FW: Kenya's Supreme Court has cancelled Kenya's election, orders new election within 60 days

17 views
Skip to first unread message

Dompere, Kofi Kissi

unread,
Sep 1, 2017, 12:49:04 PM9/1/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

This info may be of interest to some of our readers who may not be familiar.

Thanks.

KOFI

 

From: African Union Citizen [mailto:african...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 11:46 AM
To: Dompere, Kofi Kissi <kdom...@Howard.edu>
Subject: Kenya's Supreme Court has cancelled Kenya's election, orders new election within 60 days

 

 

 



On Friday, September 1, 2017,  Kenya's Supreme Court  annulled the results of the Kenyan elections, which took place on Aug. 8, 2017 citing irregularities and ordered a new vote within 60 days.

 

This reverses President Uhuru Kenyatta's 54 percent win  over his rival, Mr. Raila Odinga. The 4-2 court ruling was an outcome of a petition filed by Mr. Odinga, who alleged widespread fraud in the election, including the hacking of the electoral commission's computer system.

 

Following the judgment, Mr. Odinga raised his fists in the air in celebration. "This is indeed a very historic day for the people of Kenya and by extension to the people of the continent of Africa," Mr. Odinga said outside the courthouse.

 

For the first time in the history of African democratization, a ruling has been made by a court, nullifying an election of a sitting president.

 

When the Supreme court ruled against him in 2013, Mr. Odinga dismissed it as inept and even as he appealed in this election,  he said he had little faith in the court. He had called for a national strike, which failed to materialize. 

 

On the other hand, President Uhuru Kenyatta immediately pledged to respect the court's decision and indicated he is heading to the new polls with the same agenda that got him elected for the first time. "The court has made its decision. We respect it. We don't agree with it," he said, calling for peace. "That is the nature of democracy."

 

In describing the results of the election as "invalid, null and void," Chief Justice David Maraga promised  to issue full details of the ruling later.

 

"Taking the totality of the entire evidence, we are satisfied that the elections were not conducted in the accordance to the dictates of the Constitution," he said.

 

Kenya's election commission admitted that there had been a hacking attempt on its computer system but maintained it was unsuccessful. International observers had said there were no signs of interference with the vote.



The lawyer for the Commission, Mr. Paul Muite, argued during the hearing that the integrity of the vote had been protected "as far as was humanly possible."

 

Odinga's lawyer, however, countered that some 5 million votes were marred by discrepancies and the forms used to record results lacked key security features such as watermarks and the necessary stamps and signatures.



According to Murithi Mutiga, a senior analyst with the International Crisis Group, the decision is unprecedented for the whole continent and will set an important precedent.



"It's not very often you find a decision of such import going against an incumbent - it was really thoroughly unexpected," he said. "I think this is an in­cred­ibly important moment for democracy for Africa."

 

 

 

African Union Citizen: Actualizing Agenda 2063, 7915 24th Place, Hyattsvile, MD 20783

 

 

Sent by african...@aol.com in collaboration with

 

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Sep 1, 2017, 6:24:26 PM9/1/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
If it were in Nigeria, there would have been midnight raids by a combined team of DSS and EFCC on the homes of the Judges by now under the guise of anti- corruption.

CAO.

ayandiji daniel

unread,
Sep 1, 2017, 7:32:34 PM9/1/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com
I find these lines instructive:

"When the Supreme court ruled against him in 2013, Mr. Odinga dismissed it as inept and even as he appealed in this election,  he said he had little faith in the court. He had called for a national strike, which failed to materialize. ..."

 
"On the other hand, President Uhuru Kenyatta immediately pledged to respect the court's decision and indicated he is heading to the new polls with the same agenda that got him elected for the first time. "The court has made its decision. We respect it. We don't agree with it," he said, calling for peace. "That is the nature of democracy."
  
Ayandiji Daniel AINA, PhD

Professor of Political Science &
Vice Chancellor,
Caleb University,
Imota, Lagos State,
Nigeria.

Email Addresses   :diji...@yahoo.com
                              :dijiai...@gmail.com

"Unswerving loyalty to duty, constant devotion to truth, and  a clear conscience will overcome every discouragement and surely lead the way to usefulness and high achievement". Grover Cleveland



From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 11:24 PM
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - FW: Kenya's Supreme Court has cancelled Kenya's election, orders new election within 60 days

If it were in Nigeria, there would have been midnight raids by a combined team of DSS and EFCC on the homes of the Judges by now under the guise of anti- corruption.

