So my thoughts are these:
1. To clarify, the invite is for them to accept the resolution we've written. Given both parties maintain unsatisfactory positions on LGBT issues, I expect both will say something along the lines of "hum, very interesting, young people are great!" Julie Bishop in particular will not say anything offensive precisely because she's a politician; if she wants to indicate she disagrees with us, she'll simply refuse to attend.
2. I don't think this has any bearing on our (us+partners) relationship with the state government; this is a very international conference in its focus. Indeed, given divided government between state and feds, it would make some sense to hedge our bets.
3. If the opposition attended, it would be a powerful opportunity to shift the political discourse on these issues. After all, we expect the left to take our side. To bring over the right as well would actually make sizeable change.
4. As a point of principle, we invite both parties to accept the youth dec (like this youth resolution, only broader and drawn up by our national conference).
5. I suppose I have a somewhat selfish (pro-UNYA) desire that we butter our bread on both sides where we can. This is especially true since we will need to work assiduously to preserve the Youth Rep when the next government takes over (if we can preserve it in this one).
6. I agree that inviting the opposition instead of the government would send a very negative signal. But the idea here is both attend. If we invite Gov and only opp attends, well that's a very interesting state of affairs, no? I imagine this fact can be leaked back to the Gov and they'll drum someone up.
7. I agree with Michael that since the point here is to present a policy document, rather than an expression fo gratitude, there is much more reason for us to be broad. If this were an invitation to keynote, I agree we'd need to restrict ourselves to government. But this is political policy.
So my current inclination is to invite both. Further thoughts?
A.