You need human and material systems to naximize human potential, that ideally is the rationale for institutions.
Beyond Vanguard essays by Babalola, one of the strengths of a university is the creation of varieties of learning spaces.
Cambridge university and the city of Cambridge, for example,host conferences seminars, talks, almost daily round the year, bringing the foremost minds from around the world to Cambridge for any interested person to learn.
Such initiatives require serious money and vision.
I am not able to appreciate a relatively poor man, given the relationship of his wealth to his environment, such as Babalola, insisting on further enriching a person already rich in all particulars.
If the Americans refused to maximise contributions to their own universities which were primitive places when England and Germany had already reached great heights in academia, the US would not be the academic powerhouse it is today.
Beyond those discrete glories of Babalola's university,it takes many years of all round development to create and sustain a great university.
I am not able to see why that African development centre he is funding at the University of London could not have been housed in his own university.
What this means is that Kings College, London, and the University of London network will be immensely boosted by this infusion of cash, vision and patronage from the various stakeholders of this initiative.
London too will benefit from the money spent there by all those people.
The tradition of Africans needing to go outside Africa for maximal educational empowerment will be further sustained.
External exposure can be great but why must practically all the best learning opportunities, even about Africa, continue to be outside Africa?
Thanks
Toyin