CAO.


--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subs...@googlegroups.com 
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Segun Ogungbemi

unread,
Sep 1, 2017, 10:00:09 PM9/1/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com
The electoral commission actually caused the whole problem. It never had a good grasp of the job. 
Honestly, why would the commission allow itself to be used to favor one party? Whatever happened, the leadership of the electoral commission should be held responsible. 
Happily enough, the Supreme Court did the right thing. 
It is really shocking to hear the comment of Uhuru that six people decided the fate of the election that the majority of the electorate had given to him even when he knew that the election was rigid in his favor. 
Winning at all cost principle of the ruling party in Kenya is a general characteristic of what happens generally in Africa. To me, that is not democracy. 
Where will Kenyans get over a billion Kenya shillings for the repeat of the election at this time is a million dollar question? 
SO

Sent from my iPhone 

On Sep 2, 2017, at 12:31 AM, 'ayandiji daniel' via USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (usaafric...@googlegroups.com) Add cleanup rule | More info
I find these lines instructive:

"When the Supreme court ruled against him in 2013, Mr. Odinga dismissed it as inept and even as he appealed in this election,  he said he had little faith in the court. He had called for a national strike, which failed to materialize. ..."

 
"On the other hand, President Uhuru Kenyatta immediately pledged to respect the court's decision and indicated he is heading to the new polls with the same agenda that got him elected for the first time. "The court has made its decision. We respect it. We don't agree with it," he said, calling for peace. "That is the nature of democracy."
  
Ayandiji Daniel AINA, PhD

Professor of Political Science &
Vice Chancellor,
Caleb University,
Imota, Lagos State,
Nigeria.

Email Addresses   :diji...@yahoo.com
                              :dijiai...@gmail.com

"Unswerving loyalty to duty, constant devotion to truth, and  a clear conscience will overcome every discouragement and surely lead the way to usefulness and high achievement". Grover Cleveland



From: Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 11:24 PM
Subject: USA Africa Dialogue Series - FW: Kenya's Supreme Court has cancelled Kenya's election, orders new election within 60 days

If it were in Nigeria, there would have been midnight raids by a combined team of DSS and EFCC on the homes of the Judges by now under the guise of anti- corruption.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subs...@googlegroups.com 
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Sep 6, 2017, 3:49:51 PM9/6/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

When prejudice influences poetry, the truth suffers as a result. In the Nigerian legal system of limitless Maradona-dribbling, it is impossible for the Supreme Court in Nigeria to adjudicate and conclude proceedings in a Presidential election petition within a month after election result has been announced. Corruption and abuse of judicial power is 98% greater in Nigeria than in Kenya. In Nigeria, Presidential election petition must start from the election tribunal which will spend not less than ten months to auction judgment to the highest bidder and will proceed from there to the Appeal Court which will spend almost a year to sell judgment to the highest bidder before the appeal can land at the Supreme Court for final hearing and judgment in favour of the person who pays more. Let me clarify with examples.


In the Gubernatorial election of Anambra State, in 2003, Dr Chris Ngige of the PDP was declared a winner against Peter Obi of APGA. While the election petition dragged on, Dr. Ngige reneged on his agreement with his sponsor to the election victory, Chris Uba, (whose brother was special assistant to President Obasanjo) to give him a chunk of monthly revenue allocation to the state from the Federal government. Dr. Ngige wanted the entire allocation to be used for the  development of Anambra State. When all means to intimidate Dr. Ngige to comply with Chris Uba failed, the latter went to the Appeal Court to witness in favour of Peter Obi of APGA. Chris Uba revealed how election sheets were toe and finger thumbed before the election date in Anambra in which Dr. Ngige was declared Governor elected. Although Chris Uba was not prosecuted for perpetrating electoral fraud, the Supreme Court dismissed Dr. Ngige from office in 2005 and declared Peter Obi as the winner of 2003 Gubernatorial election. In 2007, Dr. Andy Nnamdi Uba, as he titled himself then, contested for the Governorship of Anambra State on the platform of PDP and he was declared a winner with 1.9 million votes. Some days after the election result, Uba's opponents discovered that the total number of voters in the register was 1.7 million and Professor Maurice Iwu's INEC quickly adjusted Dr. Andy Nnamdi Uba's winning votes to one million. One Mr. Greg Ikemefuna filed a court suit alleging that Dr. Andy Nnamdi Uba was not qualified to contest the Gubernatorial election because he did not attend any of the three Universities, and did not obtain any doctorate degree in 1996, as he claimed, filled and signed in INEC Form 001. The Universities Dr(?) Andy Nnamdi Uba claimed he attended in INEC Form 001 were Concordia University, Montreal , Canada, California State University, Los Angeles, and Buxton University, London. Mr. Greg Ikemefuna secured a letter from the UK Department of Education and Skills revealing that Buxton University did not exist. When Andy Nnamdi Uba was eventually eased out of office, it was because the election that threw him up as Governor should not have taken place, in view of the fact that, constitutionally, the four years tenure of Peter Obi started in 2005 when he was first sworn in and the next Gubernatorial election should, therefore, be 2009. The case of Andy Nnamdi Uba's false academic claim, has since been swept under the carpet by the court and he is now a Senator making laws for Nigerians.


