.jpg?part=0.1&view=1)
University of Benin Main Gate
by
Edirin247 - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0.
from
University of Benin Wikipedia page
As a former undergraduate and postgraduate student and eventually a lecturer at the Department of English and Literature, University of Benin, I am deeply disturbed by the efforts of Professor Okwechime Emmanuel of that university, in a voice interview posted online and linked here, to ameliorate or negate the guilt of lecturers in the ongoing scandal of sexual harassment of female students by male lecturers in Nigerian universities.
Okwechime frames as a hype generated by "people not being serious" a real, insidious and devastating problem, what is described as a culture of sexual harassment of female students by male lecturers in Nigerian universities, attested to by numerous eye witness accounts.
Power Differentials Between Students and Lecturers
Okwechime depicts the power of students and lecturers in equal terms by claiming that students' provocative dressing represents harassment of lecturers, an inducement students use as leverage to offer sexual favours in return for grades.
This perspective is inaccurate because students' style of dressing for any reason, is not equal to the power of the lecturer to distance himself from such dangerous scenarios.
The student does not have much power to compel the lecturer to do their will but the lecturer has great power over the student.
These students are often very young and need guidance. They need their self esteem boosted. They need their capacity for creative achievement, for taking charge of their lives, reinforced, not the lecturer aiding their negative development by giving in to the students’ inadequacies arising from the students’ poor understanding of their own creative forces.
The Lecturer as an Agent of Social Creativity Not Social Destruction
The fact that Nigerian society is significantly corrupt, as Okwechime suggests, does not mean that academics are thereby excused from higher standards of conduct. Teachers are building our future for a better nation and a better world. Perpetuating a negative status quo is not their role.
Differences Between Sexual Ethics in Various Social Contexts
Its not accurate to equate sexual attraction in general with amorous relationships between lecturers and students, as Okewechime does, particularly in the context of factual, wide ranging and recurrent accounts of sexual harassment of female students by male lecturers.
Such a conjunction distorts the reality of the role of the teacher as a guide and of the university as a place for training, as different from the general space represented by a street where such strict rules of engagement in terms of roles and relative power do not obtain.
Even in the workplace, sexual relations between bosses and subordinates need to be carefully managed lest they poison the workplace.
Such caution is vital even between adults and seasoned professionals, which many in the workplace are, caution even more vital given the tenderness of university youth.
What is a University?
In all, though Okwechime is correct in stating that some female students also harass lecturers, the examples he has given of such harassment in terms of how the students dress as well as his dismissal of the accounts of sexual harassment of female students and his equating of the university space with a general social space where sexual attraction roams free demonstrates a lack of understanding of the nature of a university and of the academic as a guide within a system meant for bringing up mainly youth, where the lecturer’s power enables them to guide rather than give into negative strategies of such youth.
I am disturbed by his response, particularly coming from a professor, representing almost the highest level of leadership in a university.
Compounding this terrible anomaly, it is coming as a globally public statement on an issue of such magnitude in relation to a system, the university system, of universal presence and in relation to which one can observe best practices on such issues around the globe.
Also published on
As the US collegiate experience demonstrates, litigation is an effective tool that can be used to curb the widely-reported phenomenon of trading of sex for grades at certain institutions of higher learning within Nigeria and elsewhere. Apart from its moral turpitude, that practice ipso facto demeans the academic value of the degrees awarded by affected institutions. It raises questions—and rightly so—about the competence of graduates who got certified for one occupation/professional practice or the other by trading sex for grades.
In the case of the United States, universities evolved on their handling of this social problem: dating back to the 1980s or so, expensive court-imposed punitive damages eventually compelled universities to enact and strictly-enforce anti-sexual harassment codes. In sum, there is now in place a new cultural milieu on an average US university campus which makes a sexual relationship between a student and her/his instructor a forbidden act, a forbidden apple. Simply-put, it's a no-go area. It's almost safe to assert that any instructional employee of a university within the United States who wants a future for his/her career knows that sexual relations with his/her student is a no-go area. A strategy utilized by universities in the US is an on-boarding orientation for new employees that usually incorporates and requires completion of a work-shop (now mostly online) that's designed to familiarize the new hires with the institution's policy on sexual harassment matters.
As I have been told, all too often, out of shame and fear of potential social stigma, there is a tendency for a female student who has been sexually taken advantage of by her teacher to reframe from even owning up that she was a victim of that social ill.
Finally, I have heard so many anecdotal accounts of how female students are routinely sexually exploited with impunity across Nigerian institutions of higher learning by their instructors of record that I have silently promised myself that, as long as life permits, I will not allow any daughter of mine to study at a Nigerian university.
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/CALUsqTSL-6iPe4-sq%3DPP6HfEjNExThCnX_mpH04pR0ojRUSjGA%40mail.gmail.com.
As the US collegiate experience demonstrates, litigation is an effective tool that can be used to curb the widely-reported phenomenon of trading of sex for grades at certain institutions of higher learning within Nigeria and elsewhere. Apart from its moral turpitude, that practice ipso facto demeans the academic value of the degrees awarded by affected institutions. It raises questions—and rightly so—about the competence of graduates who got certified for one occupation/professional practice or the other by trading sex for grades.
In the case of the United States, universities evolved on their handling of this social problem: dating back to the 1980s or so, expensive court-imposed punitive damages eventually compelled universities to enact and strictly-enforce anti-sexual harassment codes. In sum, there is now in place a new cultural milieu on an average US university campus which makes a sexual relationship between a student and her/his instructor a forbidden act, a forbidden apple. Simply-put, it's a no-go area. It's almost safe to assert that any instructional employee of a university within the United States who wants a future for his/her career knows that sexual relations with his/her student is a no-go area. A strategy utilized by universities in the US is an on-boarding orientation for new employees that usually incorporates and requires completion of a work-shop (now mostly online) that's designed to familiarize the new hires with the institution's policy on sexual harassment matters.
As I have been told, all too often, out of shame and fear of potential social stigma, there is a tendency for a female student who has been sexually taken advantage of by her teacher to reframe from even owning up that she was a victim of that social ill.
Finally, I have heard so many anecdotal accounts of how female students are routinely sexually exploited with impunity across Nigerian institutions of higher learning by their instructors of record that I have silently promised myself that, as long as life permits, I will not allow any daughter of mine to study at a Nigerian university.
--
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/VI1PR04MB449331A134DB59B5F0C940F0A6950%40VI1PR04MB4493.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/VI1PR04MB449331A134DB59B5F0C940F0A6950%40VI1PR04MB4493.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/VI1PR04MB44935DD67EB02CC998FD1BF9A6940%40VI1PR04MB4493.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/VI1PR04MB44935DD67EB02CC998FD1BF9A6940%40VI1PR04MB4493.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/VI1PR04MB44935DD67EB02CC998FD1BF9A6940%40VI1PR04MB4493.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com.