Jamie> The reason I like a court hierarchy is, being made of all moderated
Jamie> material of the same subject, it stands apart from any other
Jamie> hierarchies.
Hmmm. How does it stand apart from "misc.*"?
Why not something like "misc.legal.courts.us", or if you must,
"misc.courts.us"?
Aren't new hierarchies pretty difficult to create (or rather, to
propagate), Jamie? Maybe we can start a gritton.* hierarchy instead. :-)
--
Bob Myers Unocal Energy Resources Division
Internet: Bob....@st.unocal.com Exploration and Seismic Technology
Phone: [714] 693-6951 P. O. Box 68076
Anaheim, California 92817-8076
> Hmmm. How does it stand apart from "misc.*"?
Well, nothings really stands apart from misc, but we still have
other hierarchies.
> Why not something like "misc.legal.courts.us", or if you must,
> "misc.courts.us"?
Another reason I think it should have its own hierarchy is that the
distribution of this group may end up being quite different than in
other hierarchies (what with the state courts and all).
> Aren't new hierarchies pretty difficult to create (or rather, to
> propagate), Jamie?
Indeed. But I hold that us.* isn't dead yet. It just might need
that "official sanction" that shouldn't be required.
> Maybe we can start a gritton.* hierarchy instead. :-)
Actually, I was considering proposing misc.people.gritton.james
(need the last in case my brother decides to post). I definitely fall
under misc.*.
--
James Gritton - gri...@byu.edu - I disclaim