Still in Anambra, it was discovered that the election that threw up Willy Obiano as the Governor of the State in 2013 contained illegal voters. For instance, a bowl of rice was registered with, a given date of birth, profession as a civil servant, sex as a male and was permitted to vote in the election. The election result was, however, legalized by the Supreme Court of Nigeria. 


In preparation for the March/April 2015 Federal and state  Elections, INEC announced that the elections would be conducted with the aid of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) and Card Readers. Devices that were intended to eliminate multiple voting, irregular voting i.e. registering in one unit and voting in another unit, and allocation of votes in which political agents and electoral officials simply connive to allocate agreed number of votes to political parties regardless of number of votes cast. Card Raders in particular would verify if the PVC belongs to the bearer or if it is cloned, thereby checking impersonation and counterfeiting during elections. The Supreme Court of Nigeria, however, declared the use of PVC and CR in the March/April 2015 election illegal when over-voting was discovered in the Southeast and South-south, excluding Edo State, where the conduct of elections were based on manually prepared voters' register. It took over a year after the election before the Supreme Court of Nigeria could decide that voters' register, even if it contained goats and chickens as eligible voters, was superior to Card Readers. That was why the Supreme Court of Nigeria reversed the 27 January 2016 ruling of the Appeal court which had nullified the Governorship and State Assembly election of Rivers State on the ground that number of votes counted and announced as results outrageously exceeded what were recorded by Card Readers.  Therefore, comparing Kenya Supreme Court Judges with those in Nigeria is not only wrong but dishonest.


Concerning the DSS operations on Judges in Nigeria, their counterparts in Kenya would have acted in the same way if Kenya Judges openly sell judgments to the highest bidder as it has been in Nigeria. After the DSS raid, two affected Justices of the Supreme Court wrote to the Nigerian Judicial Council (NJC) to explain the sources of the huge amount of money, both in US dollars and naira, recovered from their homes by DSS. While Justice Inyang Ikoro wrote that the dollars were unexpended part of his estacode for medical treatments abroad that he had been saving, Justice Sylvester Nwali Ngwuta on his part claimed that the money found in his house was made from selling rice and palm oil. Before the admission of the Justices to the ownership of the huge amount of money found by DSS in their homes, some people on this forum alleged that the DSS had planted the money in the homes of the Justices to incriminate them. Yet, we all know that a successful Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) does not know law, but he knows  Court Registrars and Judges. It is a mystery that those who are awed by the DSS's raid are not concerned about the eyes-popping wealth of Judicial Officers in Nigeria who collect huge bribes from national looters to adjourn cases indefinitely, dismiss cases and issue perpetual injunctions against the arrest, interrogation and prosecution of looters by the law enforcing agencies. One of the judges whose home was raided by the DSS in 2016 was Justice I.A. Umezulike, the Chief Judge of Enugu. Barrister Peter Eze had petitioned the DSS, EFCC, ICPC and NJC accusing Justice Umezulike of abuse of judicial power against two defendants in suits Nos. E/6/2013 and E/88/2016. The Chief Judge clung to the two suits to remain in his court, despite all genuine efforts by the defendants to get the suit transferred to another court. The plaintiff in the two cases was Prince Arthur Eze, one of the Southeast marginalized billionaire tycoon allocated with oil block OML 109, located just 12 miles off the shores of Nigeria, encompassing some 773 square kilometres with estimated 2.2 billion barrels of crude oil. While Justice Umezulikke was adjudicating on the two cases in which Prince Arthur Eze was a party, the Chief Judge had a book launch and Prince Arthur Eze attended and donated ten million naira (N10 million) for the book launch. With that donation, Prince Arthur Eze, indirectly, had purchased favourable judgements in the two cases pending before the honourable Judge, which was why he refused to transfer the cases to another court. So, when the DSS raided the home of the Chief Judge of Enugu State, Justice I. A. Umezulike, it was not because he had pronounced any judgment against the Federal Government, but because he was engaged in cash and carry judgments like most of the Nigerian judicial officers. He was subsequently recommended for dismissal by the Nigerian Judicial Council which is the only penalty for criminal judges in Nigeria.


