Emir Sanusi on Polygamy, Procreation, and Poverty

70 views
Skip to first unread message

Moses Ebe Ochonu

unread,
Feb 22, 2017, 12:42:30 PM2/22/17
to USAAfricaDialogue


Emir Muhammadu Sanusi of Kano recently caused controversy by proposing a new Islamic family law to regulate polygamy, which he linked to unregulated procreation, poverty, juvenile delinquency, and terrorism.

In principle, I agree with the emir of Kano's pronouncement on polygamy, procreation, and poverty. However, there is need to proceed with caution on the legislative intervention he is proposing. I am not Muslim or Hausa so I may not be able to speak to the theological and cultural issue at stake. However, I do know that our societies in Africa are driven by patriarchy and notions of masculine pride and dignity. This culture tends to mediate how people see these things.

Like the emir, I used to display an unqualified intolerance for people who want to bring many children into this world despite lacking the means to care for them. I used to preach vehemently and somewhat haughtily against unbridled procreation among my own poor extended family. 

Then I decided to scold this stubborn member of the family, a primary school teacher who insisted, as he put it, on having as many children as God would give him, despite clearly not having the means to care for them. Several people in our family had spoken to him to no avail.

Because I was occasionally supporting him financially I felt that I had some leverage and sway with him and could convince him to see what every other person was seeing and drop his policy of unrestrained procreation. The first time I talked to him, he listened to my long speech and politely promised to look into the matter.

A couple of years and another child later, I decided to confront him again on the issue. Everyone felt that he would only listen to me. This time he was ready for me, fuming while listening to me. Because he is much older than me, I took his fuming to be a response to my tone and decided to persuade him rather than scold him for his choice. 

When my sermon was over, he cleared his throat and declared that he too had something to say to me. He said essentially that as a man, a man of our ethnic group, there are two things that one aspires to possess in abundance: wealth and children. These two possessions or at least one of them, he said, made one a man. He said he didn't have money and could never be wealthy, having become too old for wealth to happen to him. All he had left to demonstrate his masculinity in order not to be considered a failure in life was to have as many children as he could have and to be remembered for being blessed with children when he is gone. He said people like me who "have money" would not understand, since we already had the ability to possess the two gold standards of manly success. He said if he had money like me, my advice would make sense and he would not need to have many children.

Folks like him, he said, will have lived unremarkable, vain lives if they did not procreate liberally when they were on this earth. With my wealth (he saw me as wealthy) I was already guaranteed respect as a man, and regardless of how many children I have, I was assured of maximum cultural capital as a man, as well as a legacy. He then tried to appeal to my clan pride. He said I was a small boy, that I didn't know that our lineage had been depleted by untimely deaths and needed to be repopulated, and that I should appreciate and support his effort to assure the lineage of continuity and human capital in the future. Finally, he asked if I didn't think it was mean and selfish of me, a successful man assured of recognition and respect, to stop him from fulfilling his manly destiny the only way he could still do so. He was accusing me of trying to stop him from getting to where I was--a place of masculine accomplishment as defined by our culture. He was accusing me of trying to kick away the proverbial ladder that got me to the place of respect he imagined me to occupy. 

I was humbled. I piped down. He had successfully emotionally blackmailed me. He had turned the leverage I thought I had on him against me. I came into the conversation on the offensive. He had put me on the defensive. I now had to reassure him that I was not out to keep him from building a legacy of masculine accomplishment. Even though I still disagreed fundamentally with his rationalization of his unbridled procreation, he made sense from a purely cultural perspective, the most dominant frame of reference available to him.

We agreed to disagree on the issue, and I told him that he would see my point in the future and that I hoped that he would not regret shunning my advice.

Even though we parted on a note of disagreement, I came away with a better appreciation for where he was coming from, for his masculine anxieties, and for the unspoken patriarchal cultural pressures against which he was struggling, and which were unfortunately determining his procreation decision.

I knew that he was speaking from a well established cultural script. In my village in Benue state, a man considered successful in the old days would boast that he had money and he had many children, meaning that he was complete. I connected what he had said to this manly tradition of success and fulfilment.

I realized that as personal as this issue may seem, it is deeply interwoven with our society's notions of masculinity and masculine pride, and that unless the culture evolves persons operating solely within it may never be persuaded to act outside of its dictates.


Kenneth Harrow

unread,
Feb 22, 2017, 5:55:48 PM2/22/17
to usaafricadialogue

It’s very difficult for many people to see issues outside their own narrow cultural orbit.

It also takes a small amount of facts to determine how overpopulation impacts the larger community, the state, the continent, the world. We have a finite world, with far too many people in it, given our resources. We’ll go own increasing demands for energy and food, demands on water, and  go on hearing meaningless responses, like, look how much land there is. that’s like saying the earth is flat because it looks that way.

When we refuse an inoculation for our child, thinking we are protecting it, we endanger all children. We need to think in community terms on a planetary scale. Arguments in favor of ethnic or cultural exceptionalism only damage everyone.

Lastly, arguing to a muslim that they can’t take more than one wife accords with the qur’an which states you can’t marry more than one woman unless you can afford to pay all the necessary expenses. If people ignore that injunction, they violate a reasonable law, as if they are somehow exceptions.

 

If we think of ourselves as belonging to one large family, then we have to accept the demands of the whole family, not just our immediate family.

That means u.s. wealth and western wealth can’t go just to our citizens; it also means what one member of the family decides to do impacts all of us.

Ken

 

 

Kenneth Harrow

Dept of English and Film Studies

Michigan State University

619 Red Cedar Rd

East Lansing, MI 48824

517-803-8839

har...@msu.edu

http://www.english.msu.edu/people/faculty/kenneth-harrow/

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Olayinka Agbetuyi

unread,
Feb 23, 2017, 5:46:08 AM2/23/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Lets put the Emir of Kano's comments in its right perspective. No Emir can sit in Nigeria and change Islamic Law  since it did not originate in Nigeria so his alienated comment is simply a figment of his own imagination.  Islamic Law is theological in nature and he owes his position in the Nigerian society to that Law. 

In the ideal world religious considerations would not form the basis of societal laws; paradoxically societies do not function outside religions.  But I do know that a considerable part of western laws and jurisprudence derive their basis from Cannon Law which is religious in origins (extensions from the Bible and the Mosaic Ten Commandments). 

