HANS RUESCH IS DEAD
ishta...@ntlworld.com
> Good.
==========================================================
Hans Ruesch, founder of the modern scientific anti-vivisection
movement, died on Monday 27th August 2007, aged 94.
Though to some people purportedly fighting vivisection this will mean
little, his books having been shielded from them by the leaders of the
big 'anti-vivisection societies', it is very much a truth that a
beacon of light has gone out. The AV movement, largely unaware it may
be, has lost a great and courageous man, a rare genius who stood out
in an ocean of mediocrity that the AV 'movement' today represents.
Though Hans was an animal lover, and pleaded for abolition from a
moral stance, he also fully realised the futility of campaigning
against vivisection on moral grounds alone, and as a virtual one-man
band his CIVIS organisation claimed many successes in its battle
against vivisection.
There is currently little meaningful opposition to vivisection in the
United Kingdom: apathy, short-sightedness and an inability on the part
of most people within the movement to understand the issue of
vivisection has resulted in an anti-vivisection movement that is
unable, or unwilling, to respond effectively to the challenges that it
faces, and the lies as put forward by the pro-vivisection
establishment. It is also very true that vivisection will never end so
long as concerned people believe that the notion of animal rights can
end the organised and state-legalised fraud of animal experimentation.
This has been gone over thoroughly in the article, Time to Face Facts
Furthermore, that many people in the movement continue to offer
support, both financial and vocal, to those organisations and
individuals whose words, actions and policies clearly go against the
interests of an anti-vivisection movement that MUST change tact if it
is to get anywhere, whilst ignoring all evidence as to the rampant
infiltration such organisations have been subjected to, are obviously
major factors in having brought about the current dire state of the AV
movement.
This web site is for the benefit of those who wish to break free from
the web of deception as spun by the major 'anti-vivisection'
organisations out there, including their various phoney 'funds for
alternatives', whose only success has been to relieve gullible
campaigners of their money whilst helping to spread the lie that the
only way to end vivisection is through the development of
'alternatives'. This site will also, I hope, serve as a tribute to a
courageous man, whose dream of abolition was, sadly, not realised in
his life-time, although it is a fact that when abolition does come it
will be Ruesch's name that will take its rightful place in the history
books as having brought about this great leap in humanity's evolution.
As the essential first step, read Slaughter of the Innocent. Written
30 years ago, and still in print, it is as valid a call for abolition
as it ever was. Then read his follow-up, Naked Empress.
Read the two CIVIS Bulletins from 1983 and 1988 (complete on this
site). Though for many people new to the movement some - though not
all - of the names of people and organisations in them will be
unknown, whilst many will no longer be around, the facts within them
are a major document of the history of the AV movement over a 20 or so
year period. They should be read with the following in mind: "He who
forgets the past is doomed to repeat it", the point of which should be
clear to anyone capable of thought. It is my hope that soon a concise
and accurate history of the AV movement to date will be written, and
which will go a long way to opening the eyes of all those who wonder
just why vivisection has continued into the 21st century.
Follow these with the CIVIS Foundation Reports, starting with number
one and read through in sequence.
Read the CIVIS 'Black Booklet'; Vivisection is Scientific Fraud. 42
pages of b/w photos from vivisection labs the world over, and
originally part of the first edition of Naked Empress. Again, a lesson
from history, and perfectly valid as ever, despite the veneer of
respectability that the proponents of vivisection try to place over
the practice in order to hide the ghastly truth from the public. In
reality, despite the intervening years since this booklet came out,
little has changed for lab animals.
Finally there is the CIVIS Questions and Answers booklet, and a few
selected articles.
My advice for those new to the horrors of vivisection, and who
GENUINELY wish to do something about it, rather than dream, would be
to read the CIVIS literature and to treat it as a beacon of light to
guide you. Use it as the standard by which all future so-called AV
campaigners, organisations, books, and articles you come into contact
with are judged. Ideally, any campaigning groups, no matter how small,
would be based upon these works. Remember that a one man outfit can
achieve - indeed, did achieve - much more than the biggest so-called
'anti-vivisection' organisations, with their numerous staff and large
incomes, if run upon genuine lines.
To anyone seriously contemplating joining the fight against
vivisection I respectfully suggest that:
A) The notion of 'animal rights' is consigned to the history books; it
has reduced the level of anti-vivisectionism to the level of
playground squabbling, whilst creating a loathing on the part of most
people for the anti-vivisection movement.
B) Any discussion about 'alternatives' to vivisection, or the
'3Rs' (reduction, replacement, refinement) is not entered into for
reasons that should be obvious to those who have read the material on
this site.
==================================================
The above is reproduced from the BAVA website.
For a more realistic view of what this is all about, see:
http://groups.google.ie/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_thread/thread/ecfa0106e8c7bbe9?hl=en
ishta...@ntlworld.com
August?
I happened upon the news today, 14 November 2007, when looking for
something else on the BAVA website.
I screamed for Vicky and leaned against her breasts and wept
hysterically....
Hans Ruesch is dead.
I'm still weeping as I write this.
He's worth weeping for.
Why did you not tell me at the time, you shitebags......... ?
I'm not into funerals, but to express my respect for Hans Ruesch I
might have done something ........... if you had told me at the
time........
I suppose you're still feeling guilty about the suppression of the
Citizens Arrest Initiative.
http://www.nzavs.org.nz/mobilise/27/12.html
You are false.
You are false.
You are false.
It all ended in 1990.
But we need to evaluate our psychological impairment which caused us
to reject the Citizens Arrest Initiative.
It's not a case of feeling guilty about the suppression of the
Citizens Arrest Initiative.
It's just a case of acknowledging that we are very severely mentally
impaired.
http://www.article-planet.com/article314.html
Why didn't you tell me, when it happened.
Yes, a light has gone out.
He's gone now.
They've all gone.......... Wilhelm Reich, Immanuel Velikovsky, Hans
Ruesch, Paul Brunton.......
And the avalanche of "animal tested" (=untested) poisons is rotting
our brains, so no other men like them can emerge......... because our
brains are made of shit now..... meaning all these "animal
tested" (=untested) poisons are rotting our brains, hence the "dumbing
down" and all the other imbecility you see around you..........
"animal tested" (=untested) poisons are rotting our brains..... so
there will be no more great men like Wilhelm Reich, Immanuel
Velikovsky, Hans Ruesch, Paul Brunton.......... Our brains are made of
shit now, because our brains are filled with "animal
tested" (=untested) poisons....
As I said in 1987:
"WE ARE NOT GOING TO ABOLISH VIVISECTION.
VIVISECTION IS GOING TO ABOLISH US."
Hans Ruesch is dead.
What now for planet earth?
ishta...@ntlworld.com
Why can't you and Patrick and Sue and Bina and Bette and the others
FACE the FACT that it all ENDED in 1990.............?
It finished there and then in 1990.
Yes, the true history should be written, if the present shit
civilisation holds together............. but is BAVA happy about the
true history of the AV movement........... the crucial event being the
suppression of the Citizens Arrest Initiative in 1990.......
That event in 1990 was pivotal.
After you rejected the Citizens Arrest Initiative, the ruling group
knew they had a free hand to do whatever they wanted to do to us.
Next came the Treaty of Maastricht..... and the rest.......
They've got us.
You surrendered to them in 1990, when you remained silent on the
Citizens Arrest Initiative.
I'm willing to help you fuckers at BAVA, and your cohorts, to come
into the real world. But not in writing. Reply only by telephone.
Old Jinglebollocks
==========================
Hans Ruesch stepped outside the *fake debates* authorised by the
ruling group.
That's why you've never heard of him.
He's not part of the *fake debates* that the ruling group permits you
to engage in.
Hans Ruesch is dead.
What now for planet earth?
http://groups.google.ie/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_thread/thread/ecfa0106e8c7bbe9?hl=en
Janitor of Lunacy
all else, on topic.
Old Jinglebollocks
Hans Ruesch stepped outside the *fake debates* which the ruling group
permit you to engage in.
Hans Ruesch engaged in a debate which is declared non-existent by the
ruling group of the present tragic civilisation...... and their
slaves .... meaning YOU.
Hans Ruesch is dead.
What now for planet earth?
More *fake debates* ?
