i agree with olayinka's opening phrasing, "rape as defined by..."
there is so much packed into that.
rape as of the evil man lurking in the shadows, pouncing on the unsuspecting innocent virgin, etc etc., is the popular image, that no doubt corresponds to close to nothing in most societies.
what if rape is forced sexual relations, forced as in, even when one of the partners doesn't want it?
without belaboring the obvious, it is clearly a common enough occurrence around the world. in some cultures, religions, it is framed by the language of a woman being obliged to have sex with her husband. many patriarchal cultures still accept that as the man's
right.
in some cultures, it take 2 male witnesses to prove it occurred. and on and on.
in some cultures, when a woman goes to a hotel room with a man and they share drinks, that gives him the right to do whatever he wants.
etc
i have no trouble seeing cultural differences; but when we go to the point to explain why one is superior to the other on the basis of these differences, i start to wonder about the deeper truths at stake.
rape is wrong; women mostly are victims of it; and it is pretty common everywhere. that's my take on it.