 I recall the Biblical injunction that states that the world and all that resides therein belong to the Lord (meaning Jewish God -Yahweh) and that the Jews should sally forth to all corners of the world beget and flourish and extend their populations all over the globe.

Yes the Quoran did not impose polygamy on anybody but those who could afford it(or think they could, including those thinking their not-so-rosy present circumstances would change in the future) choose to adopt it.

No. Its not only men who relish procreating in abundance to boost their masculine egos. I shared a cab with a woman 20 yrs ago in London who boasted of having ten children.  She goes around to the flats of each of her daughters to give them some support  with their kids and spoke with the pride of an accomplished woman.  She was middle aged Middle Eastern and on welfare.

I know the Irish communities favour large families of up to 10 or 13 children per woman believing that contraception is against the law of God.

The mindset of Moses's relative reflects a view in rural communities in which abundance of children help on the farms and can be the basis of future wealth of the parent in terms of the increase in yield consequent on the expansion of human labor.  If the children are adequately trained  (not necessarily only in western education) it can boost the the cooperative financial output of the extended family or clan.




Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Feb 24, 2017, 7:10:41 PM2/24/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

A bat cannot be classified purely as a bird or as a mouse just like Nigeria cannot be classified purely as a Republic or as a Monarchy. That there are monarchs in the Federal Republic of Nigeria is just a demonstration of the political insanity reigning in the country. Emir Sanusi, the monarch of Kano is not entitled to talk on polygamy, procreation and poverty either in his emirate or in Nigeria as whole. He cannot undo us and be our sympathiser at the same time.


As late Chinua Achebe observed in his, Ant Hills of Savanah, the colonial master met two twins in Nigeria, and made one a president and the other a shit carrier. Expanding further on his observation, I would add that the one that was made President had seen to it that the families from the generation of his twin brother remain shit carriers while the President's families are prosperous. All Nigerians, from the beginning, were poor or rich but now Nigerians are divided into impoverished masses and a few minority rich.


Tradition or culture in any society is a function of industrial and economic development. That is why tradition and culture change with industrial and economic development. Despite large numbers of Western educated Nigerians, the traditional and cultural belief in rearing children as insurance towards old age that typified agrararian society still exist today. The more children you have, it is believed that, at least, one will succeed economically to take care of the family, both near and extended. Emphasis on procreation is even more pronounced in Nigeria today because pensioners from states and federal government do not get their pensions when due.


Family Planning Council of Nigeria (FPCN) was formed in 1964 and during the military era, the name was changed to Planned Parenthood Federation of Nigeria (PPFN). Donor agencies to PPFN are United Nations Population Fund (UNPF), European Union, Department For International Development (DFID) of the British Council and Shell Petroleum Development Corporation (SPDC). PPFN has 75 clinics spread over 36 states in Nigeria. Under the pretext of combating invented soaring maternal mortality, the PPFN aggressively conduct abortion, sterilization of women and operation of contraceptives into women. The new name for family planning in Nigeria, as in many third-world countries, is Reproductive Health Care.


In 1987, General Ibrahim Babangida's led federal government, through his Minster of Health, Professor Olikoye Ransom Kuti, and the United States Agencies for International Development (USAID), spent N228 million on Babagida's government population policy of one-woman-four-children. Through his Minister of Health, Professor Eyitan Lambo, President Olusegun Obasanjo introduced a new population policy of one-man-four children. Neither Babangida nor Obasanjo's government population policy was obeyed by the educated elites not to talk of illiterates that make up majority of the population of the country. Nigeria, at moment, is not suffering from overpopulation but unjust distribution of our collective patrimony. In the Northern part of Nigeria, particularly, the Governors are used to collecting revenue allocations from the Federal government, but instead of investing the funds on education and welfare of their people, they steal the entire federal allocations. Most of them travel to Mecca every week for Friday's prayer. When their people complain of poverty, they respond : Allah Ta Rago, meaning God is the defender of the poor. Not less than 17 former Governors from Northern Nigeria, have been arraigned and charged to court for plundering their states of billions of naira. In fact, 12 of these Governors are from Sharia ruled States but they are not being tried in Sharia courts where they would have had their hands amputated long time ago.


Kenneth wrote, "When we refuse an inoculation for our child, thinking we are protecting it, we endanger all children." I read through the article of Moses, to which Kenneth is responding, and I could not find anything relating to refusal to inoculate our child. Can you please help me solve the riddle, "we refuse an inoculation for our child?"

S. Kadiri   
 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Kenneth Harrow <har...@msu.edu>
Skickat: den 22 februari 2017 18:58
Till: usaafricadialogue
Ämne: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Emir Sanusi on Polygamy, Procreation, and Poverty
 

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Feb 25, 2017, 5:11:03 AM2/25/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

The very first line of Oliver Goldsmith's The Vicar of Wakefield : "I was ever of opinion, that the honest man who married and brought up a large family, did more service than he who continued single, and only talked of population. "

Speaking here as a free electron, not chained, a mystic if you like, I am not aware that the Almighty commanded "that the Jews should sally forth to all corners of the world beget and flourish and extend their populations all over the globe."

Such a perception is at the heart of much misunderstanding. We know this much about Adam (the legendary early family of mankind )

"And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and rule over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the sky and over all the beasts that tread upon the earth. " (Genesis 1: 26- 28). It's important to know that Adam was not Jewish and that it was only after Adam failed in his mission and long after that generation that Abraham - the first so called "Jew" was entrusted with the reconstituted mission that was originally Adam's - and that of course Israel was the promised land by which I understand that the Almighty did not command Abraham's offspring to " sally forth to all corners of the world" and conquer other lands etc. "and extend their populations all over the globe"

You (whoever you are) must admit that it should be difficult to contradict the Almighty's edict / executive order to "be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it" even if according to your estimation or prognosis the earth is already filled or at the breaking point of being overfilled so the cup to "runneth over". Just try telling that to some of the orthodox rabbis who are populating like rabbits and - with the decimation of world Jewry by six million souls so recently behind them continue to have large families forever aware & thinking about the so called demographic nightmare Palestinians about to drown them, they will probably ask you, " Who are you? Are you God? The Messiah?"