Or.............
http://groups.google.ie/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_thread/thread/ecfa0106e8c7bbe9?hl=en
Edric
"Janitor of Lunacy" <gh...@attic.info> wrote in message
news:CSL_i.263026$lV4....@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> How I miss him! His posts to uk.legal were always pointed, witty, and
> above all else, on topic.
Janitor of Lunacy
"Edric" <edric@> wrote in message news:1destm....@news.alt.net...
The Todal
"Janitor of Lunacy" <gh...@attic.info> wrote in message
news:CSL_i.263026$lV4....@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> above all else, on topic.
Never heard of him, never noticed any posts from him. Could you quote one?
Janitor of Lunacy
"The Todal" <deadm...@beeb.net> wrote in message
news:5q3pslF...@mid.individual.net...
You probably missed "How to spot irony" ;-))
The Todal
Oops.
Old Jinglebollocks
Meanwhile, Gill (Langley) was riding for a fall. Even as she was
propagandizing the need for vivisection and rejecting all allegations
that she was an infiltrator, the shining fortress of humaneness she
had built around herself came unstuck. A vegan, Mr Alfred Bunting of
Uxbridge, while investigating how come a Dr Christopher Langley had
ever managed to escalate into the directorship of the Vegan Society of
Great Britain, made a startling discovery, concerning not only this
Christopher Langley, but also his wife, Gill: both Chris and Gill were
trained vivisectors - and Christopher Langley was an employee of Ciba-
Geigy to boot! This Swiss multinational had conducted a covert,
intense smear propaganda against Hans Ruesch's works in Switzerland.
This gave at last a logical explanation to Gill Langley's persistent
defamation of Hans Ruesch in the anti-vivisectionist press.
Following is an abstract of a letter Mr A Bunting addressed to Mark
Souster of the Sunday Mirror on May 10, 1987, explaining the Langley
case:
"Thank you for your article today, publicising the fiendish cruelty of
Professor Colin Blakemore of Oxford University. But I am surprised to
see your mention that 'Dr Gill Langley' pontificated on "clinical
value", as though she were a physician. She isn't.
"'Dr Gill' had no medical training whatsoever. She is Mrs Gillian Rose
Langley, nee Dymond, of 46 King's Road, Hitchin. She got her PhD for
experimenting on cockroaches. After getting her PhD she worked for
about a year at Nottingham University, experimenting on rabbits.
Though no expert on "clinical value", she certainly knows about
cruelty in laboratories. As an apparently lucrative sideline Mrs
Langley is the boss and sole paid employee of the Dr Hadwen (begging)
Trust for Humane Research. Its leaflets ask for money to be sent to
her home, though she is not the treasurer.
"Although ostensibly opposed to vivisection, Mrs Langley's writings
put in plugs for the alleged benefits of vivisection. And she never
mentions her husband's estimated £35,000 per year Ciba-Geigy
bloodmoney. Ciba-Geigy is one of the largest multinational vivisection-
based pharmaceutical manufacturers. Its nerve centre is the CIBA
FOUNDATION FOR THE PROMOTION OF INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION IN MEDICAL
AND CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 41 Portland Place, London W1. Senior
Physiologist there is Mr Christopher Kenneth Langley PhD, 'Dr Gill's'
husband. Like his wife he has no medical qualification. Without
revealing his full true name or his Ciba job, 'Dr Chris Langley'
became director of the formerly humanitarian Vegan Society Ltd. In his
first 2 years as director the Society lost £ 75,959."
But don't stop reading yet, folks. The Langley story, like Caesar's
wife, gets more exciting as the night grows older.
When the information unearthed and disseminated by Mr Bunting started
causing considerable ripples in vegan circles, the Langleys resorted
to a trick they must have learned from the confidential vade mecum of
the Swiss multinationals, revealed by the "Group of Berne", a
respectable, watchdog Swiss organisation made up of concerned
businessmen: to discredit Mr Bunting and undermine his credibility,
they started disseminating faked letters that Mr Bunting was supposed
to have written, counterfeiting his signature. This was a trick the
multinationals employed in Switzerland against us, too, at the time of
the Franz-Weber-Initiative. Mr Bunting refused to be intimidated or
disconcerted, and saw to it that in October 1986 Christopher Langley
was served with a writ that said among other things:
"You falsely and maliciously wrote and published to various persons
including Society members defamatory matter concerning me including a
faked letter to 'Dear Glad' purporting to be written by me that you
pretended I had sent you; you falsely passed off the said faked
letters as being my writing."
But meanwhile his wife, Gill, had already broken down in a desperate
attempt to restore her damaged image in the eyes of the naive who had
not yet abandoned AA or cancelled any legacies to her private Hadwen
Trust in their wills. In an amazing circular, reeking with
sanctimoniousness and soggy from crocodile tears, entitled GILL
LANGLEY'S POSITION STATEMENT ON THE McCANN/RUESCH ACCUSATIONS, she
tried to justify her past as a vivisector with the following
confession:
"Tommy McCann accuses me of having been a vivisector. These are the
facts: At university as an undergraduate (1971-74) I took part in
physiology practical classes where decerebrate rabbits were used to
demonstrate known medical facts. I intensely disliked these classes...
These experiments were not legally defined as vivisection and did not
appear in the annual statistics. They are standard practice for
physiology students...I spent nearly 4 years doing a PhD (1971-74) in
which I studied the nervous system of cockroaches. I dissected many
hundreds in research which I gradually came to feel was morally
unjustified. In 1977 I became an anti-vivisectionist, persuaded by the
ethical arguments... In 1979 I could carry on no longer with work
which contradicted my principles..."
So it took this good lady, who already in 1971 "intensely disliked"
what she had been doing with decerebrate rabbits, all of 6 years of
uninterrupted laboratory activity to "become an antivivisectionist,"
and then it took her another two years of more of all that sadistic
idiocy to make her decide that she "could carry on no longer" with
that sort of work!
This document further confirms that surely a good number of cruel
experiments take place without anybody ever learning about them
because they are "not legally defined as vivisection," and thus
neither require a licence nor do they figure in the statistics - one
more "legal" trick designed to circumvent the law. There is no limit
to the inventiveness of vivisectors and their accomplices in the Home
Office.
Another interesting point in the circular is that Gill Langley once
more demonstrates that she toes the Syndicate's line by objecting to
vivisection solely on "ethical" grounds, as if those obscenities
involving animals had the slightest medical value, which she once more
seems to take for granted. And she tactfully refrains from ever
mentioning the CIBA-GEIGY connection of her devoted husband, Chris,
during all the years of anguish she allegedly underwent on witnessing
the suffering she had to inflict to her victims.
Anyway, Gill Langley will hardly last very long as the spiritual head
of AA. An infiltrator, once unmasked, becomes useless to the
Syndicate. Mark Gold, who figures as Editor of AA's organ, Outrage,
once wrote to a South-African correspondent: "If ever I should
discover that AA is infiltrated, I would resign." He discovered it a
year ago - unless he knew it all along - and his correspondents are
still waiting for his resignation.
However, the real wire-puller at AA is neither Langley nor Gold but
one John Bryant, who prefers to remain unobserved and figures only in
small print as one of the various Council members, after he managed to
get rid of all the honest animal welfarists like Jean Fawcett and her
husband, who were once in charge of AA's Ipswich branch.
To whom John Bryant has, in turn, to report, we have not been able to
find out. It is obviously someone much higher up than a modest
employee of a bungling animal welfare society.
THE LANGLEY MANAGEMENT
Now what is the Langley couple's real motive? Well-meaning, naive
animal welfarists assume it is just a matter of ordinary greed, a
successful fee-grabbing operation by unscrupulous pseudo-scientists
who found it convenient to palm themselves off as animal loving
veganists in order to escalate into the lucrative, easy directorship
of "humane" societies. Mr Bunting, an honest gentleman, held this view
as he investigated the odd couple.
However, long familiarity with the trickeries of the Che-Me-Vi
Kombinat, described in Naked Empress, suggested a far more sinister
motive, also because a man who is in the employ of Ciba-Geigy, like
Chris Langley, would hardly need to supplement his salary by creeping
into the directorship of some humane society. So what is the answer?