In December 2015, the Chairman of the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), Mr. Ekpo Nta, revealed that the ICPC was prosecuting over 400 corruption-related cases in various courts in the country and he blamed the judiciary for impeding prosecution and judgments. In view of that, Ibrahim Magu, the Acting Chairman of EFCC, whose experience was similar to that of Mr. Nta, suggested a legislation that would fix a time frame within which corruption cases should be heard and determined by the judiciary. The Senate responded by declaring Ibrahim Magu unfit to be the Chairman of EFCC. Could that happen in Kenya?

S. Kadiri  
 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 2 september 2017 00:16
Till: USA Africa Dialogue Series
Ämne: USA Africa Dialogue Series - FW: Kenya's Supreme Court has cancelled Kenya's election, orders new election within 60 days
 
If it were in Nigeria, there would have been midnight raids by a combined team of DSS and EFCC on the homes of the Judges by now under the guise of anti- corruption.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com 
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue

Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.



Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.



Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Sep 8, 2017, 4:25:16 AM9/8/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
Stockholm, Friday morning, 8th September, 2017
If it were in Nigeria, there would have been midnight raids by a combined team of DSS and EFCC on the homes of the Judges by now under the guise of anti- corruption.” (A bitter and very pessimistic Chidi Anthony Opara) … as Brother Dylan put it and we can be sure that Baba Kadiri agrees from within

False-hearted judges dying in the webs that they spin

 Only a matter of time ’til night comes steppin’ in” (Jokerman)

Well, in Benin, Voodoo is one of the official state religions  whereas in in the Federal Republic of Nigeria what is popularly/ unpopularly  known in the missionary West as “voodoo” “/“Juju” /“witchcraft” has not quite attained that kind of official status yet ;I begin with this preamble before quoting Quran and in this case the Bible ( the so called “ New” testament) that, “a prophet has no honor in his own country” (in advance,  Jesus perhaps justifying his own rejection by his own people, whilst he was still alive)…as when predicting imminent future disaster/ under-development, corruption  and incompetence  politicians and commentators alike tend to put on some kind of prophetic toga ( even if Muslims among them know and understand that Muhammad Ibn Abdallah ( S.a.w.) was and is the LAST PROPHET! )

But unlike Baba Kadiri, Chidi was not revisiting the past. That was merely Chidi’s devilish, nightmare premonitions about a worst case scenario in his native land. I’m as surprised as Chidi, in fact aren’t we all surprised about that Supreme Court decision in Kenya  or in any other African country for that matter, where on the one hand they preach and pay lip service to “the separation of powers” even when the actual praxis is that whatever incumbent president (Brother Buhari a notable exception) most other African presidents that we know of in the present and in the past, usually have the Supreme Court in their back pockets.

However, the assassination of a key electoral officer  - with the key to the electoral data bank, that must have been the smoking gun, leaving the Supreme Court no alternative but to bite the bullet and declare the vote null and void!

Here’s some revisiting the past, perhaps even reinventing that history  as Victor Oguejiofor Okafor does,  so succinctly and poignantly here  in his “Nigeria’s disputed Elections and the Resulting Leadership legitimacy crisis” he said:  In the final analysis Ex-President Obasanjo should realize that electoral crimes are also grave acts of corruption.   Gaining political office by snatching ballot boxes and by filling ballot boxes with fake votes is as unconstitutional as seizing the reins of government with the gun – and should be considered and treated as treasonable

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Sep 8, 2017, 7:49:16 AM9/8/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
When crooks are elected as lawmakers what manner of law making and administration of justice can be expected if not crooked!