From that point of view it's probably unfair for example for that Cairo Conference on population to come out with such decrees or recommendations. There are many conspiracy theorists who believe that any talk of population control is calculated to severely weaken or reduce the growth of Muslim populations that would contribute significantly to the army of al-Islam - and for a very similar reason (self-interest) my radical Muslim friend says that he sells alcohol : "to weaken the kuffar"...

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Feb 25, 2017, 10:51:15 AM2/25/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

As the late great Cardinal Rex Lawson put it : Nah so a see am o!

Some obvious problems in the way

Re- Population control by not having so many wives and siring so many children - China is a practical example of population control by state legislation.

Should it be only the rich who should be permitted to have many children?

From the point of view of the Divine injunction to fill the earth, we are to suppose that on that score, the Almighty is happy with the sleeping giant, Nigeria and Nigerians. Despite decimation by the slave trade, war, famine, poverty and disease,Wallaahu rau’oofun bil ibaad - by the grace of our merciful God, the human race will not be extinguished in Nigeria. On the whole the statistics for population increase in Nigeria is encouraging: In 1960 Nigeria's population was about 33 million souls and in 2017 the challenge will be exceeding 185 million mouths to feed, clothe, provide potable water and electricity, shelter, educate , employ, as useful citizens etc.

In this forum there's often the good wishes extended from one person to another with these words :

"May your tribe increase"

Since Nigeria practices some form of representative democracy and governments are elected through the ballot box, one man one vote, every citizen over the age of eighteen eligible to cast their ballot - this means that given the fact that ethnicity, regionalism and religion are important factors, there must therefore be a conscious will for ethnic and religious groups in all the regions to want to increase their populations and thereby their influence through the ballot box. To tell Muslims that they must abandon the sunnah of polygamy/ being allowed a maximum of four wives if they can afford them - "and those that their right hand possess" should be counter-productive should they believe that this is a smart move by non-Muslims to severely curtail their potential for political power, even dominance - as indeed would be the case if Palestinians were told to please start having fewer babies (for whatever reason)

The solution of course is the evolution of the various part/ mansions of the federation into the consciousness of being one indivisible nation, i.e. that we are all in the same boat.

There's the catholic church and their laws and teaching about abortion, contraception etc., but since Catholics don't practice polygamy which is a main focus in this discussion it's worthwhile knowing a little about

Islam on contraception .

Prophet Muhammad on coitus interruptus .

A well known hadith is Rasulullah salallahu alaihi wa salaam being asked about contraception and replying that those souls that are destined to be born will be born, no matter what.

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Feb 25, 2017, 6:23:22 PM2/25/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Bubonic plague wiped out 33 per cent of European population in the 14th century and a century later Europe was overpopulated to the extent of exterminating the American, Australian and New Zealand aborigins and planting Europeans in those non-European territories. Yet, overpopulated Europe never practised polygamy. Thus polygamy has nothing to do with overpopulation. Family pattern in Europe of that time was not firmly established on a wife and a husband co-habiting as men challenged fellow men to duel on the right to copulate with available woman. The survivor of such duel was automatically embraced by the woman on whose duel was fought and after copulation and pregnancy, she was abandoned by the man who was out to look for another prey to copulate with.


In Africa, marriage between a man and woman was systematic and the practice of polygamy preceded the incursion of Islam in Africa. Marriage to more than one wife was not caused by a male's desire just to satisfy his sexual appetite but to procreate. In his racist tuned book titled : The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa, Lord Lugard could not help observing the following, "The custom, which seems fairly general among the negro tribes, of suckling a child for two or three years, during which a woman lives apart from her husband, tends to decrease population." The implication of what Lugard meant with 'during which a woman lives apart from her husband,' is that the man never had sexual intercourse for two or three years with the suckling mother. Polygamy, in reality, ensured that every female was mated. Even where a man was monogamous and the wife attained menopause, the wife would take initiative to get a wife that was still productive for the husband since she considered that continuous copulation of the husband with her at a menopause age constituted wasting of his sperm. In the culturally unpolluted Africa, sex was never considered a leisure time engagements but solely to procreate. There were no prostitutes in pre-colonial Africa. Sanusi probably fills his harem with 30 wives while advocating that other men should limit the number of their wives to one or two. What did he produce and sell in Nigeria to get the financial and economic power to marry more than a wife? He should love his neighbour as himself and in the absence of that, he should shut his mouth and keep a low profile.

S.Kadiri
 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 25 februari 2017 16:28
Till: USA Africa Dialogue Series

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Feb 25, 2017, 6:43:13 PM2/25/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
That is not the way to address the Emir Of Kano.

All he did was to make some serious suggestions as to how to help solve a problem that's surely looming over his country. You could disagree with him, but politely...

Ibrahim Abdullah

unread,
Feb 25, 2017, 9:12:00 PM2/25/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com
What Africa are you talking about? Before 1500 or after 1500?

Very unhelpful when you invoke Africa as if there is an Africa out there or there was one out there!

The societies in the continent were always at different stages of development--especially after 1000 a.d. Uneven development was the norm; not the exception. 

The mythic Africa you referenced never existed!
----

Sent from my iPhone

Ademola Dasylva

unread,
Feb 26, 2017, 6:38:58 AM2/26/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series, Toyin Falola, Adeshina Afolayan
‎I quite agree with CH, it is shocking the way Ogbeni Kadiri addressed the Emir. That is not acceptable. We should tackle issues not personality, especially a royal institution at that. He should not have concluded with the rather offensive statement. I believe it should be retracted.  
 The issue at stake here is, of what use is a proven virility if it can not be sustained economically? What business has Ochonu's class teacher-uncle, or the Okada rider to do with harems  and forests of children if he is economically incapable of taking good care of them? You know as much as I do that many of those children end up on our streets as urchins, Alimajeris, and easy recruits for terrorism!
‎I suppose the thrust of Professor Ochonu's contribution is the tragic extent to which the practice of uncontrolled procreation is culturally rooted and, therefore, may be a difficult task to tackle in light of Emir Sanusi's proposed sponsored  bill at the State Assembly. But the point is, we cannot throw up our hands in total surrender and expect a miracle (the Nigerian way). The Emir's approach might just work, through an enforcement backed by law. I call it "the chloroquine treatment": a child that is suffering from malaria may naturally dislike any form of medication, especially, the  bitter  chloroquine tablets, or the painful injection. A good parent would rather force the medication administered on the child rather than lose him to a preventable death through malaria. Similarly, if some folks do not know what is good for them, the onus rests on the leaders to do something drastic about it. That way, our society is saved from the social menace. 
I think what we should address our mind to is how best to address the apparent social menace, religious or cultural sentiment apart. The Emir has hinted on the possibility of a bill to enforce responsible parenting, people may still come up with more realistic solutions,‎ not abuse, not insults.

