I use 'epidemic' in the sub-title in
elastic terms to suggest a rapid escalation of deaths, often
emerging in what look like circumstances unrelated to the context in
which this escalation takes place, Black people being killed on a
practically monthly basis by police even when they are clearly
non-threatening or even when incapacitated.
![](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-OQNJXj40FlU/V4kVVfiyIgI/AAAAAAAACUk/0OV8dnkuby8zpN2_-yqHGbpTlqzEJO5cQCLcB/s640/White-Peace-Dove-Pigeon-HD.jpg) |
Give Peace a Chance |
When I became
naturalized as an American citizen, I expected to inherit the casual
arrogance inherent in the country’s position as the global hegemon. I
did not. Instead I inherited an identity as an African American, along
with the daily humiliation at the hand of law enforcement authorities
that comes with it. I became too aware of police killing black people
and getting away with it, and began to understand why the American black
population were given to conspiracy theories. Joseph Heller once said,
“Just because you are paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t after you”.
Black people, especially black men, understand quite clearly that the
nation’s law enforcement officers are out to get them. This has been the
case since the days of slavery. The current spate of shooting and
killing black men for no rational reason reminds African Americans of
the brutal policing that accompanied segregation. These police killings
are meant to secure the unquestioning acquiescence of African Americans
and it denies us our rights under the constitution.
In a recent post, I characterized the persistent
shooting/killing of black people (men and women) by police in the USA as acts
of domestic terrorism. Since the
country is currently focused on thwarting ongoing international terrorism, I decided
to see how the government itself defines “terrorism”. According to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI)’s website, “domestic terrorism”:
Involves acts dangerous to human life that violate federal
or state laws; [and] Appear intended
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; and
(ii) Occurs primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of
the U.S.
It is a fact
that white people (and I want to give my white American countrymen and
women the benefit of the doubt here), don’t quite understand what the
consequences of the frequent police killing of African American men
means for those of us who so far have avoided death at the hand of law
enforcement officers. I will try to describe what it means for black
Americans below.
My
mother-in-law is celebrating her birthday in Cleveland and I have
decided to drive up there to be present at the occasion. As a black man,
here is how the process unfolds for me. When I first mentioned the
drive to a friend, he suggested it might be better to fly, given how
often law enforcement officers stop black drivers (for Driving while
Black) and how frequently such stops end in police shooting black
drivers to death and subsequently avoiding prosecution of any kind. I
still decided to drive, and now that I think of it, I am writing this as
a testimony in case something should happen to me. That right there is
what I am talking about, with regard to police shooting as terrorism: it
subjects me to intimidation and coercion that now influences my
activities in myriad of ways.
Having decided
to make the drive, I rented a sedan from Enterprise (their fleet is made
up of fairly new cars, so no broken tail-lights or such; note that
run-down vehicles make this a class issue, but even blacks in high-end
vehicles are still killed). I prepared for the trip as follows: I will
be wearing a suit and freshly laundered shirt with no tie. I will be
driving close to the speed limit. If I get pulled over, I will have my
hands raised in clear view and wait until the police officer says it is
ok before reaching for anything. To avoid actually reaching for anything
that involves lowering my hands below the officer’s view and providing
the police a justification for shooting me, I will have my license and
registration visible on the dashboard of my car. I do not own or carry a
gun so hoefully that won't be an issue.
Note that even
with all these precautions, I would still have to lower my hand once to
activate my driver’s side mirror in order to hand over my documents to
the officer. This constitutes a tense situation so I will move my hand
very slowly to do so if needed. On the other hand, I could simply tape
my license and registration to my driver’s side mirror, so it is visible
if the officer asks for it. This will make it unnecessary to lower my
hands.
If nothing
happens (note the expectation that a routine traffic stop will escalate
into something fatal), I will drive away slowly and drive the speed
limit for ten minutes in case the office decides to trail me (this is
not uncommon). Hopefully, I arrive at my destination after a long but
uneventful drive.
Now the
description above is a clear definition of a population intimidated to
the extent that their constitutional rights are irrelevant and their
sole chance of escaping encounters with police officers is to express
complete docility, and even this doesn’t help in some instances. After
each police killing of a black man (or police assassination as recently
shown in the case of Alton Sterling’s death in Louisiana) you keep
hearing commentators say the black man should have obeyed police orders.
Well, Alton Sterling was already well subdued and pinned to the ground
BEFORE the white police officers involved shot him in the chest and
killed him. How much more "obedience" could he have demonstrated?
In a country
where slavery has supposedly ended (and where a slave owner could kill
his/slave for being “uppity”, i.e. not showing enough deference), black
people are still expected by the white public to be overly submissive to
white law enforcement officers. The problem however is that some white
police officers are still quick to see ANY actions by black men and
women as being an affront to their authority (Note I am not claiming
here that all white police officers are racist or incompetent). This
kind of response on the part of the officers resembles what you have in
authoritarian police states and for me as a naturalized American
originally from Africa, it reminds me of Jim-Crow America and the police
of apartheid South Africa.
The coercive and brutal law enforcement that sees black lives as expendable is what Black Lives Matter
fights against. They fight for the rights of African Americans to be
respected as much as those of white people. The counterattack that "All
Lives Matter" is asinine: if white lives were subjected to a fraction of
what black Americans have to deal with on a daily basis, they would
also be on the streets demanding change.
Make no mistake
about it: the ongoing campaign by certain political figures who pine
for an America of “law and order” are making a racist argument for the
return of white supremacy of the Jim Crow era, when blacks knew that
their place was under the jackboot of brutal law enforcement and whites
were comfortable perched atop their positions of privilege where all
their needs are served by blacks.
You can see
this order of things returning in earnest in Washington DC where I live.
I returned to this city after two decades to find that gentrification
has driven most of its black residents out of town. Gigantic new
apartment complexes have been filled with young white renters (or condo
owners) even in core black neighborhoods such as the U-Street corridor.
Coffee shops and upscale shopping places abound where blacks work as
service personnel. I have yet to see a white person behind the counter
in all the places I have entered to buy something. I watched, in a CVS
shop, as the white manager searched the bag of a young black man.
Someone had accused him of shoplifting. I myself walk warily when I am
in any store, and often am aggressively questioned about what I was
doing there.
So, it seems black Americans are back in the Jim Crow era again. So much for progress…