> yes, this should be suitable.
Or perhaps not.
AFAICT this relies on files *on disk* which are SF_DATALESS. But
the files have to be on disk already. You can't chdir(2) into an
invisible directory which will spawn into existence. The directory
has to already be on disk as SF_DATALESS, which means that this
might work for your user root directory, but it can't realize the
unified global namespace. Essentially every new user root that you
want to access would need to be a new "domain".
--
Aram Hăvărneanu