Ademola O. Dasylva‎

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Cornelius Hamelberg
Sent: Sunday, 26 February 2017 00:43
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Emir Sanusi on Polygamy, Procreation, and Poverty

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Feb 26, 2017, 6:39:00 AM2/26/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Truly, there were different stages of developments among the inhabitants of Africa pre-1500 and after just as there were different stages of developments among the people of Europe and Asia.

The marriage custom and process in Yoruba land, for instance pre-dated, year 1500 and the incursion of Islam and Christianity in Nigeria. Also the circumcision of a male-child on the eighth day of its birth had nothing to do with Islam. May I inform you that the three essential qualities which are inherent in the Yoruba word BÀBÁ (father) are love, support and protection. Thus, the Yoruba word Bàbá, from antiquity to date, refers to a male-parent, who partakes in the actual conception and nurturing of a child together with his/her mother in decent socially acceptable marital union. In practice, Bàbá shows tremendous love and care to his child and can go to any length to ensure the child's survival. Bàbá is someone that, having fathered his child, can stake his life, resources and anything important to make that child happy. In the agrarian Yorubaland, a man was never allowed to marry, if he could not show how big his cassava and yam farms are as evidence of his ability to maintain a wife and subsequent child(ren). The larger a man's farms are, the more wives he is (allowed) qualified to marry. Polygamy in Yorubaland preceded the emergence of Islamic religion. Before the advent of colonialism there was no word in Yoruba language for prostitute as every adult female was mated. Was there any threat of overpopulation in Yorubaland? The answer is no, because a mother had to wrap the child at her back and suckle it for three years during which the husband never touched her sexually. Child spacing of three years prevented overpopulation. However, enemies of facts and slaves to lies would regard the above facts as myth which is why Nigeria continues to export prosperity and importing poverty.

S.Kadiri
 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Ibrahim Abdullah <ibdu...@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 26 februari 2017 01:34
Till: usaafric...@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Re: SV: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Emir Sanusi on Polygamy, Procreation, and Poverty
 

Kenneth Harrow

unread,
Feb 26, 2017, 2:04:04 PM2/26/17
to usaafricadialogue

Dear ademola

I think it is important to recognize the realities of population pressure. If I am rich and can afford to take care of more children, my decision to do so affects not just me and my family but the entire plantet. There are simple ethical responsibilities we all bear, and thinks like numbers of children and pollution are clear examples.

It troubles me when any group claims exceptional need for themselves, as if the rest of the world didn’t matter.

ken

 

Kenneth Harrow

Dept of English and Film Studies

Michigan State University

619 Red Cedar Rd

East Lansing, MI 48824

517-803-8839

har...@msu.edu

http://www.english.msu.edu/people/faculty/kenneth-harrow/

 

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Feb 26, 2017, 2:04:13 PM2/26/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Sorry Cornelius, I am not diplomatic but I am never rude to anybody irrespective of his/her class or rank in life. The Emir cannot undo us and be our sympathizer at the same time.

S.Kadiri
 




Skickat: den 26 februari 2017 00:41

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Feb 26, 2017, 2:04:29 PM2/26/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series



Ogbeni Kadiri,

I'm sure we too "hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Only last month the unprecedented was announced : the Buhari government was handing out 5,000 naira to each of the poorest in society. But Nigeria is not a social welfare state.

Bear with me.

As our man Einstein once asked,

"A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy?"

About this marriage business

" 1 to 1 is the Christian style, 4 to 1 is the Muslim style, 10 to 1 is grandpa’s style" (Demba Conta : School Days ) As you know, some guys are still on "grandpa’s style"

For sure, memory is sometimes a little hazy, but I seem to remember that during my time in Nigeria - or was it a little later, that a certain state government in Northern Nigeria issued an order that all single women of a marriageable age should either move home to their parents or get married within x number of days - or else! I remember thinking Lawd A Mercy, so all the ashawo man-hunters & toto-sellers should move home to their parents or get married immediately!

What if the parents are dead, what happens then? And what if the parents are divorced ? Maybe their parent/parents should also get married???? Can't remember if these single women - some with children - were threatened with long time imprisonment or paying with some lashes or some unpayable fines.

And these paradoxical line from the bard's cookbook:

"She's nobody's child
The Law can't touch her at all." (She belongs to me)

All said and done, it must have been a God-sent bonanza for some bachelors still shuffering and Shmiling in monkery (which is foreign to al-Islam) and some of the already married, to increase the number of their wives, "darling I'm arranging for some help in the kitchen". It must have generated a passionate social movement, I imagined a mass exodus of the locusts, up North, some of the prospective husbands converting to Islam en mass to get wedded in the same way that some of them converted in the 1980s, in order to get some foreign exchange to go to Riyadh...

Inevitably, the Emir of Kano's proposals are sure to generate some social upheavals. What's going to happen with the "surplus" women? Sadaqah?

Not so long ago : Kano State mass marriage program

Even more recently, somewhere this alternative was clear : Marry two wives or be jailed

It was St. Paul who said, " It's better to marry than to burn (with lust) or by " to burn" did he mean "to burn in the other fire (the hell fire) "?

Please be cognisant of this hard fact: The current Emir of Kano is both a traditionalist (the Sunnah) and a modernist, probably in tune with some of the reformists currents in Islam - to fit local exigencies. Na so a see am O!

You are particularly incensed that by that sort of law marriage should be only for the rich and not for the poor.

No doubt you are thinking about the fate of poor guys like myself who may be unmarried or who are already married, some to three, four, or more. Will such unions be disbanded by law, just because we are poor?

As Peter, Paul & Mary put it :

"If religion were a thing that money could buy,
The rich would live and the poor would die." (All my trials)

Joan Baez sings it a little differently:

"If living were a thing that money could buy
Then the rich would live and the poor would die"

Maybe a special fund should be set up to give financial assistance to young men and women who want to get married?