The day of reckoning is less than two years and the people are waiting.

If takes a total fumigation of the NASS with fresh untainted blood then so be it.

The nation is blessed with over a hundred and eighty million  souls; It cant be an impossibility to find less than a thousand untainted souls to fill the legislative houses anew.

And that -is the beauty of democracy in action!



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Salimonu Kadiri <ogunl...@hotmail.com>
Date: 06/09/2017 20:52 (GMT+00:00)
Subject: SV: USA Africa Dialogue Series - FW: Kenya's Supreme Court hascancelled  Kenya's election, orders new election within 60 days

Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (ogunl...@hotmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

When prejudice influences poetry, the truth suffers as a result. In the Nigerian legal system of limitless Maradona-dribbling, it is impossible for the Supreme Court in Nigeria to adjudicate and conclude proceedings in a Presidential election petition within a month after election result has been announced. Corruption and abuse of judicial power is 98% greater in Nigeria than in Kenya. In Nigeria, Presidential election petition must start from the election tribunal which will spend not less than ten months to auction judgment to the highest bidder and will proceed from there to the Appeal Court which will spend almost a year to sell judgment to the highest bidder before the appeal can land at the Supreme Court for final hearing and judgment in favour of the person who pays more. Let me clarify with examples.


In the Gubernatorial election of Anambra State, in 2003, Dr Chris Ngige of the PDP was declared a winner against Peter Obi of APGA. While the election petition dragged on, Dr. Ngige reneged on his agreement with his sponsor to the election victory, Chris Uba, (whose brother was special assistant to President Obasanjo) to give him a chunk of monthly revenue allocation to the state from the Federal government. Dr. Ngige wanted the entire allocation to be used for the  development of Anambra State. When all means to intimidate Dr. Ngige to comply with Chris Uba failed, the latter went to the Appeal Court to witness in favour of Peter Obi of APGA. Chris Uba revealed how election sheets were toe and finger thumbed before the election date in Anambra in which Dr. Ngige was declared Governor elected. Although Chris Uba was not prosecuted for perpetrating electoral fraud, the Supreme Court dismissed Dr. Ngige from office in 2005 and declared Peter Obi as the winner of 2003 Gubernatorial election. In 2007, Dr. Andy Nnamdi Uba, as he titled himself then, contested for the Governorship of Anambra State on the platform of PDP and he was declared a winner with 1.9 million votes. Some days after the election result, Uba's opponents discovered that the total number of voters in the register was 1.7 million and Professor Maurice Iwu's INEC quickly adjusted Dr. Andy Nnamdi Uba's winning votes to one million. One Mr. Greg Ikemefuna filed a court suit alleging that Dr. Andy Nnamdi Uba was not qualified to contest the Gubernatorial election because he did not attend any of the three Universities, and did not obtain any doctorate degree in 1996, as he claimed, filled and signed in INEC Form 001. The Universities Dr(?) Andy Nnamdi Uba claimed he attended in INEC Form 001 were Concordia University, Montreal , Canada, California State University, Los Angeles, and Buxton University, London. Mr. Greg Ikemefuna secured a letter from the UK Department of Education and Skills revealing that Buxton University did not exist. When Andy Nnamdi Uba was eventually eased out of office, it was because the election that threw him up as Governor should not have taken place, in view of the fact that, constitutionally, the four years tenure of Peter Obi started in 2005 when he was first sworn in and the next Gubernatorial election should, therefore, be 2009. The case of Andy Nnamdi Uba's false academic claim, has since been swept under the carpet by the court and he is now a Senator making laws for Nigerians.


Still in Anambra, it was discovered that the election that threw up Willy Obiano as the Governor of the State in 2013 contained illegal voters. For instance, a bowl of rice was registered with, a given date of birth, profession as a civil servant, sex as a male and was permitted to vote in the election. The election result was, however, legalized by the Supreme Court of Nigeria. 


