It's a sure sign the invasion of Iran is imminent when, once again, the
ever-faithful servant "Osama bin Laden" is trotted out. Last time "he"
helped Bush get re-elected.
These tapes are so crude that the only wonder is that anyone will
believe they are genuine. You have to wonder if an ex-South Park man
produced the video of fall 2004. :-) The current audiotape is also of
poor quality.
Al-Jazeera, the equally-faithful shop-window for "Qaeda" tapes, a major
asset in "justifying" the imperial War Of Terror, was founded by
"defecting" BBC World Service staff in 1995-6, and has been since then
financed by the government of Qatar, since then effectively an
Anglo-American satellite.
http://us.geocities.com/libertystrikesback/centres.html#Qatar
we should not be surprised to learn one day that this "radical" station
has been covertly backed by the CIA.
The CIA. That now stands for Conspirators of Imperialist America. The
CIA, whose protege Qaeda was:
http://us.geocities.com/libertystrikesback/afghans.html
The patsies who were pre-selected, somewhere along the line, by US
intelligence. Cf.
http://us.geocities.com/libertystrikesback/afghans.html#abledanger
The "15 Saudi hijackers", most of whom got their entry visas at the
"CIA-dominated" US consulate in Jeddah:
http://us.geocities.com/libertystrikesback/sept-11.html#hijackers
The CIA's man John Fulton who, on the morning of 9/11, was conducting
an airplane-into-building "exercise" at the National Reconnaissance
Office. This is just four miles from Washington Dulles Airport, where
Flight 77 took off, and the "exercise" started WITHIN FIVE MINUTES OF
FLIGHT 77 DEVIATING FROM ITS COURSE TO RETURN AND HIT THE PENTAGON:
http://us.geocities.com/libertystrikesback/sept-11.html#Fulton
"The speaker praises Islamic fighters in Afghanistan but does not
mention the strike - on a Pakistani village.
"CIA experts in the US confirmed the voice was Zawahiri's but there is
no evidence it is a recent recording. ..."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4633580.stm
Zawahiri was never in the Pakistani village, but the CIA-organized
strike there helps pyschologically pave the way for the invasion of the
next oil target.
"Zawahiri's" videos are much better quality than "Osama's" tapes. They
can probably be faked to this quality. Why the difference? So that we
will think, "Well, those Osama tapes are obviously fake. But the
Zawahiri videos, wow, they MUST be real!"
An alternative is that (unlike Osama) Zawahiri is still alive, in a
secret CIA jail somewhere. ...
"The Central Intelligence Agency confirmed today that the voice on the
18-minute audiotape, posted on an Internet forum that has carried Al
Qaeda communiqués before, was Mr. Zawahiri's."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/20/international/middleeast/20cnd-tape.html
They're pulling out all the big guns to justify the seizure of their
next oil target.
Wot no pictures?! Now, the Zawahiri videotapes are for connoisseurs.
Much better quality than the "bin Laden" tapes. How are they done?
They can probably be faked to this quality.
The difference being accounted for by the desire to make people think,
"Well, those Osama tapes are obviously fake. But the Zawahiri tapes
are much better. Wow, they MUST be real!"
An alternative possibility is that Zawahiri (unlike bin Laden) is still
alive, held captive in a secret CIA prison somewhere.