Personally I've always been somewhat distressed by the thesis that the current Emir of Kano Muhammadu Sanusi II putatively embraces, the thesis that poverty is a good breeding ground for terrorism , as he says in so many words here: “Those of us in the north have all seen the economic consequences of men who are not capable of maintaining one wife, marrying four. They end up producing 20 children, not educating them, leaving them on the streets, and they end up as thugs and terrorists."

Of course, he was speaking generally and he does know what he's talking about even if, as always there are exceptions to the rule as in the vase of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab , according to wikipedia : " Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab is the youngest of 16 children[7] of Alhaji Umaru Mutallab, a wealthy Nigerian banker and businessman, and is a son of his second wife, Aisha.[8] The father was described by The Times in 2009 as being "one of the richest men in Africa."[9] He is a former Chairman of First Bank of Nigeria and former Nigerian Federal Commissioner for Economic Development.[7][9][10]

The family comes from Funtua in Katsina State. Abdulmutallab was raised initially in an affluent neighbourhood of Kaduna,[11][12] in Nigeria's north,[7] and at the family home in Nairobi, Kenya.[13] He attended the Essence International School in Kaduna as a young child. He also took classes at the Rabiatu Mutallib Institute for Arabic and Islamic Studies, which had been named for his grandfather, at that time.[14] He also attended the The British School of Lomé, Togo.[15] Considered a gifted student, he also enjoyed playing PlayStation and basketball.[11] Abdulmutallab studied at University College London in September 2005, where he studied Engineering and Business Finance,[16] and earned a degree in mechanical engineering in June 2008.[17]

According to one of his cousins, as a teenager, Abdulmutallab became very pious as a Muslim, and detached himself from others of his age. He condemned his father's banking profession as "immoral" and "un-Islamic" for charging interest, urging him to quit. "That kind of detachment from others and singular focus on Islam was a common thread in Mr. Abdulmutallab's life, according to family members, friends and classmates."[11]





On Sunday, 26 February 2017 00:23:22 UTC+1, ogunlakaiye wrote:

szalanga

unread,
Feb 26, 2017, 4:03:57 PM2/26/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, Toyin Falola, Adeshina Afolayan
As someone who has been very interested in looking at history or life in Nigeria from the bottom up, not withstanding any disagreements that some would have with the Emir, which I am not surprise of, I still identify with him. Those who are waiting for a utopian perfect person will wait for a long time. 

It is always good to look at Nigeria or any culture from the perspective of ordinary people. In my hometown, in Bauchi state, my classmate and friend who has no job has more than 30 children. Some young men far younger than me have close to twenty. In a neoliberal economy, unfortunately  without human capital, without effective  consumer status or purchasing power, without producing something of value to the system or maybe being an entrepreneur, one is just a "SURPLUS PERSON" even in Nigeria. I am sorry to say this. I know all the God loves and he created us in his image talk since i was in children's Sunday  School. 

It seems like Nigerians wittingly or unwittingly have embraced capitalism and this is the logic of the system --' you have to have some market value else .....This is not nice to say but that is what the system is when fully deconstructed. Some in the north would say that giving birth to many children will help the Muslim population be more than Christians.  So religion is used as a defense mechanism. I have heard all these at grassroots level. 

 What I always tell people in Nigeria is that they absolutely have the right and maybe freedom to revert back to their cultural heritage for the past 2000 years out of pride and loyalty. I will have no problem with their  choice if they are serious and willing. I am personally not committed to such simplistic project. But I warn them that if they choose in any aspect or aspects of their lives to partake in the "evil" modern world they have to understand that in orider to be viable, serious or active players in the same modern world they hate, they need to understand the minimum basic requirements for functioning in the system.  This is necessary even  if they just want to change it. You can not change something meaningfully without knowing the logic informing the system very well. At least this is what is done in reversed engineering.

Nigerians also have the option of creating a UNIQUE African modernity but this even requires more serious work on the part of the leaders and people of Africa.  Currently I do not see much strength, energy and enthusiasm in this respect or direction. Many of the scholars that would want to contribute in such a project had to leave the continent and its holistic system of life to a different culture jus in order to thrive and flourish.  I find it simplistic when the religious persons in Africa can anoint a car or the microphone he or she uses in his or her worship  but never really receive an inspiration from whoever he or she worships to manufacture one. The spirit leads them to import.

People may feel offended with what the Emir said but for a person with villager and "campesino" background like me I understand full well the Emir's frustration. The average IQ performance of a Southern  child is higher than that of a northern child in Nigeria.  But this has nothing to do with some inherent lack of intelligence or ability of the northern  child.  If you list all the social and environmental factors that affect the development of a person's  intelligence the average northern child experiences higher disadvantages.  This has artificially created a situation that has  contributed to the retardation and even backwardness of northern Nigeria.  There is much  about this in the book authored by Professor Olufemi Vaughan titled "Religion and the Making of  Nigeria." 

At the current level and pace of development, the fertility rate in northern Nigeria is  not sustainable. My classmate cannot educate all his children.  Government schools are poorly maintained.  Whether he sleeps with his wives because he enjoys it or because of culturral obligation is indifferent to the problems of poor education of children in the  northern part of Nigeria contributing to the "surus population" and relative backwardress in the north. 

Whenever I travel in the north and see young girls selling peanuts or something similar I call them and pretend to buy. Then as I buy it i ask in Hausa whether the young girl often in hijab is going to school or not. Generally such young girls marry before 18 to start having children. A woman can wear her hijab but that should not stop her from being educated. Her education will have impact on her children. In Malaysia there are many professional Muslim women. I saw women with hijab  playing hockey and volleyball there. The human development indicators of Muslim population in Malaysia is higher than that of northern Nigeria. 

One cannot deal with the problem of education in northern Nigeria without tackling it in the family first where the child is shaped. And you cannot address that without addressing the status of the woman, difficult as it maybe culturally. For anyone who knows the details,  the Emir of Kano is not off the mark. Nigerian religious believers often lack the courage to confront  certain inconvenient realities. A 5country that claims to be very religious but the believers have repeated the same thing over and over with no desirable concrete positive change in the country is to me terribly embarrassing.  This same people will go to the countries they consider "pagans" and import the products of their creativity and innovations, shamelessly not asking why their own holy books have not inspired them to get their act together as the "pagans" did.

  The Emir is right. If the North or any part of Africa is refuses to see the writing on the wall, sooner or later they will realize they have  large population that is treated as though they are just surplus people and irrelevant to even the business in Abuja except during elections.

  Northerners who disagree with the Emir can have 100 children if they like. But there is no tax deductions and the fact that the children are brought into the world because of religious piety, culture or luster do not preclude asking the fundamental question of : how can they be raised and be productive citizens in the 21st century? This is the practical question and problem the Emir is trying to address. It is not an easy question but it is very relevant and legitimate.

Samuel



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------
Date: 2/25/2017 9:13 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: Cornelius Hamelberg <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>, USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Toyin Falola <toyin....@mail.utexas.edu>, Adeshina Afolayan <shina7...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Emir Sanusi on Polygamy, Procreation, and Poverty

‎I quite agree with CH, it is shocking the way Ogbeni Kadiri addressed the Emir. That is not acceptable. We should tackle issues not personality, especially a royal institution at that. He should not have concluded with the rather offensive statement. I believe it should be retracted.  
 The issue at stake here is, of what use is a proven virility if it can not be sustained economically? What business has Ochonu's class teacher-uncle, or the Okada rider to do with harems  and forests of children if he is economically incapable of taking good care of them? You know as much as I do that many of those children end up on our streets as urchins, Alimajeris, and easy recruits for terrorism!
‎I suppose the thrust of Professor Ochonu's contribution is the tragic extent to which the practice of uncontrolled procreation is culturally rooted and, therefore, may be a difficult task to tackle in light of Emir Sanusi's proposed sponsored  bill at the State Assembly. But the point is, we cannot throw up our hands in total surrender and expect a miracle (the Nigerian way). The Emir's approach might just work, through an enforcement backed by law. I call it "the chloroquine treatment": a child that is suffering from malaria may naturally dislike any form of medication, especially, the  bitter  chloroquine tablets, or the painful injection. A good parent would rather force the medication administered on the child rather than lose him to a preventable death through malaria. Similarly, if some folks do not know what is good for them, the onus rests on the leaders to do something drastic about it. That way, our society is saved from the social menace. 
I think what we should address our mind to is how best to address the apparent social menace, religious or cultural sentiment apart. The Emir has hinted on the possibility of a bill to enforce responsible parenting, people may still come up with more realistic solutions,‎ not abuse, not insults.

Ademola O. Dasylva‎

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Cornelius Hamelberg
Sent: Sunday, 26 February 2017 00:43
To: USA Africa Dialogue Series
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Emir Sanusi on Polygamy, Procreation, and Poverty

That is not the way to address the Emir Of Kano.

All he did was to make some serious suggestions as to how to help solve a problem that's surely looming over his country. You could disagree with him, but politely...

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Feb 26, 2017, 7:57:25 PM2/26/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series
Corrected:

Ogbeni Kadiri,

I have great respect for the person of the Emir of Kano and for his high office. I'm not being diplomatic, I'm just telling you the simple truth.

You are forewarned just in case, unawares you should like to take your lack of diplomacy too far : Freedom of speech has its limits at Speakers' Corner, Hyde Park . In that corner you may let off all the steam that you want but you are not permitted to abuse Her Majesty Queen Elisabeth II as we say in West African English, " in any shape or form" or in any kind of Language whatsoever.

I read your encomium about the Yoruba word "BÀBÁ. One of the things that I am most proud of about our Yoruba culture is the reverence for parents and great respect for elders. It's the mark of a great people and a great civilisation. Decadence (of which some of us are sometimes most guilty) and the subsequent fall of great civilisations is its reverse.

On reading your encomiums about the Yoruba word "BÀBÁ", the following came to mind - a must read : the entire section from the Shulchan Aruch on Honouring Father and Mother . Consider how much is wrapped in this one sentence excerpt from that code: "One must be extremely careful to fear and revere one's father and mother, for the Scriptures compare it to the honour and fear of the Holy One, blessed be He." (A seminal document : Honour and fear your parents - I know that time is precious that's why I entreat you to please read it.

("They tell you, 'Time is money' as if your life was worth its weight in gold." (Ogbeni Dylan)

Among the Sufis - the humble/ modest state of the faqih / faqir/faqr/ spiritual poverty - dependence on the Almighty , is a good state. Is this perhaps what Jesus meant by " Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven " - nothing to do with the guy who wanted his money to be buried with him so that he could - (say astaghfirullah) - so that he "could" try to "bribe" the Almighty?

The Holy Quran tells us that Allah is the rich and ye (mankind) are the poor

(Quran: 47:38

"The rich seduce the poor and the old are seduced by the young." ( Ogbeni Dylan)

Personally, I don't think that the Emir's proposed legislation will get through the Senate, any time soon. What are the lower limitations of poverty that should disqualify a poor man from marrying a second wife going to be? Is the state going to fix the legal minimum amount of the mahr/ dowry/ "bride-price" which is sometimes only a symbolic sum? Hasn't he said that he's against the centuries old tradition of "child marriage" ? More wrath from certain quarters. It's not going to get through any time soon, first of all because such legislation may not be popular and the senators - at least the Muslims among them know that they may have to face the wrath of their respective constituencies in their vast electorate, through the secret ballots...

On the other side of the Emir of Kano's proposal, corresponding women's rights will surely have a place. The education of the Muslim girl? So he could be more popular with Muslim women, less so with the Nigerian Taliban. But I'm thinking primarily of the women who are already married, two or three or four, to a poor man. Should a future law apply to them and their families, retroactively? And their children, what redress should they expect? I notice that the Emir mentions only boys in that little section in which he is quoted verbatim : "Those of us in the north have all seen the economic consequences of men who are not capable of maintaining one wife, marrying four. They end up producing 20 children, not educating them, leaving them on the streets, and they end up as thugs and terrorists."

And what about the children who are girls, what happens with them? They get married to rich men/ poor men who can't afford them?

(In India some Hindus have been converting to Islam. In India, Hindu parents have to pay a dowry to marry off their daughters, whereas in Islam it is the man who pays the mahr.

