US CultureThe US may operate its system the way Moses describes it bcs the country is sitting on a strong foundation of shared values that unify most of its citizens. It has a unified history that binds those citizens. Nigeria, on the other hand, is a conglomeration of peoples with diverse histories, inadequately bound by their forced journey together in a little above 50 years of co-existence.
Germany and England operate within the same cultural network as the US but run systems that are not identical with what Moses describes of the US example.The German HabilitationIn Germany, a central example of this difference is the habilitation, a scholarly book required for a permanent job in the university, to present a basic sense of my understanding of the role it played in the careers of such scholars as Martin Heidegger.England and the Research Excellence FrameworkEngland has also developed the Research Excellence Framework which provides uniform criteria for assessing English universities, as demonstrated at the article at the link that also presents criticism of the system.These examples demonstrate that Nigeria is not alone in using nationally uniform assessment criteria, but shares this characteristic with countries of high research impact.The Way ForwardHow may Nigeria avoid what Moses describes as the nonweighting of publications in terms of levels of quality and no above the basic requirement.I dont have an answer to that.My immediate interest, however, is in something more fundamental- the development of an indigenous cognitive network.What does this mean?I am uninspired by the use of the West as the primary point of reference for the development and dissemination of knowledge- specifically ideas that frame discourses, journals, books, conferences.Why?Is it possible for a learning system to achieve maturity if its central ideas, methods of developing and disseminating knowledge are external to its own culture?The West built its educational system by developing a significantly inbred academic culture that has now become a global centre.For centuries, this system communicated largely with itself and little with others even in the study of those others.What can Africans do to make themselves into a centre of knowledge in dialogue on equal terms with other centres?ThanksToyin
-- kenneth w. harrow faculty excellence advocate professor of english michigan state university department of english 619 red cedar road room C-614 wells hall east lansing, mi 48824 ph. 517 803 8839 har...@msu.edu
-- kenneth w. harrow faculty excellence advocate professor of english michigan state university department of english 619 red cedar road room C-614 wells hall east lansing, mi 48824 ph. 517 803 8839 har...@msu.edu
I started my fourth session in university with a high dose of excitement. Being back on the familiar grounds of school, reunited with my friends and the prospect of all the adventures awaiting us during the semester was a real pleasure. I was particularly interested in the second semester, when we would be on industrial attachment and we would rest from the agony of coursework and long lectures.
But before then, I had to cross the daunting hurdle of first semester. It was perhaps the most intensive semester of university – several three units courses and a long sojourn on the Fadama farm during the dry season. Among those courses was a course called Production Economics; AEM 403. It was one of those courses I did not look forward to, economics bored me quickly. But I had taken two other economics courses and passed them very well, so I was not worried about my performance, just the unending drudgery of debating the virtues of demand and supply, examining the artistic merits of graph after graph and reading bland, dusty essays on economic theories of dead men from ages past.
My lecturer did not make things easy either. He was, in keeping with the character of his profession, a scarce commodity indeed. Whenever he graced us with his presence, which was rarely, he raced through the day’s lecture, scribbling equations on the board; reciting explanations like a babalawo chanting incantations and then he would turn to us and ask, “it’s easy, isn’t it?”
Before we had a chance to answer, he would back turn to the board, wipe off everything and begin another economic performance.
In spite of his lack of dedication, I found the course easy and even interesting, because the concepts of production, of profit maximization, cost minimization and resource allocation were just fancy expressions for general concerns every business person had to deal with. The main challenges were the countless functions and knotty equations which required the use of calculus to demystify. But once you had solved the equations, it was easy explaining your answers even to a primary school pupil. It took some days to refresh my understanding of differential equations and then I became a guru! I even started teaching people, economics of all courses!
About two weeks to our continuous assessment tests, Mr lecturer miraculously appeared and delivered another thrilling recital on production economics, punctuated with his usual solo refrain of “it’s easy, isn’t it?” And when we shouted Noooo!, he took it as the ovation of an overwhelmed audience and continued his conversation with the board.
Minutes later, the class erupted into an agitated chorus of protesting and chaos. Fearing for his life, oga lecturer turned to us, his face a pleading mask of fear, hands hanging limp and impotent. He seemed to be considering his chances of success if he rushed for the door, but after two futile glances in that direction, he decided to confront his angry students instead.
A girl stood up to speak. She told him we did not understand what he was teaching, especially the equations since most of us hated mathematics and many in the class were still battling a mathematics carryover from 100 level. I understood what she was talking about; I had failed that course in 100 level, in this very auditorium.
The man nodded and told us not to worry about the equations, we should focus more on understanding the relationship between the figures instead. He promised that even if we made mistakes in the mathematical solutions, he would pardon, as long as we could explain the central concepts in the course. Everyone was happy, that was what we wanted to hear.
Test day came. I was prancing about the whole area, solving past questions and boasting I would score the highest. It felt good to be the man with the answers. A few minutes before we went in for the test, someone showed me a past question that made my heart quake. It was an strange equation; instead of regular figures, there were indices. And I hated indices! I hated algebra! I looked at it and laughed, “it can’t come out!”
I was dead wrong.
The first question was crafted in that kind of wicked equation. My palm suddenly became sweaty, and I sat still for several minutes, stunned. I could hear groans of surprise from others in the hall. Then I consoled myself by answering the other two questions which were definitions and examples of some concepts. Afterwards, I returned to the equation and tried to recollect the laws of indices. Somehow, I seemed to remember and solved the equation, slowly and sweating on my answer sheet. I got my final figures, wrote down the explanation and reviewed my answers. Even though my pride was deflated, I felt I had done a good job.
When the marked scripts were returned weeks later, we were shocked and angry. I got a high score of 3/30, which was the average score. Even some of the students with the highest CGPA’s did not score as high as me. We trooped to his office to complain, but the smart guy had traveled to Ibadan on one of his more important business trips. I visited his office almost everyday after then, he was hardly around.
Finally, one afternoon, while we were preparing for the exams, I stepped out of the library and met him walking briskly to his office. I ran after him, unfortunately, I did not have my script with me.
“Excuse me sir!” I called out. He stopped and regarded me with an irritated look.
“What is it?”
“I’ve been looking for you since, I’m one of your students, AEM 403” He frowned and continued walking. I tried to keep up with him.
“I wanted to discuss my test score with you, I don’t think I deserved the score I got, I don’t think it was fair at all, sir.” He stopped again and looked at me keenly, studying my face, then said I should seem him the next day with my script.
Surprisingly, he was in his office the next day and remembered me as soon as I walked in.
After informing me of my apparent lack of respect and the hopeless moral decadence of my generation, we went through my test script together. He could only fault an error in somewhere in the mathematical solution, but could not explain how all the scores summed up to three. I showed him all the explanations I had written and asked if they did not count for anything. He could not even produce his marking scheme like other lecturers, he just looked lost, as usual.
It was later we heard that he gave the scripts to a post-graduate student to mark, because he was out on a more profitable trip, and now, he was too proud to apologise. The final results for AEM 403 were very low and so unbelieving that it took the intervention of the Senate for the scores to be reviewed. At the end, the students lost, because a lecturer considered his own private business more important than his primary job.
I will always remember this man as the worst lecturer I ever had. I don’t think he was interested in his work at all, even when he came to class, he was distant and always in a hurry to leave. We were just an unavoidable nuisance to him. Many have stories like this, worse even. This is sometimes the portrait of a Nigerian university education.
I have always believed some professions like the academics are callings almost as sacred as being called to be a minister. Because they involve the delicate task of directly building people, transferring knowledge and training them. It is not for everybody. If you are not called to that ministry, don’t go there, you may destroy lives.
ASUU is on strike presently. I hope when, if, the government meets their demands, they in turn will be able to perform the noble duty they owe their students, their community and Nigeria. I hope they will demand and enforce responsible scholarship from all universities and hold all lecturers to the highest standards possible.