In Great Britain every active A V must also be a vegetarian, and even
a vegan, to retain his credibility in the movement. So whoever
controls the Vegan Society of Great Britain can also influence its
most dedicated A Vs, and try discouraging and paralyzing them with the
kind of misinformation that Gill Langley and Richard Ryder and Angela
Walder et al, keep spreading, like "all animal experiments can't be
renounced, but if you want to fight vivisection, just keep away from
cosmetics and give us money to find alternatives".
But the Langleys play a far more sinister role than to try influencing
the waning membership of AA, since both have succeeded in escalating
also into the management of the Nature Cure Clinic, Ltd, which was
founded in 1928 as "a non profit-making organisation under medical
supervision for the promotion of health by natural means." An example
shall typify the situation.
In the 1950s, a lady of our acquaintance had been completely cured of
a serious liver ailment within two months in the Nature Cure Clinic of
London, without any drugs, after her doctor had been unable to cure
her with drugs.
Some 30 years later, this lady's daughter was suffering from severe
stomach pains, but being pregnant she was afraid of taking the drugs
her doctor had prescribed. So on her mother's advice she called the
Nature Cure Clinic for an appointment. After stating her case what she
got from the other end of the line was not an appointment but a
scolding: she was told, by a doctor who didn't even visit her, that it
was very dangerous to attempt curing serious ailments with natural
remedies - and she should take the drugs her doctor had prescribed!
It seems clear that by now Big Brother has taken over also
establishments like the formerly prestigious Nature Cure Clinic, which
He directs from the shadows through stooges like the Langleys, who
must make sure that the morons' religious faith in the miraculous
power of the lucrative chemical poisons shall not die.
Dr JUDlTH E. HAMPSON, BSC, PHD, CBIOL, MIBIOL, chief animal
experimentation officer, RSPCA and EUROGROUP FOR ANIMAL WELFARE
This lady represents the main link between the RSPCA, Britain's oldest
among the phoney "animal welfare" societies, and its most recent
international outshoot, the Eurogroup for Animal Welfare, founded in
Brussels in 1979 by the British chemical interest, a few months after
Slaughter of the Innocent had been published in Great Britain.
Hampson's role as defender of vivisection in the international
organisation that pretends to protect the animals instead of the
chemical industry in the European Council at Strasbourg is described
in the CIVIS Bulletin Nr 1 (pp 35 & ff), published in November 1983.
Since then, the shameful Convention of the European Community that is
binding on the majority of Europe's industrialized countries and that
Hampson has helped impose in the name of animal welfare has finally
been accepted, in 1985. As a consequence, animal experimentation is
not only guaranteed to continue at an increased rate in number and
cruelty in the traditional venues, but is also assured to expand and
flourish in countries where animal experimentation is still in its
infancy, like Spain. Common Market rules, which new member-State Spain
is bound to comply with, as will future member-States, now impose
these bogus "safety-tests", to the great delight of the chemical
industry, of the medical organisations, and of the animal-breeders'
lobbies, whose activities we personally witnessed in the European
Parliament at Strasbourg.
Dr Judith Hampson, who led the "Team of Experts" of the Eurogroup, the
only official "animal welfare" organisation at the Strasbourg
Hearings, is personally responsible for letting the European
Parliaplentarians accept as genuine the false information issued by
the Research Defence Society, Britain's vivisection lobby, whose
members were palmed off at the Hearings as being honestly concerned
with the animals' instead of the industry's welfare. She wasn't only
an accomplice by omission, by silence, but by commission, because she
sustained to the Parliamentarians the theses of the industry. The
other members of the team sinned by omission: they kept silent. They
were: Ms Sheila Silcock (RSPCA consultant), Dr Henk Smid (Holland),
Madame Denise Pasternak (Switzerland), Dr Stafley (Holland) and Dr G A
MacGregor (UK).
For the first time in the history of anti-visectionism, a rule was
passed that allows the repeated use of the same animal in cruel
experimental surgery.
The second time was soon to come: when the Animals (Scientific
Procedures) Bill was enacted in British Parliament in 1986. The same
people as in Strasbourg pulled the strings there. Very few
parliamentarians realised what went on, or cared to know.
In The Guardian of April 9, 1985 Hampson wrote an article titled "When
animal rights confront human suffering", and signed it 'Dr Judith
Hampson, Chief Animal Experimentation Research Officer, RSPCA'. The
title of the article itself was tendentiously misleading. Judith
Hampson stated further:
"...Since our society has not yet come to accept holistic values,
animals are in our laboratories and seem likely to remain, Therefore
it will not help them merely to argue that their use is immoral, we
must also campaign vigorously for the alleviation of suffering."
There again talk of immorality, but no hint of the futility and
noxiousness to human health. Another gem was her statement that she
does not believe "that the use of animals in research can be
philosophically justified..." So we are back to philosophy, the great
diversionary playground. But the moment she dares speak scientifically
Dr Hampson doesn't hesitate to proclaim a big lie, knowing full well
it is a lie, and knowing equally well that it will remain undetected
by the overwhelming majority of the uninformed lay public. Says she:
"There will always remain a small core of experiments which do
represent a genuine ethical dilemma. I place in this category the
testing of human and animal vaccines, which, as yet, cannot all be
done without the use of animals."
Thus Hampson doesn't neglect to drag in the "religious" question of
vaccines in her article - the most likely to appeal to a thoroughly
brainwashed public. We can't discuss this vast subject in such limited
space, except to remind the reader that many manufacturers have
stopped vaccine production until the government guarantees to come up
for damages in case of further product liability lawsuits from damaged
consumers, or their survivors. Hampson's deliberate misinformation
resides in the fact that vaccines can be made, and are in fact being
made, without animals, using the much safer methods developed by
Hayflick, Nigrelli and Aygun decades ago.
That Hampson uses every possible lie to keep the consumption of
animals at a high level would seem to bear out the allegations of long
standing that she and her cronies hold substantial shares in the
animal breeders associations.
That would also help explain why she joined Gill Langley in defining
Slaughter of the Innocent and Naked Empress as totally "unreliable",
as the best way to keep readers away from them. On RSPCA stationery,
she wrote on July 24, 1985 to Mr Henry Turtle:
"Both books are littered with inaccuracies and totally unsubstantiated
statements, I do not have time to list them."
Our friends begged her to list them, but she didn't comply. But
meanwhile she made herself guilty of something far worse than a mere
"inaccuracy", in fact a deliberate scientific lie, by writing to the
same Mr Turtle on June 12, 1985:
Childhood leukaemia, previously incurable, is now cured in the
majority of cases by chemotherapy, developed by animal tests.
Here we have one more example of an official "animal welfarist" who
strives to validate the propaganda of the chemical, medico and animal
breeders combine that declare chemotherapy as actually life-saving
instead of death-dealing, as in fact it is. Her statement isn't simply
misleading but criminal in view of the well-known fact that leukaemia
has been dramatically increasing, especially among children, ever
since the various modern "therapies" have been inflicted upon a
frightened, artfully misinformed public.
Urethane has sometimes an inhibitory effect on human leukaemia, in
contrast to what animal experiments had shown.
Prof. Alexander Haddow wrote in the British Medical Journal, Dec. 2,
1950:
"The characteristic effects in leukaemia were detected solely as a
result of clinical observation. The various leukaemias in the mouse
and rat were relatively refractory to the influence of urethane, and
the remarkable effect in the human might have eluded discovery if
attention had been directed to the animal alone."
So while the properties of urethane might never have been discovered
because of animal experimentation, other much-touted therapies, such
as vaccinations and sulfa drugs, have been recognized as being
directly responsible for the production of leukaemia in humans. So Dr
B Duperrat, physician at the hospital St. Louis, France, wrote in
Presse Medica le as far back as March 12, 1955 (in reference to
smallpox vaccination): "The vaccination causes furthermore an
explosion of leukaemia."
The January 1958 issue of another French medical journal, Revue de
Pathologie Generale et de Physiologie Clinique, related: "The vaccine
modifies the terrain of the vaccinated, driving it towards alkaline
and oxydized terrain - the terrain of cancer. The fact can no longer
be denied."