In preparation for the March/April 2015 Federal and state  Elections, INEC announced that the elections would be conducted with the aid of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) and Card Readers. Devices that were intended to eliminate multiple voting, irregular voting i.e. registering in one unit and voting in another unit, and allocation of votes in which political agents and electoral officials simply connive to allocate agreed number of votes to political parties regardless of number of votes cast. Card Raders in particular would verify if the PVC belongs to the bearer or if it is cloned, thereby checking impersonation and counterfeiting during elections. The Supreme Court of Nigeria, however, declared the use of PVC and CR in the March/April 2015 election illegal when over-voting was discovered in the Southeast and South-south, excluding Edo State, where the conduct of elections were based on manually prepared voters' register. It took over a year after the election before the Supreme Court of Nigeria could decide that voters' register, even if it contained goats and chickens as eligible voters, was superior to Card Readers. That was why the Supreme Court of Nigeria reversed the 27 January 2016 ruling of the Appeal court which had nullified the Governorship and State Assembly election of Rivers State on the ground that number of votes counted and announced as results outrageously exceeded what were recorded by Card Readers.  Therefore, comparing Kenya Supreme Court Judges with those in Nigeria is not only wrong but dishonest.


Concerning the DSS operations on Judges in Nigeria, their counterparts in Kenya would have acted in the same way if Kenya Judges openly sell judgments to the highest bidder as it has been in Nigeria. After the DSS raid, two affected Justices of the Supreme Court wrote to the Nigerian Judicial Council (NJC) to explain the sources of the huge amount of money, both in US dollars and naira, recovered from their homes by DSS. While Justice Inyang Ikoro wrote that the dollars were unexpended part of his estacode for medical treatments abroad that he had been saving, Justice Sylvester Nwali Ngwuta on his part claimed that the money found in his house was made from selling rice and palm oil. Before the admission of the Justices to the ownership of the huge amount of money found by DSS in their homes, some people on this forum alleged that the DSS had planted the money in the homes of the Justices to incriminate them. Yet, we all know that a successful Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) does not know law, but he knows  Court Registrars and Judges. It is a mystery that those who are awed by the DSS's raid are not concerned about the eyes-popping wealth of Judicial Officers in Nigeria who collect huge bribes from national looters to adjourn cases indefinitely, dismiss cases and issue perpetual injunctions against the arrest, interrogation and prosecution of looters by the law enforcing agencies. One of the judges whose home was raided by the DSS in 2016 was Justice I.A. Umezulike, the Chief Judge of Enugu. Barrister Peter Eze had petitioned the DSS, EFCC, ICPC and NJC accusing Justice Umezulike of abuse of judicial power against two defendants in suits Nos. E/6/2013 and E/88/2016. The Chief Judge clung to the two suits to remain in his court, despite all genuine efforts by the defendants to get the suit transferred to another court. The plaintiff in the two cases was Prince Arthur Eze, one of the Southeast marginalized billionaire tycoon allocated with oil block OML 109, located just 12 miles off the shores of Nigeria, encompassing some 773 square kilometres with estimated 2.2 billion barrels of crude oil. While Justice Umezulikke was adjudicating on the two cases in which Prince Arthur Eze was a party, the Chief Judge had a book launch and Prince Arthur Eze attended and donated ten million naira (N10 million) for the book launch. With that donation, Prince Arthur Eze, indirectly, had purchased favourable judgements in the two cases pending before the honourable Judge, which was why he refused to transfer the cases to another court. So, when the DSS raided the home of the Chief Judge of Enugu State, Justice I. A. Umezulike, it was not because he had pronounced any judgment against the Federal Government, but because he was engaged in cash and carry judgments like most of the Nigerian judicial officers. He was subsequently recommended for dismissal by the Nigerian Judicial Council which is the only penalty for criminal judges in Nigeria.


In December 2015, the Chairman of the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), Mr. Ekpo Nta, revealed that the ICPC was prosecuting over 400 corruption-related cases in various courts in the country and he blamed the judiciary for impeding prosecution and judgments. In view of that, Ibrahim Magu, the Acting Chairman of EFCC, whose experience was similar to that of Mr. Nta, suggested a legislation that would fix a time frame within which corruption cases should be heard and determined by the judiciary. The Senate responded by declaring Ibrahim Magu unfit to be the Chairman of EFCC. Could that happen in Kenya?

S. Kadiri  
 



Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 2 september 2017 00:16
Till: USA Africa Dialogue Series
Ämne: USA Africa Dialogue Series - FW: Kenya's Supreme Court has cancelled Kenya's election, orders new election within 60 days
 
If it were in Nigeria, there would have been midnight raids by a combined team of DSS and EFCC on the homes of the Judges by now under the guise of anti- corruption.