I had a thousand and one similar experiences. Sometimes, I wonder if some of our lecturers deserve what they’re demanding. A Nigerian student is always at the mercy of insensitive lecturers who practically have the yam and the knife.
September 14, 2015.
The Commissioner of Police,
Cross River State Command,
Calabar.
Dear Sir,
DEMAND FOR THOROUGH AND URGENT INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF PROF. CYRIL OSIM NDIFON OF THE FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF CALABAR FOR RAPE AND OTHER OFFENCES
Introduction
We are alumni of the Faculty of Law, University of Calabar, Calabar. We are all barristers and solicitors of the Supreme Court of Nigeria and are spread throughout Nigeria and well beyond. Professor Cyril Osim Ndifon, the disgraced and suspended Dean of the Faculty of Law, University of Calabar, was one of our law lecturers. He taught us the course Nigerian Legal System sometime in the year 1999.
We heard with alarm the allegation that Professor Cyril Osim Ndifon raped Sinemobong Ekong Nkang, one of his students, following her refusal of his sexual overtures. While we know that by section 36 (5) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), a presumption of innocence inures in favour of anyone accused of having committed an offence, we note with dismay that the allegation is all too familiar and is an enduring theme of the over two-decades-old academic career of Prof. Ndifon. Ndifon’s victims number in the hundreds, if not thousands. Our own class, which is approximately 200-stong, teems with victims of his intimidation, sexual harassment and sexual predation.
The Facts of the Rape
Professor Cyril Osim Ndifon had scheduled a test for his 400-level Law of Equity & Trust class to be held on Saturday, August 29, 2015 in one of the halls of the Faculty of Law. The test held as scheduled. Forty minutes into a sixty-minute exercise, he entered the hall and asked everyone to hand in their answer booklets. As invigilators moved from desk to desk collecting scripts, those who were yet to be reached tried feverishly to round up their answers. Professor Ndifon walked up to one of these students, a 20-year-old girl whom he had been admiring for ages, grabbed her script and tore it to shreds, dumping the shreds on her desk. The hapless and totally bewildered girl gathered the shreds and stuffed them into her bag.
About half an hour later, she was on her way out of the faculty building and was bound for her hostel in the company of friends when Prof. Ndifon drove in. He had left shortly after the drama in the examination hall. On seeing her, he asked whether she still had her shredded answer script. Yes, she answered. Prof. Ndifon then asked her to gather them, get a fresh foolscap sheet of paper and go up to his office to copy out her original answers. She went up to his office where she met his secretary and two other persons. She explained her mission and was allowed to sit with them in the outer office to copy out her answers. The Dean’s office is on the first floor.
Shortly thereafter, Prof. Ndifon walked in. He directed her to go to his private office on the second floor so she could use the table there. She had been writing with the answer script placed on her thighs and had been uncomfortable. She gratefully went to his office on the floor above and settled down to work. About five minutes into her writing, Prof. Ndifon walked in with his trademark swagger. He had a glass of wine in his hand. He took a sip of it and, without swallowing it, asked a kiss of her. She declined and continued with her writing.
He went out. About five minutes later, he returned. This time, he locked the door and removed the key from the lock. To put the girl’s mind at ease, he told her he wanted to work and could do without distractions. He sat on his chair and seemed to be working when he suddenly stood up, walked up to the girl and solicited for a kiss. Again, the girl turned him down. He seemed to take her rejection in his strides and told her to go on with her writing. However, he remained restless. A few minutes later, he planted himself before her and tried to force her to drink his wine. When she again refused he poured some of it into his mouth and tried to force a wine-laden kiss on her. The girl fought him off, causing some of the wine to spill on the floor and on her clothes.
Determined to have some reward for his exertions, he dragged her from her seat to the settee a few metres away and told her pointblank that he wanted to have sex with her. She told him that she would not have sex with him. He tried to forcefully undress her. She screamed. With no one answering her screams, he undressed himself and fetched a condom from a shelf in his office. He put it on and, pinning her down, forced his manhood into her body, inflicting a great physical and emotional pain that was as brutal as it was mindless.
While he continued to hurt her, there was a knock at the door. The fellow knocked and went away, the footfall receding. Prof. Ndifon got off the body of his young victim, wore his clothes and helped her into her own clothes. He apologized profusely, telling her that he did not know what had come over him. He opened the door and went out. The girl looked round for her mobile phone so that she could place an SOS call. It was nowhere to be found. She went to the door and tried the handle. It was locked. In her traumatized state, she had not heard him locking it. With nothing to do, she imposed some composure on herself. She had gone there to write her test. She had to follow through as she was anxious not to fail the course of no less a lecturer than the Dean of the Faculty himself.
About thirty minutes later, her nightmare turned the key in the lock and entered. He was carrying a bottle of Guinness Stout which he opened and began to drink out of. He offered it to her but she declined. He tried to force the bottle into her mouth. Some of the drink entered her mouth which she promptly spat onto the floor. He took a swig of the bottle, dragged her close and forced the drink from his mouth into hers. Yet again, she spat it out on the floor.
He flew into a rage and ordered her to undress at the count of three. His victim had not eaten all day. Her ordeal lasted from around 3 to 5pm. She was very exhausted and told him as much. But Prof. Ndifon was having none of it. He counted to three. When his victim refused to obey him, he dragged her to the settee and, suing his knees to pinion her, ripped the zipper on her trousers. She was weak both from hunger and her ordeal and, in tears, pleaded with him to let her be. He was deaf to her entreaties. He told her that she was so great an actress that she could win an Oscar, assuring her he had met many girls like her in the past.
After more struggling, his weary victim was momentarily free. She got down on her knees and pleaded with him to let her go. He simply pushed her down, wore a condom and once again forced his manhood into her body. When he saw that she was at the point of losing consciousness, he got off her body and told her she could go. He offered to drop her off in his car. But she refused his offer. She got dressed and was staggering down the stairs when he caught up with her and asked her to carry his bag to his car. She complied. Only one of his staff was left. He assisted his boss to lock up the Dean’s office after which they drove off in Prof. Ndifon’s car.
By this time, all her friends and course mates who had been waiting for her had all left, except one who refused to leave. According Sinemobong, the said friend saw her
’’…in tears and rushed up to help me. He asked what happened to me, but I could not still put myself together to tell him what happened. I asked him to help dial my mother’s number in my phone, and I narrated briefly what Ndifon did to me. My friend, with the help of a Good Samaritan drove me to the Police Station where I made a written statement”.
The Issues
Other Crimes
Prof. Cyril Osim Ndifon was a law undergraduate of the University of Calabar in the 1980’s. However, in his second or third year, the University rusticated him for cultism-related activities. He went to the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University) where he later obtained his Bachelor of Law degree (LLB) and the University of Jos for his Master of Laws (LLM). We are dismayed that the University of Calabar eventually offered him a position as an academic staff and thus gave him a platform which he used to pursue his mischief for about two decades now.
It is our opinion that based on the character deficit which his rustication typifies; the University should not have employed him. There is thus no doubt in our minds that by its negligence or perhaps even outright refusal to carry out a thorough background check on Prof. Cyril Osim Ndifon, the University of Calabar unleashed an absolute monster on the hapless students of the University in general and students of the Faculty of Law in particular. The University of Calabar therefore shares direct blame in the unfortunate incident of August 29, 2015.
Prof. Cyril Osim Ndifon attended the Nigerian Law School. From our experience, we know that before a law graduate is offered admission by the School, he must fill out a form– which is on oath. Part of the information that the form seeks to elicit is whether the applicant had ever been rusticated from the university and whether he was or had ever been a secret cultist. An applicant who answers those questions in the affirmative is invariably denied admission. Considering that Prof. Cyril Osim Ndifon was offered admission and that he went on to pass out of the School, it is clear that he lied on oath.
Prof. Cyril Osim Ndifon is also an academic entrepreneur albeit in a negative sense. He carries on a thriving money-for-grades trade and habitually solicits for money from students in exchange for grades. In our time, one of his agents was our classmate. He habitually failed students who either refused to bow to his extortionist scheme or yield to his rabid sexual advances.
The Intrigues
Prof. Ndifon is a powerful man. He is a legal practitioner, a professor of law and a Dean of the Faculty of Law. He also has a huge sentimental capital. He is Cross River State’s first (and, to the best of our knowledge, only) Professor of Law. People in the highest echelons of power in the State and beyond are working hard to help him escape justice. They argue that Cross River State will be the loser if he falls from his exalted position. It does not matter to them that his sexual rapacity knows no tribe or tongue.
Prof. Ndifon himself has never been guilty of displaying any ethnic sentiments in his selection of victims. In fact, he has an eclectic taste: whether Igbo or Efik, Ejagham or Ibibio, Yoruba or Ijaw, Yakurr or Yala, everyone is fair game. Besides, it is disingenuous for anyone to suggest that Cross River State can be best served by a serial rapist. No glory can sprout from a foundation of shame and infamy. He is not an asset to Cross River State but rather a heavy liability.
Already, Prof. Ndifon and his proxies have taken to social media, especially Facebook, to plead his case. Firstly, they leaked the identity of the victim by publishing her name and picture; their aim is to traumatize her further into perpetual silence. All previous press reports had withheld the information as to the identity of the victim. Secondly, they have tried to shape the narrative in a way that casts the victim as a morally loose person. But that cannot stand. Even if a lady is a whore, it is no less rape for any man to have sexual intercourse with her without her consent.
Again, Prof. Cyril Osim Ndifon and his sympathizers are piling tremendous pressure on the girl to drop the case. They have also subjected her to threats and intimidation. In fact, her lawyers have taken up the matter of an Army captain who called the victim to threaten her.
Our Prayers
On the strength of the foregoing, we earnestly and respectfully urge on you the following demands:
We urge you to ensure that this matter is not compromised or even compounded. As the police often remind us, it is an offence to compound a felony. Rape is not a matter for amicable settlement. Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
The Law Class of 1997,
University of Calabar
Signatories:
Cc:
Stories from Nigerian Universities
Frank Ugiomoh
Professor of Art History and Theory, University of Port Harcourt
Dear Toyin: I am fine and to hope that you are too.
I read some response to your post on the university.
The responses were exaggerated and appears to emanate from non academic students.
Yes such demands make the round in the universities no doubt.
But where students have the courage to report such and they are found to be true, such teachers loose their jobs.
I chair the Professional Ethics Committee (PEC) in my university.
We investigate unethical conducts.
Cheers.
On 21 September 2015 at 14:26, Oluwatoyin Adepoju <toyink...@gmail.com> wrote:Please Read Responses on Ikhide's WallNigerian Universities On My Mind
If you dont have a Facebook account, get one.Ikhide asks students to sum up their Nigerian university education, giving it a grade. People are also asked to name their best and worst lecturers. He asks for their views on ASUU. Finally, what are their views on sexual harassment by teachers- is it an epidemic?
The entire exchange between Ikhide and his respondents sums up my position.Question : what is the state of health of Nigerian university education?Is it defined by good or evil or something in between?It would seem the jury is out on this.thankstoyin
...
[Message clipped]
Tel:+234 1 7615407
Email: n...@alliancesforafrica.org, nigerian...@gmail.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/nigerianfeministforum
Twitter: nff2008
About the NFF;The Nigerian Feminist Forum is a biennial conference that brings together Nigerian feminist activists to deliberate on issues of key concern to the movement.--------------------------------------------Iheoma Obibi
Mobile: + 234 803 302 0779
Int' mobile: + 44 7713 401454
Skype: iheomaobibi
http://www.alliancesforafrica.org
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.