Professors Julian Aleksandrowickz and Boguslav Halileokowski of the
Medical Academy of Cracow, Poland, had written (as reported by The
Lancet, May 6, 1967): "Already published reports as well as our own
observations indicate that smallpox vaccination sometimes produces
manifestations of leukaemia. In children and adults observed in the
clinics of Cracow, smallpox vaccination has been followed by violent
local and general reactions and by leukaemia."
Further, the July 1957 issue of Medical World, Dr Freda Lucas wrote:
"In England and Wales, total death rates from all forms of leukaemia
have increased more than six time between 1920 and 1952... According
to Wilkinson, sulphonamides (an antibiotic - HR) stand convicted as
one of the contributing factors, even when fairly low dosages were
employed. In cases reported in detail, the tragic path from
agranulocytosis to haemolitic anaemia and acute monolytic leukaemia is
revealed in black and white."
These cases represent just a small sample of the kind of reports by
authoritative medical experts listed in Slaughter of the Innocent. And
this explains why phoney "Animal Welfarists" take such pains trying to
discredit a book that is so embarrassing to their employers.
It is their assignment, in the disguise of concerned animal
welfarists, to persuade the ignorant majority that vivisection "cannot
be entirely dispensed with as yet", but certainly will be some day if
people contribute lavishly to the various fraudulent "funds for
alternatives" which they run partly in their and their colleagues'
own, private interests, and partly as a smokescreen designed to divert
from the central issue: the uselessness and noxiousness of animal
experimentation.
Links for this Bulletin Nr 2
Page 1 + Page 2 + Page 3 + Page 4 + Page 5 + Page 6 + Page 7 + Page 8
+ Page 9 + Page 10
Home----Intro----Articles----Books-----Help----Photos
Old Jinglebollocks
Meanwhile, Gill was riding for a fall. Even as she was propagandizing
the need for vivisection and rejecting all allegations that she was an
infiltrator, the shining fortress of humaneness she had built around
herself came unstuck. A vegan, Mr Alfred Bunting of Uxbridge, while
investigating how come a Dr Christopher Langley had ever managed to
escalate into the directorship of the Vegan Society of Great Britain,
made a startling discovery, concerning not only this Christopher
Langley, but also his wife, Gill: both Chris and Gill were trained
vivisectors - and Christopher Langley was an employee of Ciba-Geigy to
Old Jinglebollocks
1980s............
...........Gill Langley would have been sneaking out her back door at
3am wearing a false beard, never to be heard from again.
Tony Holland would have knocked the shite out of Gill Langley.
ishta...@ntlworld.com
========================================================
The Vivisection Swindle is one of the greatest of taboos. Nobody
wants
to touch it.
The *fake debate* on vivisection eclipses the truth.
And nobody wants to see that truth.
In early 1988, when Hans Ruesch's second "Bulletin" was circulated
(free of charge), the Langleys of this world were worried, even
afraid, afraid that the people would put two and two together and
come
around to the infiltrators' homes and lynch them. In this connection
I
advised Mrs Langley at the time to invest in a false beard.
In actual fact, by 1988, the surge of awareness and realism regarding
the Vivisection Swindle was already on the wane.
In 1990, the new scientific antivivisection movement effectively
signed its death warrant, and it's been downhill all the way since
then.
Even today, Gill Langley is still raking in donations and legacies
for
her fake, fraudulent "Dr Hadwen Trust," which says 'give me your
money
to try to find alternatives to vivisection,' when Mrs Langley knows
well that the only alternative to FAKE science such as the
Vivisection
Swindle is to simply stop using fake science now and revert to
genuine
science - so there never was anything to "find."
In fact a google advertisement for the organised crime scam called
the
"Dr Hadwen Trust" may even pop up alongside this post!
There is a need to say these things.
But Gill Langley will not be needing her false beard.
Nobody wants to tackle the Vivisection Swindle. The *fake debate*
will
continue. There is something about human beings which makes them
determined to commit collective suicide, determined to revert to a
state of survivalist emergency, recreating and reliving the forgotten
series of ancient survivalist emergencies in which human behaviour is
rooted.
The Vivisection Swindle, with its avalanche of "animal
tested" (=untested) poisons, is our major tool for arranging that
reversion to a state of survivalist emergency. And the *fake debate*
on vivisection to eclipse the truth is part of the package.
We are not going to do anything about it.
That was confirmed by the pivotal non-event of 1990.
Gill Langley will not be needing her false beard.
But there is a need at least for the truth to be displayed in a
public
place, for those who want to read it, a generation after that initial
but short-lived surge of awareness and realism of the 1980s.
Pages 9 to 11 of 'IMPERATRICE NUDA' (Slaughter of the Innocent) by
Hans Ruesch give the shortest route to proving Gill Langley is not
only a fraudster but a mass murderer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Begin extract from IMPERATRICE NUDA by Hans Ruesch, also
titled "Slaughter of the Innocent," pages 9 to 11, upon which
further comment would be superfluous:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The Great Drug Deception" by Dr Ralph Adam Fine (Stein and
Day, New York, 1972) is just one of the many books published in
the last decade on the subject of dangerous and often lethal
drugs, but it achieved no practical results. Health
authorities, as well as the public, stubbornly refused to take
cognizance of the fact that all those drugs had been okayed and
marketed after having been proved safe for animals. Actually it
is unfair to single out just a few dangerous drugs, since there
are thousands of them.
Of course the fallacy works both ways, precluding the
acceptance of useful drugs. There is the great example of
penicillin - if we want to consider this a useful drug. Its
discoverers said they were fortunate. No guinea pigs were
available for the toxicity tests, so they used mice instead.
Penicillin kills guinea pigs. But the same guinea pigs can
safely eat strychnine, one of the deadliest poisons for humans
- but not for monkeys.
Certain wild berries are deadly for human beings, but birds
thrive on them. A dose of belladona that would kill a man is
harmless for rabbits and goats. Calomelan doesn't influence the
secretion of bile in dogs, but can treble it in man.
The use of digitalis - the main remedy for cardiac patients and
the saviour of countless lives the world over - was retarded
for a long time because it was first tested on dogs, in which
it dangerously raises blood pressure. And chloroform is so
toxic to dogs that for many years this valuable anesthetic was
not employed on patients. On the other hand a dose of opium
that would kill a man is harmless to dogs and chickens.
Datura and henbane are poison for man, but food for the snail.
The mushroom *amanita phalloides*, a small dose of which can
wipe out a whole human family, is consumed without ill effects
by the rabbit, one of the most common laboratory animals. A
porcupine can eat in one lump without discomfort as much opium
as a human addict smokes in two weeks, and wash it down with
enough prussic acid to poison a regiment of soldiers.
The sheep can swallow enormous quantities of arsenic, once the
murderers' favourite poison.
Potassium cyanide, deadly for us, is harmless for the owl, but
one of our common field pumpkins can put a horse into a serious
state of agitation. Morphine, which calms and anesthetizes man,
causes maniacal excitement in cats and mice, but dogs can stand
doses up to 20 times higher than man. On the other hand, our
sweet almonds can kill foxes and chickens, and our common
parsley is poison to parrots.
There are enough such instances to fill a book - all proving
that it would be difficult to find a more absurd and less
scientific method of medical research (than animal
experimentation).
Moreover, the anguish and sufferings of the animals, deprived
of their natural habitat or habitual surroundings, terrorized
by what they see in the laboratories and the brutalities they
are subjected to, alter their mental balance and organic
reactions to such an extent that ANY result is a priori
valueless.
The laboratory animal is a monster, made so by the
experimenters.
Physically and mentally it has very little in common with a
normal animal, and much less with man.
As even Claude Bernard (1813-1878), founder of the modern
vivisectionist method, wrote in his Physiologie Operatoire
(page 152): "The experimental animal is never in a normal
state. The normal state is merely a supposition, an
assumption."
......................
......................
Somebody launched the idea of breeding strains of
bacteriologically sterile laboratory animals...................
One delusion spawned another. Consistent failure made certain
of those misguided scientists realize - some haven't realized
it yet - that organic "material" raised under such abnormal
conditions differs more than ever from normal organisms.
Animals so raised never develop the natural defence mechanism,
the so-called immunological reaction, which is a salient
characteristic of every living organism. So it would be
difficult to devise a less reliable experimental material.
Besides, animals are by nature immune to most human infections
- diphtheria, thyphus, scarlet fever, German measles, smallpox,
cholera, yellow fever, leprosy and bubonic plague - while other
infections, such as TB and various septicemias, take up
different forms in animals. So the claim that through animals
we can learn to control human diseases could seem a sign of
madness if we didn't know that it is just a pretext for
carrying on "experiments" which, however dangerously misleading
for medical science, are either intimately satisfying for those
who execute them, or highly lucrative.
The Swiss nation illustrates well to what extent the profit
motive promotes vivisection: with a population of less than 6
million, Switzerland uses up annually many times as many
laboratory animals as does all of Soviet Russia with its 250
million inhabitants, but where there is no money in the making
of medicines.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-End of extract from IMPERATRICE NUDA / "Slaughter of the
Innocent" by Hans Ruesch, pages 9-11.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I said further comment on Hans Ruesch's words would be
superfluous.
Nevertheless I just want to reiterate what I've stated earlier:
.........that to toss a coin would be a MUCH more reliable method of
testing a new substance for its safety for human beings than to
shove it down an animal's throat.
If we toss a coin, we'll get it right fifty per cent of the
time.
Heads it's safe, tails it's unsafe.
By contrast, if we grant our permission to our ****head
imbecile scientists to carry out animal tests, the errors
multiply in geometric progression until we don't know whether
we are coming or going. The result is the avalanche of "animal
tested" poisons flooding into the environment at an
accelerating rate which will soon strangle the earth's life
support system
Just read your newspaper (with your eyes open this time) to see
what vivisection is doing to you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
http://groups.google.ie/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_threa...
Old Jinglebollocks
> See also:http://groups.google.ie/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_threa...
===========================================================================
The Vivisection Swindle illustrates the falseness of our
civilisation.
The truth about the Vivisection Swindle is one of ten Forbidden
Subjects.
This fake civilisation rests on the foundation of denying and ignoring
those ten Forbidden Subjects.
If we confronted those ten Forbidden Subjects and acted accordingly,
the present fake civilisation would cease to exist and we would return
to the Garden of Eden, meaning our ancient state of purity, decency
and sanity of eleven thousand years ago.
The lost memories of infancy constitute another of the Forbidden
Subjects.
It is surely an amazing state of affairs when we don't remember our
infancy and therefore have no knowledge of what actually happens to
human infants, in terms of the infants' authentic perceptions and
experiences and needs.
How can you be a mother if you don't remember your own infancy? You
can't. You're just shitting into the wind if you try to be a mother
without remembering your own infancy.
What is education? Given that infancy is the major formative influence
in our lives, given that the authentic perceptions and experiences of
infants make us what we are, how can our "educational" system place no
emphasis on enabling everybody to recover the memories of infancy?
Now do you understand why we're all talking shite around here?
Old Jinglebollocks
civilisation.
The truth about the Vivisection Swindle is one of ten Forbidden
Subjects.
This fake civilisation rests on the foundation of denying and ignoring
those ten Forbidden Subjects.
If we confronted those ten Forbidden Subjects and acted accordingly,
the present fake civilisation would cease to exist and we would return
to the Garden of Eden, meaning our ancient state of purity, decency
and sanity of eleven thousand years ago.
The lost memories of infancy constitute another of the Forbidden
Subjects.
It is surely an amazing state of affairs when we don't remember our
infancy and therefore have no knowledge of what actually happens to
human infants, in terms of the infants' authentic perceptions and
experiences and needs.
How can you be a mother if you don't remember your own infancy? You
can't. You're just shitting into the wind if you try to be a mother
without remembering your own infancy.
What is education? Given that infancy is the major formative influence
in our lives, given that the authentic perceptions and experiences of
infants make us what we are, how can our "educational" system place no
emphasis on enabling everybody to recover the memories of infancy?
Now do you understand why we're all talking shite around here?
-Pete
"I Still Miss Someone"
http://www.network54.com/Forum/57466/thread/1193285565/last-1193285565/I+Still+Miss+Someone
Old Jinglebollocks
*Fake Debate* on vivisection, which conceals the truth about the
Vivisection Swindle.
The Vivisection Swindle is one of TEN FORBIDDEN SUBJECTS which the
people of the present tragic civilisation are carefully avoiding.
Refusing to confront those ten Forbidden Subjects is what makes the
present tragic civilisation possible. It is a civilisation based on a
game of pretending, a lie - maily the lie of avoiding the Forbidden
Subjects.
Not many people will welcome what follows here. Still, for the record,
there is an impulse that grips some of us at a time like this, an
impulse to speak the forbidden truth for the few who will want to hear
it.
What I can do now is take the original post and point out step by step
how it is a FAKE DEBATE intended to conceal the truth about the
Vivisection Swindle.
Whether "Tony Gal" knows what he is doing or is a dupe of the
infiltrators, I don't know and it doesn't matter any more.
=============================================================
TONY-GAL View profile
More options Nov 11 2007, 2:27 pm
Newsgroups: uk.legal
From: TONY-GAL <from_...@hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 06:27:09 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 11 2007 2:27 pm
Subject: Improve Standards of Animal Welfare in European Laboratories
TO: All People Who Care
"The European Commission is currently reviewing Directive 86/609/EEC,
which sets out the rules for animal experimentation across the whole
of Europe. There is still time to make a difference to the final
draft."
====================================
REPLY:
The only sane "rule" about animal experimentation would be TOTAL
ABOLITION NOW to save human lives by stopping the avalanche of "animal
tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons which is about to destroy the earth's life
support system and bring about the collapse of our civilisation.
By joining in and promoting the FAKE DEBATE, Tony Gal confers
legitimacy on vivisection when it has no legitimacy, scientifically or
otherwise.
====================================
Tony Gal wrote:
"A new European Chemical Testing Policy called REACH proposes to Test
30,000 Chemicals of every kind - from those used in industrial
processes to the ingredients of consumer products - on Millions of
animals from mice to fish to dogs, causing untold suffering. This
Directive should help these animals while still improving standards."
=====================================
REPLY:
The FAKE DEBATE speaks of animal welfare, ignoring the truth that
"animal tests" are the same as no test at all, and so our earth is
about to be destroyed by the avalanche of UNTESTED poisons that have
been pouring out of the vivisection laboratories for the past half
century and are rotting our brains and driving us progressively more
insane, as you can see if you read your newspaper. Tony Gal's FAKE
DEBATE is designed to enable us to avoid thinking about that
uncomfortable truth by pretending the debate is only about "bigger
cages" for animals.
=====================================
Tony Gal wrote:
"The European Commission itself acknowledges that non-animal
replacements "...have the potential to provide robust information
through quality-controlled, state-of-the-art tests which are faster
and less cost-intensive than classical animal-based tests".
It has launched a Community Action Plan for the Protection and
Welfare
of Animals. This explicitly states "The final aim is to replace
animal
experiments with methods not entailing the use of an animal."
It is in all our interest that Animal Testing is replaced with
Alternatives based on Human Biology not Animals.
For evidence that superior Alternative Research & Testing is
replacing
Animal Testing visit
http://www.drhadwentrust.org/ "
================================================
REPLY:
Again, this is a FAKE DEBATE. We have no need to look for
"alternatives" to "animal tests" because "animal tests" are the same
as NO TEST, so that a vast avalanche of UNTESTED poisons has been
flooding into the environment for the past half century and is about
to destroy our civilisation completely by causing the breakdown of the
earth's life support system. Providing a link to Gill Langley's fake,
fraudulent "Dr Hadwen Trust" is the ultimate betrayal of your readers,
Tony.
================================================
Tony Gal wrote:
"Please sign "Replace all Animal Experiments in Europe"
http://www.endeuanimaltests.org/
Now political pressure is needed to encourage EU legislators to do
everything they can to maximise non-animal replacement efforts.
Contact your MEPs and urge them to use the revision process of
Directive 86/609/EEC as an opportunity to improve the Standards of
Animal Welfare in European Laboratories and make replacing with
Alternatives a priority.
For contact details of your MEPs visit
http://www.europarl.europa.eu
If you want to do more:-
Over 10,000 primates are used in experiments in Europe every year
with
the UK being Europe's largest single user followed by France and
Germany.
Please write to the European Commission and ask them to ban primate
tests. To help, a prepared letter can be found at
http://www.eceae.org/saveprimates/en/action.html
Please tell your friends and colleagues to do the same.
More information on Animal Testing from
http://www.peta.org/
http://www.buav.org
For information on Revision of Directive 86/609/EEC
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/revision_en.htm
Everyone can help and you can make a difference.
Thank You
Tony, Nottingham, England"
=====================================================
REPLY:
It goes on. Tony Gal's fake debate is based on the false belief that
animal experimentation is valid and useful, when the reality is that
animal experimentation is the greatest catastrophe to befall the human
race in the past 2,700 years. The Vivisection Swindle has caused many
more human deaths and injuries than World War Two. Tony Gal's fake
debate conceals that basic fact of our lives and sends you down a
blind alley where you will "TRAVEL HOPEFULLY BUT NEVER ARRIVE" for all
eternity. That is what all these FAKE DEBATES are for. BUAV and PETA
are mentioned by Tony G. Again these are FAKE organisations which
promote the FAKE DEBATE on the Vivisection Swindle, designed to
conceal the fact that vivisection is unleashing on us an avalanche of
UNTESTED poisons which is rotting our brains and 'dumbing us down,'
making us increasingly irrational and violent (read your newspaper)
and which will soon destroy the earth's life support system and return
the human species to the state of survivalist emergency.
That's scary. Hence the FAKE DEBATE is very much in demand.
For the truth about the Vivisection Swindle, see:
http://groups.google.com/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_thread/thread/ecfa0106e8c7bbe9?hl=en
Old Jinglebollocks
> More options Nov 11 2007, 2:27 pm
>
> which sets out the rules for animal experimentation across the whole
> of Europe. There is still time to make a difference to the final
> draft."
>
> ====================================
It is very difficult for sane beings to have any patience with
shithead imbeciles like "Tony Gal."
Do parents not have any natural impulse to protect their babies from
being poisoned and murdered by the Vivisection Syndicate?
We were told at school that the parenting impulse, the impulse to
protect our young, to give new life a chance, to give our babies a
good start in life.... that that is the most powerful emotional drive
in the human psyche.
It's a lie.
WHY have we not arrested all known vivisectors and marched them to the
nearest police station and demanded that all vivisectors be put on
trial .............. for mass murder of human beings on a much larger
scale than World War Two?
MURDER is MURDER.
To resurrect my slogan from the 1980s:
ANIMAL RESEARCH KILLS PEOPLE !
If the vivisectionists promote a system of pretending they are "safety
testing" the millions of new substances that have been flowing into
the environment for the past half century, when in fact THESE
SUBSTANCES HAVE NOT BEEN TESTED AT ALL, because "animal tests" are the
same as NO TEST.............. well then the vivisectors are obviously
guilty of mass murder of human beings......... ON A NUMERICAL SCALE
MUCH GREATER THAN THE ESTIMATED FIFTY MILLION HUMAN BEINGS KILLED BY
WORLD WAR TWO.
If you don't care about your own life or your own health, you MUST
care about your baby's life and health.
So WHY have you not carried out CITIZENS ARRESTS of all known
vivisectors and demanded that all known vivisectors be put on trial
for mass murder of human beings?
The same applies to infiltrators like Gill Langley who have sabotaged
the efforts of people like me who tried so hard to alert you to the
threat to your baby's health and life from the Vivisection Swindle.
[ PS - If I continue to shout loudly about the Vivisection Swindle,
watch out to see Vernon Coleman crawling out from the woodwork yet
again ! ]
"The Citizens' Arrest Initiative"
http://www.nzavs.org.nz/mobilise/27/12.html
"IMPERATRICE NUDA REVISITED"
http://groups.google.ie/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_thread/thread/ecfa0106e8c7bbe9?hl=en
==============================================================================================
Old Jinglebollocks
and their fault is the desire to rule everywhere. Nothing can effect this,
not even might, which is of no use in the kingdom of the wise, and is only
mistress of external actions.
Tyranny--... So these expressions are false and tyrannical: "I am fair,
therefore I must be feared. I am strong, therefore I must be loved. I am...
Tyranny is the wish to have in one way what can only be had in another. We
render different duties to different merits; the duty of love to the
pleasant; the duty of fear to the strong; duty of belief to the learned.
We must render these duties; it is unjust to refuse them, and unjust to ask
others. And so it is false and tyrannical to say, "He is not strong,
therefore I will not esteem him; he is not able, therefore I will not fear
him."
333. Have you never seen people who, in order to complain of the little fuss
you make about them, parade before you the example of great men who esteem
them? In answer I reply to them, "Show me the merit whereby you have charmed
these persons, and I also will esteem you."
334. The reason of effects.--Lust and force are the source of all our
actions; lust causes voluntary actions, force involuntary ones.
335. The reason
Old Jinglebollocks
though the cause is unknown; an event such as one has never seen before
passes for a prodigy."
[18]Allusion to Gen. 7. 14. Ipsi et omne animal secundus genus suum. "And
every beast after his kind."
19Homer, Odyssey, xviii.
20Livy, xxxiv. 17. "A brutal people, for whom, when they have not armour,
there is not life."
21Ecclus. 24:11. "With all these I have sought rest."
22"Terror which is more powerful than religion."
[23]"From fear that they are being led by terror, without guidance,
domination appears tyrannical."
[24]"What will become of men who mistake small things and do not believe in
greater?"
25Is. 45:15. "Thou art a God that hidest thyself."
[26]Wisd. of Sol. 4:12. "Bewitching of naughtiness."
[27]Wisd. of Sol. 5:15. "The remembrance of a guest that tarrieth but a
day."
281 Cor. 1:21.
29"They have seen the thing; they have not seen the cause." St. Augustine,
Contra Pelagium, iv.
30Matt. 11:27 "Neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to
whomsoever the Son will reveal him."
31Is. 45:15. "Verily, thou
Old Jinglebollocks
that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am He.
"I have declared, and have saved, and I alone have done wonders before your
eyes: ye are my witnesses, said the Lord, that I am God.
"For your sake I have brought down the forces of the Babylonians. I am the
Lord, your Holy One and Creator.
"I have made a way in the sea, and a path in the mighty waters. I am He that
drowned and destroyed for ever the mighty enemies that have resisted you.
"Remember ye not the former things, neither consider the things of old.
"Behold, I will do a new thing; now it shall spring forth; shall ye not know
it? I will even make a way in the wilderness, and rivers in the desert.
"This people have I formed for myself; I have established them to shew forth
my praise, etc.
"I, even I, am He that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake,
and will not remember thy sins. Put in remembrance your ingratitude: see
thou, if thou mayest be justified. Thy first father hath sinned, and thy
teachers have transgressed against me."
Is. 44.: "I am the first, and I am the last, saith the Lord. Let him who
will equal himself to me, declare the order of things since I appointed the
ancie
ishta...@ntlworld.com
==============================================================
This is reminiscent of the fake letters circulated by the Langley gang
in 1986. I haven't read all of what is written above, just as I never
read various fake letters that were circulated by the Langley gang in
the 1980s. None of it matters. The Kathryn Reynolds Show in 1986
showed us the way the wind was blowing. The final surrender of 1990
sealed our fate. There is an irresistible compulsion to repeat the
past, to return the earth to a state of survivalist emergency, which
is guaranteed by the avalanche of "animal tested" (=untested) poisons
which will soon destroy the earth's life support system completely.
-Pete
"I Still Miss Someone"
http://www.network54.com/Forum/57466/thread/1193285565/last-1193285565/I+Still+Miss+Someone
==============================================================
ishta...@ntlworld.com
Meanwhile, Gill (Langley) was riding for a fall. Even as she was
Hal Ó Mearadhaigh.
> CIVIS Bulletin Nr 2, New Year 1988 (Part Three)
>
> Meanwhile, Gill (Langley) was riding for a fall. Even as she was
> propagandizing the need for vivisection and rejecting all allegations
> that she was an infiltrator, the shining fortress of humaneness she
> had built around herself came unstuck. A vegan, Mr Alfred Bunting of
> Uxbridge, while investigating how come a Dr Christopher Langley had
> ever managed to escalate into the directorship of the Vegan Society
> of
This is all far, FAR, too long! "Nobody" would be bothered reading such an
amount in a NG post. You come across as a complete crank!
--
Harry Merrick.
eugene
"Hal Ó Mearadhaigh." <home...@hotmail.com> wrote in message You come across
as a complete crank!
>
> --
> Harry Merrick.
hahahahahahahahahahah
talk about calling the kettle black!!
hahahahahahahahahahahahahah
>
Who was the silly hypocrite who, when getting a little attention from a lady
here a few months ago, posted numerous unsnipped posts here so that he could
re-read them constantly in his desperate need to inflate his massive ego.
get a life Merrick you ballbag.
Hal Ó Mearadhaigh.
You condemn yourself with your own words, resorting yet again to the
vernacular of the inarticulate, which your post plainly demonstrates! Away
to your picture taking, ignorant wee man!! ROTFL!!
--
Hal Ó Mearadhaigh.
Old Jinglebollocks
MENTAL ILLNESS revisited
========================
We need to straighten out our perceptions on what constitutes mental
illness.
The entire human population, meaning everyone in the world, is
mentally ill.
Whoever you are, you are very severely mentally ill.
We'll never make any tangible, sustainable progress until we recognise
that fact.
Look at us.
+++FEAR OF KNOWING OURSELVES+++
We don't even know who we are. We are terrified of knowing our
history. We have a fake "science" called "geology," which exists to
CONCEAL the ACTUAL geological record, which - if examined - would give
us insight into the series of catastrophes which caused the series of
survivalist emergencies in which all human behaviour is rooted. That
series of catastrophes drove the entire human race insane.
In addition to having a terror of recovering the memory of the
historical "infancy" of our tribe, we also have a terror of recovering
the memory of the infancy of the individual person.
"The game we play is let's pretend, and pretend we're not
pretending......"
In other words, WE ARE TERRIFIED OF KNOWING THE TRUTH ABOUT
OURSELVES.
That is mental illness. All human beings are very severely mentally
ill.
+++PAIN-GENERATING SOCIETAL ARRANGEMENTS+++
Then consider the fact that our societal arrangements were devised
with the intention of RATIONING LOVE. Our societal arrangements
prohibit love from flowing between human beings as much as possible.
OUR SOCIETAL ARRANGEMENTS AUTOMATICALLY GENERATE PAIN, MISERY, VIOLENT
CRIME, WAR, CHILD ABUSE.
Next, consider the fact that I have failed to find even ONE other
human being to support me overtly in calling for a movement toward
eventual ABOLITION of our pain-generating societal arrangements.
That is additional proof that every human being, without exception, is
very severely mentally ill.
+++ABSENCE OF PARENTING IMPULSE+++
Still with reference to the fact that our societal arrangements
automatically generate pain - our determination to perpetuate our pain-
generating societal arrangements means that we human beings have no
parenting impulse, we have no impulse to protect our children from
pain. ALL human beings, without any exception anywhere, are quite
determined to subject their children and grandchildren to the same
misery-making societal arrangements that we ourselves have had to
endure. So human beings have no compassion for their own babies, being
determined to preserve for all time these pain-generating societal
arrangements, so as to make sure our babies' lives will be filled with
pain!
To have such a fierce determination to inflict pain on your own babies
by refusing to abolish our pain-generating societal arrangements -
THAT IS MENTAL ILLNESS, AND THAT IS CONCLUSIVE PROOF THAT ALL HUMAN
BEINGS WITHOUT EXCEPTION ARE VERY SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL.
---------------------------------------------------------------
+++COLLECTIVE SUICIDE - THE VIVISECTION SWINDLE+++
Any discussion on mental illness should give prominence and emphasis
to the Vivisection Swindle.
Although what has been said so far proves the point, the Vivisection
Swindle will convince the most diehard sceptic that every human being
in the world, without any exception anywhere, is very severely
mentally ill.
Even if you have only half a brain, and with your head only half
screwed on, still a reading of pages 9 to 11 of 'IMPERATRICE NUDA' by
Hans Ruesch will demonstrate to you that all the millions of new
chemicals flooding into the environment in the past half century to
fuel our ever-expanding 'hi tech' civilisation WERE NEVER TESTED FOR
SAFETY.
For half a century, a vast avalanche of millions of new substances has
been pouring into our water, our air, our soil, our food, our blood,
our tissues, our bones and our brains, WITHOUT EVER BEING TESTED FOR
SAFETY.
Animal tests are the same as NO TEST AT ALL, as you can prove in five
minutes by reading pages 9 to 11 of 'IMPERATRICE NUDA' and verifying
what it says.
This avalanche of "animal tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons is slowly but
surely destroying our health and driving us all progressively more
insane with each passing year, as you can see from the steady increase
in degenerative diseases (cancer, arthritis, etc.), violent crime,
suicides, plus the general 'dumbing down' in the educational system,
and the observable and verifiable fact that people today are
noticeably much more stupid and more cowardly than they were twenty
years ago. Not only that, but the avalanche of "animal
tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons is now close to completely destroying the
earth's life support system and plunging the human race back into a
state of survivalist emergency.
All of this is obvious, and gallant efforts have been made to
publicise it. Yet almost nobody sees it. Instead we have a FAKE DEBATE
on the Vivisection Swindle, to spare our blushes by concealing the
truth and reducing the debate to a demand for bigger cages for animals
and similar. This FAKE DEBATE precludes the possibility of entering
into the real debate, the debate that would be demanded by sanity, if
sanity existed anywhere in this world - the debate on saving ourselves
from collective suicide via the avalanche of "animal
tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons.
This collective death wish on the part of all human beings is enough
to demonstrate that all human beings without exception are mentally
ill.
And to that we can add the complete absence of any parenting impulse
in human beings.
Our children and our grandchildren will have to deal with a collapsed,
barren world, destroyed by the avalanche of "animal
tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons.
And yet there is NO human being, anywhere in the world, who is opposed
to the Vivisection Swindle.
That was proved by the suppression of the Citizens' Arrest Initiative
in 1990, as well as by the ongoing success of the FAKE DEBATE.
There is nobody, anywhere on earth, who is opposed to vivisection.
There is nobody, anywhere on earth, who is opposed to destroying the
earth's life support system via the avalanche of "animal
tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons pouring out of the vivisection
laboratories.
And that means there is NOBODY, anywhere in the world, who has a
parenting impulse, an impulse to protect our children and our
grandchildren from the avalanche of "animal tested" (=UNTESTED)
poisons which will soon destroy the earth's life support system and
plunge the human race back into a state of survivalist emergency.
So there is no argument about it:
ALL HUMAN BEINGS, WITHOUT ANY EXCEPTION ANYWHERE, ARE VERY SEVERELY
MENTALLY ILL.
================================================================
+++ANALYSIS AND DIAGNOSIS+++
Joining these strands of knowledge together into an analysis of the
mental state of the human race, we have:
Collective amnesia - owing to the unbearably traumatic nature of our
infancy, both the infancy (early history) of the race and the infancy
of the individual person.
The amnesia - both collective and personal - is generating repetition
*compulsion* , meaning the 'unconscious' urge to recreate and relive
the forgotten trauma.
On the one hand, our personal lives and our societal and international
relations are disguised repetitions of the forgotten horrors of the
mother-infant relationship.
And at the same time, our collective death wish, our determination to
return the world to a state of survivalist emergency, is collective
repetition compulsion aimed at reliving the forgotten horrors of the
series of catastrophes - and subsequent survivalist emergencies - in
which all human behaviour is rooted.
Such is our collective and personal mental illness.
It is so terrifying that we don't let ourselves think about it, and so
we have devised and promoted a set of fake debates to conceal the
terrible truth about ourselves. These include the fake "science" of
"geology" and the *fake debate* on vivisection which conceals the
truth by reducing the 'debate' to a discussion on demanding *bigger
cages* for animals and similar, so as to eclipse the fact that
vivisection is about to destroy the world completely with the
avalanche of "animal tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons.
And in our determination to avoid seeing ourselves as we really are,
we will commit any act of cruelty / neglect / betrayal in order to
keep the truth out of our minds. That includes ostracising anybody who
speaks the truth and who advocates healing. It also includes
suppressing the primal urge to protect our babies from harm.
================================================================
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
Nothing will change in the foreseeable future. Another destruction of
civilisation is coming soon, the latest of many such destructions. The
Vivisection Swindle, with its avalanche of UNTESTED poisons, is enough
in itself to guarantee the collapse of our civilisation.
And then?
Amazingly, after the coming collapse, we are going to build up a 'new'
civilisation based on the very same PAIN-GENERATING societal
arrangements! You have made that quite clear, and you are already
rehearsing it. Many people who see that the present civilisation is
doomed to collapse are right now relocating to remote areas and
setting up survivalist communities, FAITHFULLY RECYCLING AND
PERPETUATING THE SAME PAIN-GENERATING SOCIETAL ARRANGEMENTS AS
BEFORE!
================================================================
Q ---Why am I apparently the only person in the world who wants to
abolish societal arrangements which automatically generate pain?
A ---Well, I can only say that I looked back at my parents'
emotionally crippled state, in the wider context of the emotionally
crippled population that was Irish society in the 1950s, and in my
bewilderment I asked this question:
"what has this civilisation done to my parents to reduce them to such
an abject state of fear and shame?"
The answer came only late in life, the answer being that my parents
were an extreme example of a universal state of emotional crippling
that afflicts all human beings.
PUT SUCCINCTLY, I WANT OUR PAIN-GENERATING SOCIETAL ARRANGEMENTS
ABOLISHED BECAUSE I AM HORRIFIED THAT TWO PEOPLE SUCH AS MY MOTHER AND
MY FATHER EXISTED, AND I WANT NO MORE PEOPLE SUCH AS MY MOTHER AND MY
FATHER TO EXIST, AS EXTREME VICTIMS OF THESE MISERY-MAKING SURVIVALIST-
MODE SOCIETAL ARRANGEMENTS.
What it means is that I have had enough of the pain which is
automatically generated by our sick societal arrangements. The rest of
you have not had enough of this pain yet, and so you are determined to
preserve and perpetuate your societal arrangements which guarantee
pain, even suppressing your parenting impulse in your addiction to
pain, a pain which you are determined to inflict on your children and
on all your descendants too.
What alarms me very much is that pain makes no impression on human
beings.
No matter how much and how long you suffer as a result of your pain-
generating societal arrangements, you do not want to end your pain by
abolishing those pain-generating societal arrangements.
That is another major symptom of your mental illness.
It is the trap in which your amnesia places you.
THE JOB WILL DO ITSELF?
You sense your impotence, and so you resort to *the-job-will-do-
itself* wishful thinking, such as the "second coming" of the half-man-
half-planet Jesus, or the "great spiritual awakening" that supposedly
will appear out of nowhere in the year 2012, and so on.
Tragically, the only REAL solution is to intensify your pain.
If you have parents like mine in a future incarnation, will that shift
you?
Is that what it takes?
If so I sincerely pity you.
But if that is the only way to cure you of your mental illness, then
that is my wish for all of you.
================================================================
Related links:
"I Still Miss Someone"
http://www.network54.com/Forum/57466/thread/1193285565/last-1193285565/I+Still+Miss+Someone
"Imperatrice Nuda revisited"
http://groups.google.ie/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_thread/thread/ecfa0106e8c7bbe9?hl=en
================================================================
Old Jinglebollocks
Ishtar
established fact that the human species is suffering from certain
delusions and fears upon which facts and logic make no impression.
Still, there is a certain urge to speak the truth just for the record
at a time like this - before the end comes. I suppose it's a case of
action-reaction..... to balance the Gill Langley syndrome just a
little bit, as the Vivisection Swindle has gone to far. No progress
is
possible now. We surrendered formally to the ruling group in 1990.
The
ruling group have 'got us.' But there is still a sense of the truth
needing to be told before the end comes.
The recent cluster of suicides in South Wales is an embarrassment.
What have we done to these young people to make them feel that it is
better to be dead than to be alive in the civilisation we - their
parents - have bequeathed to them?
The Vivisection Swindle is never mentioned in this context and only a
very few people understand its relevance.
If you read pages 9 to 11 of 'IMPERATRICE NUDA' by Hans Ruesch, you
will see immediately that all the new chemical substances that have
been released into the environment in the past half century to fuel
our ever expanding hi-tech civilisation HAVE NEVER BEEN TESTED FOR
SAFETY.
So-called "animal tests" are the same as NO TEST AT ALL.
The MILLIONS of new chemical substances that have been flowing out of
the vivisection laboratories and into our water, air, soil, food,
blood, bones, tissues and brains for the past half century HAVE NEVER
BEEN TESTED FOR SAFETY.
We can't cope with this, so we gladly accept Gill Langley's FAKE
DEBATE on the Vivisection Swindle, which conceals the terrible
reality.
"We need bigger cages for these poor animals...... we must find
alternatives.......... give us your money....." So goes Gill
Langley's
FAKE DEBATE on the Vivisection Swindle.
The avalanche of "animal tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons flooding into
the
environment has been progressively rotting our brains for the past
half century.... Hence the 'dumbing down' in the 'education' system,
and the clearly observable fact that human beings are much more
stupid
and much more cowardly than we were twenty years ago. Our brains are
rotted with "animal tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons.
Just read pages 9 to 11 of 'IMPERATRICE NUDA' by Hans Ruesch - if you
have the guts to face this.
The bottom line is - these young people who are committing suicide en
masse have had their brains rotted and poisoned by the avalanche of
"animal tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons flowing out of the vivisection
laboratories.
=====================
"IMPERATRICE NUDA revisited"
http://groups.google.ie/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_thread/thread/ecfa0106e8c7bbe9?hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2FThe-Voice-of-the-Voiceless%2Fbrowse_thread%2Fthread%2Fecfa0106e8c7bbe9%3Fhl%3Den
"Suicide Plan Overdue"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/7253481.stm
Ishtar
> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> > Vermont towns vote to arrest Bush and Cheney
> > Tue Mar 4, 2008 11:21pm EST
> > WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Voters in two Vermont towns on Tuesday approved a
> > measure that would instruct police to arrest President George W. Bush and
> > Vice President Dick Cheney for "crimes against our Constitution," local
> > media reported.
================================================================
Hmmmmmmm.... it's a glorious thought, but do not imagine that anyone
has the guts to see this through.
Historically it doesn't work. Remember the glaring example of the
Citizens' Arrest Inititative of 1990, the proposal to arrest all
known
vivisectors worldwide so as to force the issue of The Vivisection
Swindle out in the open via the courts...... nobody had the guts to
see it through...... not even Bette Overell or Javier Burgos........
........ there are historical and psychological reasons for our
acceptance of the ruling group and of the ultimate fate that awaits
us
as the present civilisation continues to decay under the weight of
the
avalanche of "animal tested" (=UNTESTED) poisons.
http://www.nzavs.org.nz/mobilise/27/12.html
http://groups.google.ie/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_threa...
================================================================
Ishtar
Dead men tell no tales.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article2500299.ece
THAT IS NOT WHAT HANS WOULD HAVE WANTED.
THAT IS NOT THE WAY HANS WANTED TO BE REMEMBERED.
Those fake "obituaries" for Hans Ruesch were prepared by the
mainstream media editors well in advance of his death, which came much
later than anyone expected. Milly Schaer-Manzoli was rotting six feet
under well before Hans died.
Those "obituaries" were all designed to be part of the *fake debates*
that Hans was trying so hard to destroy.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless/browse_thread/thread/ecfa0106e8c7bbe9/6d670809aac23e52?hl=en&lnk=st&q=imperatrice+nuda+revisited&_done=%2Fgroup%2FThe-Voice-of-the-Voiceless%2Fbrowse_thread%2Fthread%2Fecfa0106e8c7bbe9%2F6d670809aac23e52%3Fhl%3Den%26lnk%3Dst%26q%3Dimperatrice%2Bnuda%2Brevisited
Ishtar
I knew that man, Hans Ruesch, better than anyone.
Some may dispute that, but the fact remains that I know what is going
on in the present civilisation and I know where Hans Ruesch fits in to
the scheme of things.
Those survivalist-mode hacks are just parrots.
I could have written his true obituary.