CAO.

Chidi Anthony Opara

unread,
Sep 8, 2017, 9:39:25 AM9/8/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com
Lest I forget, if it were in Nigeria, Buhari's secret police (DSS) and his attack dog (EFCC), would have also discovered large sums of monies in different major world currencies belonging to the main opposition leader and his associates.

CAO.
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/usaafricadialogue/PPZLYWVjS5o/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Sep 8, 2017, 5:10:41 PM9/8/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

Auden: "The few shall be taught who want to understand

Really real: I was sure that Victor Oguejiofor Okafor would have and should have taken some flak for saying that ”seizing the reins of government with the gun … should be considered and treated as treasonable” and I guess that the guilty ones according to him should thereby face annihilation by firing squad? If the people are suffering endlessly, in a country saddled with a corrupt government and sitting on top of the pile is a president for life, one rigged election after another, should it be OK for a redeemer army-man to intervene with the aim of restoring democracy and ending the shuffering and shmiling?

About the beginning/ beginnings, “the first cause” and all that jazz, there’s this Joel Osteen joke about the scientist who challenged the Almighty . Nowadays, not only the scientists, even some of the historians of today are challenging the scriptures  about the age of mankind for example,  since according to the Hebrew calendar we are now living in the year 5,777 since the creation

And just as we have listened patiently to Alagba Falola's philosophical excursions into the theology of what can and what cannot be done with history in spite of the well-known ideogram, " With God all things are possible" not to mention several instances of God's Divine Intervention in  the history of Israel - the flood, the burning bush, the ten plagues, the birth of the Israeli nation at Mt. Sinai, at some time God defying the very laws of physics by making the sun stand still, so too in the world of nature,  “necessity is the mother of invention " applies and that is why and how we have coups : The sometimes divine intervention or  intrusion if you like, of The Military into politics such as Blaise Compaoré’s coup of August 4, 1983 which freed Captain Thomas Sankara from prison and installed him as President of Burkina Faso. Later,  another wannabe redeemer, Brother Buhari  - as General Muhammadu Buhari and his side-man Major General Tunde Idiagbon on the last day of 1983 just as  Flt. Lieutenant Jeremiah Rawlings before him, also on the last day of 1981, with the intention of changing the course of history  - from  what had been occurring in the past, changing  "the system” ( the old corrupt system) by trying to create  a better alternative future – at the cusp of the old year and ushering in the new beginnings, some real “ Happy New Year”…

Chidi, the guises are many – in some other West African country  more than a decade earlier, the president’s attack dogs would not have “ discovered large sums of monies in different major world currencies belonging to the main opposition leader and his associates” – in fact they "discovered" a large cache of explosives and ammunition in the garage and house of some prominent opposition leader or other  ( planted there by the Pa of course)  so that he could go on national television – show up the evidence  and start wailing that the treacherous  and treasonous opposition leader and colleagues had confessed  plan to blow up the presidential villa and the house of parliament : therefore in the interests of  peace and stability in the beloved country, and to rid the beloved country of such vermin,  they should be deserving of the death penalty,  either death by hanging or by lining  them up  to  face the  musical firing squad, fait accompli

Auto Generated Inline Image 1

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Sep 9, 2017, 6:41:36 PM9/9/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Lest we forget, DSS and EFCC existed during Olusegun Obasnjo's PDP led federal government from 1999. Lest we forget, the PDP ruled Nigeria from 29 May 1999 to 29 May 2015, making a total of 16 years. Lest we forget, Buhari was sworn in as the President of Nigeria on 29 May 2015. Lest we forget, most of the EFCC cases against corrupt PDP-political office holders began in 2007 and are still ongoing. Lets we forget, most of the corrupt PDP-political office holders being tried in the courts throughout the nation have now crossed over to the APC but cases of corruption against them have not been withdrawn. Lest we forget, it was not Buhari's EFCC who charged James Onanefe Ibori to court for stealing £265 million from Delta State Treasury during his eight years tenure as Governor of the State, but Jonathan's EFCC. Lest we forget, it was not Buhari's EFCC that arraigned a marginalised South-easterner and former Governor of Abia State (1999-2007), Orji Uzor Kalu, before an Abuja High Court on 27 July 2007 on a 107-count charge of money laundering, official corruption and criminal diversion of public funds in excess of N5 billion, but Yar'Adua's EFCC. Lest we forget, the EFCC  accused Kalu of transferring billions of naira belonging to the Abia State government to his Slok Airlines. He was accused of transferring the funds over a period of time from the defunct Manny Bank (later merged with Fidelity Bank) to Slok's account at Inland Bank. Lest we forget, he was also alleged, between 1999 and 2007, to have removed various sums of government money into Slok Investment, Slok Nigeria Limited, Slok Incorporated all owned by him. Lest we forget, Orji Uzor Kalu admitted in court that the N 5 billion naira he transferred to his private companies' account from Abia State account was from security votes and since security votes are unaccountable and unretired-able, he had the right as Governor to disburse the security votes as he did. Lest we forget, the case is still in court even though Orji Uzor Kalu has now crossed from PDP to APC. Lest we forget, the economic situation which Nigerians are complaining about today are not caused by Buhari's administration and commonsense demands that the political party that ruled Nigeria for 16 years, until 29 May 2015, should be made to account for their stewardship while in power. 

S. Kadiri     
 




Skickat: den 8 september 2017 15:37
Till: usaafric...@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: FW: Kenya's Supreme Court has cancelled Kenya's election, orders new election within 60 days
 
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Sep 10, 2017, 6:27:44 AM9/10/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Olayinka Agbetuyi
You are indeed right.  We dont know why Chidi Anthony Opara chose not to see DSS as the secret police of the PDP presidents who inaugurated the outfit and used it to investigate most of the unconcluded cases in court.  

Neither do we know why Chidi sees EFCC as President Buhari's attack dog when as far as institutions of government goes Buhari is merely continuing a tradition of accountability he met on the ground used in a similar fashion by President Jonathan.



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Salimonu Kadiri <ogunl...@hotmail.com>
Date: 09/09/2017 23:56 (GMT+00:00)
Subject: SV: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: FW: Kenya's Supreme Court hascancelled  Kenya's election, orders new election within 60 days

Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (ogunl...@hotmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

Lest we forget, DSS and EFCC existed during Olusegun Obasnjo's PDP led federal government from 1999. Lest we forget, the PDP ruled Nigeria from 29 May 1999 to 29 May 2015, making a total of 16 years. Lest we forget, Buhari was sworn in as the President of Nigeria on 29 May 2015. Lest we forget, most of the EFCC cases against corrupt PDP-political office holders began in 2007 and are still ongoing. Lets we forget, most of the corrupt PDP-political office holders being tried in the courts throughout the nation have now crossed over to the APC but cases of corruption against them have not been withdrawn. Lest we forget, it was not Buhari's EFCC who charged James Onanefe Ibori to court for stealing £265 million from Delta State Treasury during his eight years tenure as Governor of the State, but Jonathan's EFCC. Lest we forget, it was not Buhari's EFCC that arraigned a marginalised South-easterner and former Governor of Abia State (1999-2007), Orji Uzor Kalu, before an Abuja High Court on 27 July 2007 on a 107-count charge of money laundering, official corruption and criminal diversion of public funds in excess of N5 billion, but Yar'Adua's EFCC. Lest we forget, the EFCC  accused Kalu of transferring billions of naira belonging to the Abia State government to his Slok Airlines. He was accused of transferring the funds over a period of time from the defunct Manny Bank (later merged with Fidelity Bank) to Slok's account at Inland Bank. Lest we forget, he was also alleged, between 1999 and 2007, to have removed various sums of government money into Slok Investment, Slok Nigeria Limited, Slok Incorporated all owned by him. Lest we forget, Orji Uzor Kalu admitted in court that the N 5 billion naira he transferred to his private companies' account from Abia State account was from security votes and since security votes are unaccountable and unretired-able, he had the right as Governor to disburse the security votes as he did. Lest we forget, the case is still in court even though Orji Uzor Kalu has now crossed from PDP to APC. Lest we forget, the economic situation which Nigerians are complaining about today are not caused by Buhari's administration and commonsense demands that the political party that ruled Nigeria for 16 years, until 29 May 2015, should be made to account for their stewardship while in power. 

S. Kadiri     
 



Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi...@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 8 september 2017 15:37
Till: usaafric...@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: FW: Kenya's Supreme Court has cancelled Kenya's election, orders new election within 60 days
 
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages