dyno dan <lo...@is.important> writes:
>"California is a case in point, as revealed by data compiled on the
>website Statista.com.
>The Statista survey looked at data between 1982 and October 2023
>concerning episodes of a single attack with a firearm in a public
>place that resulted in four or more fatalities between 1982 and 2012
>or in three fatalities from 2013 onward (definitions that track a
>database compiled by MotherJones.com).
>Those figures show that California had by far the most such incidents
>during the survey period, at 26."
>
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20231106/california-style-gun-control-does-not-work-as-advertised
>How come the news media don't mention this?
Maybe because it's well known that regional gun laws are compromised
by there being no effective controls for the movement of guns from
regions that don't impose gun restrictions, and that any gun law in
the US is basically swiss cheese due to the manner in which the
supreme court has interpreted the second amendment?
--
There are the known knowns, things we know we know;
and the known unknowns, things we know we do not know;
but there are also the unknown unknowns,
those things we don't know we don't know.