Security Studies Backlash – A Feminist Response
We are writing to condemn the orchestrated assault against two anti-racist feminist scholars in our field by senior male scholars.
The senior scholars faced a critique of their work which appeared in a peer-reviewed journal publication and they were permitted the standard form of scholarly rejoinder. But finding that insufficient - and using now commonplace tactics deployed to silence women, persons of colour, queers, feminists, anti- racist scholars and other critical voices - they simultaneously worked to mobilize supporters, sent an email to hundreds of recipients, posted a ninety-eight page supplemental response, and engaged in a traditional and social media campaign against their critics as well as the journal and its editorial leadership.
This has galvanized a backlash, which is aimed at controlling who can speak and what can be spoken. Its effect is a politics of intimidation that silences the work of critical race and decolonial scholars. Early feminist and other critical work in IR faced similar reactions, though in an era that pre-dated the social media platforms that amplify these types of attacks today. The content of these attacks, however, is the same: they dismiss alternative voices and forms of critique for their lack of rigour or as poorly-executed scholarship, and in this way evade accountability or authentic engagement, except on terms dictated by those who have been critiqued.
This was a missed opportunity in which the insights of critical race theory could have been carefully engaged and forms of solidarity further developed. The public spectacle of these silencing techniques has not only harmed the immediate targets, it ensures a much wider audience is now being schooled in how to ‘responsibly’ engage with questions of race and racism.
We want to make absolutely clear that we are horrified by these tactics and by this assault. We view what is happening here as a form of violence, mobilized by scholars who ostensibly abhor violence but who are now responsible for the toxic and dangerous environment of harassment and intimidation their actions have produced.
This moment is a learning opportunity to engage respectfully in conversation with one another. No scholarship is innocent of the dynamics of structural racism and coloniality in which we are all embedded and thus all must work to be accountable for and to address this.
But there is no possibility of learning and moving forward when responses are reduced to silencing as a form of violence.
Cynthia Enloe
V. Spike Peterson
Jindy Pettman
Anne Sisson Runyan
Sandra Whitworth
Marysia Zalewski
Signatories as of 8 pm EST May 21 2020
Ali Bilgic
Amanda Álvares Ferreira
Amy Lind
Andrea García González
Anitta Kynsilehto
Anna M. Agathangelou Anna Powles
Annick Wibben
Anwar Mhajne (Mahajna)
Beth Greener
Biljana Ginova
Biljana Kotevska
Bina D’Costa
Caron Gentry
Catherine Eschle
Catherine Goetze
Catia C. Confortini
Colleen Bell
Cristina Masters
Daniel Conway
David Duriesmith
Denise Horn
Dženeta Karabegović
Elaine Mei
Lien Pratley
Elena B. Stavrevska
Elina Penttinen
Elisa Wynne-Hughes
Elisabeth Prügl
Erin Baines
Georgina Holmes
Hanna Ketola
Heidi Riley
J. Ann Tickner
J. Marshall Beier
Jane Parpart
Khushi Singh Rathore
Kiran Grewal
Laura Parisi
Laura Sjoberg
Linda Åhäll
Mandi Donahoe
Maria Martin de Almagro
Maria O'Reilly
Marianne H. Marchand
Marjaana Jauhola
Marsha Henry
Mary Hawkesworth
Mary Meyer
Maureen Fordham
Melissa T. Brown
Nadine Ansorg
Natalie F. Hudson
Nicola Pratt
Olajumoke Yacob-Haliso
Peace A. Medie
Peter Nyers
Punam Yadav
Rirhandu Mageza-Barthel
Rosalba Icaza Garza
Saara Särmä
Sam Cook
Sarai Aharoni
Shampa Biswas
Shine Choi
Shirin Saeidi
Shweta Singh
Simona Sharoni
Sladjana Lazic
Sungju Park-Kang
Susan T Jackson
Susanne Zwingel
Suzanne Bergeron
Swati Parashar
Synne Dyvik
Theresa de Langis
Thomas Gregory
Tiina Vaittinen
Toni Haastrup
Victoria Basham
Vjosa Musliu
Yeshi Choedon