(Ogbeni Kadiri do you know that I still consider myself an expert on the marriage laws of Islam according to the five schools of Islamic jurisprudence? (In my research on Nigeria, to my distress I found out that relative to other ethnic groups who have embraced Islam in Nigeria, there is/ was a higher rate of divorce among the Hausa, a result of several factors)

I intend to phone you tomorrow before noon, to ask you about - according to you, the circumcision of eight days old males among the Yoruba...

Best Regards,

Ogbeni Hamelberg

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Feb 27, 2017, 6:46:58 PM2/27/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

Ademola, it is my belief that if a crusader is deficient in integrity, no normal person will believe his gospel. Traditional, religious and political leaders in Nigeria are not the conscience of the nation but the main cause of our people's problems. The capitalist economic politics (the type that operates in Nigeria) and the political culture that goes with it have as lubricants, several maladies such as extreme exploitation, corruption, nepotism, selfishness, state robbery, greediness, primitive accumulation of wealth, religious and ethnic bigotry. Those maladies caused by the traditional, religious and political leaders in Nigeria, give births to mass illiteracy, mass unemployment, mass poverty, armed robberies, kidnappings and assassinations. From the aforesaid, it is very clear that the economic problems of Nigeria today are not caused by overpopulation but embezzlement of developmental funds by the gangs of traditional, religious and political leaders. Let me clarify myself with example.


Official documents from the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) show that 19 states and 413 local governments in Northern Nigeria received together a total sum of N 8.3 trillion from the Federal government as allocation between 1999 and 2010. According to the 2006 census figures, Kano state with a population of 9.4 million received Revenue Allocations of N761.7 billion from the FG for the period of 11 years, which was N333.1 billion for Kano's 44 Local Governments and N 428.6 billion for Kano State government. What happened to those allocations and subsequent ones? Just like other states in Nigeria, Kano inhabitants have been robbed of their individual shares of Kano State's Gross Domestic Product by the ruling class that transformed their GDP share to Gross Domestic Poverty. That children in Kano State end up as street urchins, Alimajiris and easy recruits for terrorism are not as a result of being born to this world but as a result of heartless and wicked religious cum traditional and political leaders who had stolen funds allocated for their welfare developments. 


In year 2000, Nigeria was a signatory to the UN sponsored Millenium Development Goal (MDG), supported by IMF and World Bank, and in which Nigeria committed herself to establish free primary education for every child of school age in the country by the end of year 2015. Despite appropriated funds, nationally and internationally, ghost schools were built, ghost teachers were employed and ghost children were recruited while money disappeared into the personal bank accounts of traditional cum religious and political leaders. Those who steal money meant for education and welfare of Nigerian children now turn around to say that the children should not have been born to this world. Already, on 26 June 2012, President Goodluck Ebelechukwu Jonathan spoke at the inauguration of the Chairman and Commissioners of the National Population Commission, in Presidential Villa, Abuja. He said, "For us to plan properly, we must manage our population, but it is extremely sensitive, we are extremely religious people, either you are a Christian or a Moslem. Both Christans and Moslems and even traditionalists believe that children are God's gifts to man, so it is difficult for you to tell any Nigerian to limit the number of their children." He urged the NPC to come up with plans and programmes that will encourage Nigerians to have the number of children they can manage. He explained further, "Sometimes you get to somebody's house living in a well furnished duplex. The husband and wife there may have two, three or four children. The maiguard guiding them have nine children. That is the scenario you have. That means that there is a segment of the population that knows that you must get a number of children that you can manage but the other segment of the population don't. If you are used to military barracks you will see that the officers, General this, Major General this, Brigadier this, Colonel this have three, five children but those that have no rank have eight, twelve. This is the scenario. The people up, probably because of their level of education, know that they must control their population, but the people down, because of the level of exposure and education are still not aware that you must control your population. So first and foremost, before government comes up with regulations, guidelines or laws, Nigerians must be made to know that we cannot continue to procreate and procreate even though we know children are God's gifts." The President set a deadline of 2015 for the 23 man National Population Commission to complete the issuance of national Identity Cards to all eligible Nigerians. Although Jonathan observed the difference in rearing children between a duplex owner and his gate-keeper (MAIGUARD) as well as the difference at the rate of procreation between Commissioned Officers in the Army and other ranks, he failed to observe the economic apartheid that is responsible for the behaviour of the elements in his scenario. Education and just distribution of incomes are panaceas to birth control. The military officers and the duplex owner are either Christians, Muslims or traditionalists Nigerians, yet they did not regard numerous children as God's gifts that they are bound to procure. Thus, the desire for limitless procreation by individual has to do with lack of education and the  economic apartheid under which an individual is forced to live. In a country where absolute majority of citizens do not speak or understand the imposed official language, English, any birth control law will not be implementable. Even when the monarch talked about Islamic law, majority people of his Kano Emirate do not speak, write or understand Arabic. With that said, your idea of chloroquine treatment and the assumption that I abused or insulted the Emir stemmed from irrational analysis and illogical deductions.

S. Kadiri    



 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Ademola Dasylva <dasy...@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 26 februari 2017 04:13
Till: Cornelius Hamelberg; USA Africa Dialogue Series
Kopia: Toyin Falola; Adeshina Afolayan

Salimonu Kadiri

unread,
Mar 1, 2017, 4:42:47 AM3/1/17
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com

It was Oliver Cromwell who,  soaked his hand with the blood of Charles the 1st to demonstrate that the royal blood was not blue but red like all other human beings. I respect all human beings except hypocrites who occupy high offices and utilize their positions to exploit and oppress people. Justice brings peace and peace triggers progress.


Whatever is dirty and sacrilegious in our culture should be abandoned. No one is advocating that people should procreate indiscriminately since it was never like that in our culture, at least, up to the time Emir Mohammadu Sanusi was born. It was an era in which money must be earned through the sweat of one's brow and in realistic magnitude to one's production. In the Nigerian era of Emir Sanusi, life has become a lottery in which government officials consider themselves as lucky winners. Thus, officials are not satisfied with their huge incomes and allowances, they have to cart away funds meant for industrial development of the country that should bring succour to citizens. The Western system of government that Nigeria adopted has not only been bastardized by the generation of Emir Sanusi but even our culture. You quoted him thus, "Those of us in the north have all seen the economic consequences of men who are not capable of maintaining one wife, marrying four. They end up producing 20 children, not educating them, leaving them on the streets, and they end up as thugs and terrorists." In the good olden days, a man's capability of maintaining a wife was determined by a joint intermediary set up by the parents (families) of the bride and the bridegroom. Sexual intercourse before marriage was an abomination. Then, if a man who has 20 children wants to educate them according to the desire of Emir Sanusi, is there any school he can enrol his children? On the 26th of February 2017, the Nigerian Guardian online wrote that the purpose of mass wedding of 1,520 widows, divorcees and spinsters in Kano State by Governor Abdullahi Ganduje, was to combat rising rates of divorce, births out of wedlock and the number of impoverished widows and divorcees in the State. In Nigeria, where it is usual for employees of the federal, state and local governments to be owed six months or one year salary, what alternative has a man with a housewife than to divorce or abandon the wife and children? If the rate of births out of wedlock in Kano is very high and rampant, how then would Emir Sanusi's Islamic marriage law enforcement prevent births out of wedlock? 


Although, Benue State is geographically counted as part of the North, the marriage problem there is quite different from that of Kano State. The wife of the Governor, Mrs Eunice Ortom, recently appealed to the traditional ruler of TIV land to reduce bride price for TIV women due to the fact that many young girls cannot find husbands because of high bride prices in TIV land.

https://guardian.ng/news/reduce-bride-price-for-tiv-women-governors-wife-pleads/  Even if the bride price in Tiv land has been distorted and heavily commercialised, the effect of the bride price cultural practice indicates that he who cannot pay it, cannot maintain a wife and therefore, cannot marry. Traditionally, in Nigeria, a man is solely regarded as the breadwinner of the family, even where the woman has her own income which, in exceptional cases, can be higher than the husband's. Not everything that we do in Nigeria, traditionally and culturally, is bad and not everything done in Europe and America is good. Serial Monogamy as practised in Europe and the US, mostly, is nothing but  latent polygamy. In fact, there are  many children born out of wedlock, especially, among the upper class in Europe and the US.

S.Kadiri 



 




Skickat: den 27 februari 2017 01:06

Cornelius Hamelberg

unread,
Mar 2, 2017, 8:28:43 AM3/2/17
to USA Africa Dialogue Series

Crazy : Just a mini minor extravaganza, like Jeru Djama : Jungle music

Ogbeni Kadiri

To my mind, sometimes just like Gradgrind.

"THOMAS GRADGRIND, sir. A man of realities. A man of facts and calculations. A man who proceeds upon the principle that two and two are four, and nothing over, and who is not to be talked into allowing for anything over." (Chapter 2, of Hard Times entitled Murdering The Innocents )

Ogbeni Kadiri is very clear about this. Hmm. He is no respecter of persons/ human beings in whom flows red blood corpuscles that are equally red - as red as his - no respect for them if they are "hypocrites who occupy high offices and utilize their positions to exploit and oppress people".

He then continues that justice usually settles the score: "Justice brings peace and peace triggers progress."

Erstwhile, only familiar with the word hypocrite as used by Bob Marley in his " No women no cry",

"Cause, cause, cause, I remember when we used to sit
In the government yard in Trenchtown,
Oba - obaserving the 'ypocrites
As they would mingle with the good people we meet."

this chronic Googlecrat was moved to check out the exact meaning of hypocrite and I do believe that there is some kind of general consensus / areas of overlap between Buckingham Palace, post-colony United States and Nigerian English that we're talking about the same quality. In Sierra Leone Broken, the aitch is dropped and so you'll probably hear 'ipocrite or its equivalent " fari "(short) or Pharisee ( long) referring to the same thing. (In Sierra Leone Creole/ Krio, Pharisee means/ is synonymous with "hypocrite". How that twin meaning passed on/ got incorporated into the language can be traced back to the anti-Pharisee polemic in the so called "New Testament" in which the Pharisees received the brunt of Jesus' opprobrium. The Holy Bible was one of the main teaching texts for most of those who received a colonial education in what are still mostly Christian missionary schools in eighteenth, nineteenth, twentieth century Sierra Leone, onwards till this day. The Pharisees (the theological ancestors of today's orthodox rabbis) are exonerated and get a much fairer treatment at the hands of the Rev. R. Travers Herford in his book The Pharisees

Teleologically speaking are there any Pharisees in Islam, I wonder.

Re- "No one is advocating that people should procreate indiscriminately since it was never like that in our culture, at least, up to the time Emir Mohammadu Sanusi was born." ( S.Kadiri). This new way of measuring time "up to the time Emir Mohammadu Sanusi was born." and "after the time Emir Mohammadu Sanusi was born" reminds me of a line from the poem I read yesterday written by my friend Ashk's wife (Mana Aghaee) :

"If time ticked backwards--as it does Before Christ--"

Another time line - just as you say, in the good old olden days " Sexual intercourse before marriage was an abomination." Nowadays, there is no difference between before and after. It's all the same to them.

The import of Ogbeni Kadiri's position could be reduced to a universal question addressed to the living, just as the then irate Swedish Minister of Defence Anders Björk once inquisitioned a female member of a demonstration against him - I think it was about abortion - with this rhetorical assertion, "It's a pity that your father hadn't used a condom , then you wouldn't be here"

For those who advocate population control, it should be a sobering reminder that if our fathers had used a condom (just one, at the germane time - the time of germination or jam-i-nation , if you prefer that word (from jamming) ) then we wouldn't be here to be making a fuss about "population control", we wouldn't be here, no, not one. That's absolute control - " And for many moonlight kisses w love was ended before it began" (Nat King Cole - one of Akintola Wyse's favourite a stout Methodist - his other favourite was Jim Reeves' This world is not my home

Ogbeni Kadiri, about the hypocrites, Paul said, "There is none righteous, no not one" and that "All have sinned and fallen short of the glory". Paul of course composed his letters in Greek , but even in that language, when he said "all" . he meant " ALL" But we must forgive ourselves and forgive Paul when he says that " All your works are like filthy rags (menstrual bags) in the face of the Lord" - he was only quoting Yeshayahu/ Isaiah 64:6

Now where does that leave you and me?

I can't resist :

Hymen:

"Then is there mirth in heaven

When earthly things, made even,

Atone together." ( As You Like it)


A little reaction is better than none.

Cornelius

We Sweden

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages