Ive raised this with GAP previously regarding the injector values for my 5.0 SC and was told the standard 'we expose everything that is available'. I know this isn't correct as if you plug in an SDD it gives injector by injector values for mis-fires and I've seen it myself.
I do wish GAP would investigate queries a bit before cutting and pasting their standard replies.
Unfortunately for all the good reports GAP get about their customer service my experience hasn't supported that which is a shame as I agree it's a powerful and very convenient piece of kit
You can buy the dongle "Mongoose Pro" for around 33 its comes with software that only runs on windows 7. All of it is a copy and not legitimate in any way.
However it goes way beyond what others offer and if you want to dig deep into a problem its the only way.
I'm attempting to do some round tuning and would appreciate if someone could have a look at a log file. i think i have maxed out my injectors but just want to make sure its not something in my settings before i look at larger injectors, I'm also experiencing fuel cut at around 4500rpm
The knock control doesnt have any cylinder tables assigned. There is a trigger error but not too many clues as to the reason. I would start by doing a trigger scope at about 4000rpm to see if that shows any issues. If nothing is obvious in the scope, then since the error occurs at max boost around peak torque I would say it is likely related to noise from the ignition system getting in somewhere.
Start with knock setup Gain Channel on 1 instead of 10. Ideally you want to see it hovering at around 200 or so free revving at a few thousand rpm. Normally until you are getting reasonable readings I would not have it retarding timing at all until you get it reading reasonable values where you can create a threshold table based on the readings. Currently it's pulling 10degrees any time the knock signal is above zero (your threshold table is all zeros).
You would generally gather data on what values are not knock, and then in a controlled environment, introduce knock and see what the values show. Your threshold is then somewhere between these two values.
@koracing himself taught me (I think) to slowly rev the engine in neutral, so no load. Do this to the limiter while logging, and it should show the values increase with RPMs. Set your threshold slightly above this, so it also hopefully doesn't trigger under full load. I sort of used this to gauge if there is any abnormal wear with the engine after initial tuning.
Hello, everyone. I am trying to get the vault-agent-injector working in my K8s cluster, and am seeing an issue where the mutating web hook does not seem to get triggered. Can anyone please give feedback on the best next steps? I have included all my steps taken below.
Even though debug logging is enabled, nothing is there in the vault-agent-injector pod logs and container logs, so it seems the web hook does not get triggered for some reason. The logs only display content like the following:
b. Perform a GET request to In the output I see the settings are there. To test if the kubernetes_ca_cert is valid, I tried running kubectl get pod while manually passing the certificate there. It is working, so the cert seems valid.
At this point I wondered if mutating web hooks were enabled at all for the cluster. In the master node, I reviewed the kube-apiserver yaml and confirmed --enable-admission-plugins has both MutatingAdmissionWebhook and ValidatingAdmissionWebhook there.
But the fact that you can access it via Ingress and not via Service does say a lot. When that curl request is made to , the Network Policies that are taken into consideration are the Egress rules for test-pod-for-vault and the Ingress rules for your Ingress controllers which are probably both allowing
0.0.0.0/0 (plus the relevant rules for the inter-namespace communication). At this point, I would just take a better look at the Network Policies you have in place.
As a test, I updated the policy to allow the incoming connections from my test-pod namespace, but still did not see anything. I also noticed that we do not have any network policy specific to the vault web hook. I am wondering if this may be related.
Assuming that the Vault Webhook is running in the same namespace as Vault, the Network Policy needs to allow not only the test namespace but also the Kubernetes API itself to call the Webhook endpoint. See my last point in the post above.
This makes sense. I tried temporarily removing all the network policies in my vault namespace, and the webhook started to get triggered. Now I need to figure out a policy that will allow the webhook to get triggered.
There was a problem with my Vault Kubernetes auth config. I went through the process again and the vault agent injector is now able to inject the secrets into my test pod! Thank you so much for the help.
I was reviewing this clusterrole for istio-operator. It has very wide-ranging permissions within the cluster. Compared to my vault-agent-injector clusterrole and clusterrolebinding, it only has the following in the vault namespace only:
Id1050x injectors im trying to scale on a subaru 32bit ecu. Set the cranking to 0.70 which is 30%. But the car still wont fire over? I followed the steps in injector scaling but still no luck? It will start on the factory cranking tables a,b,c,d,e,f. Also 0.70 in the throttle tip in enrichment. I have put the correct injector flow scaling and injector latency? This is not the first time its happen after changing injector data. Any help would be appreciated.
Cranking fuel on a subaru is a table of injector on times. Perhaps you're saying you are multiplying all values by 0.7 to subtract 30% from the on time when adjusting from stock to 1050x injectors? If so, that's still a bit too much fuel, but you're on the right track. 1050x flow 1065cc/min at 3 bar, almost exactly double stock.
Be sure to adjust all cranking tables. Other than that, it's just injector latency, low IPW data, fuel scalar, and the car will start on 1050x unless you have an issue unrelated to the different injectors.
For example MAF scaling doesn't get adjusted before you start the engine with new injectors, but still needs to be appropriate for the intake present, something like an air leak could be an issue, etc.
I was having a similar issue trying to scale 1050x id injectors. also dont see low IPW data pid on ecuflash or romraider. i can get her to start but its a long hard start, adding fuel in the cranking tables helps but it always wants more it seems, also when at idle if i rev the engine it wont go back down to 800rpm, it starts adding rpms to the idle every snap of the throttle till it reaches 2000rpm then starts drops to idle and keeps bouncing... also if i reinstall my accessport it starts, idles and revs normally? any insght would be greatly appreciated
ID1050x work very well with the ID provided data. Cars are generally within 3% fuel trim on base files, so if you enter all their Subaru specific 1050x data, for your base fuel pressure and are having issues after adjusting the other injector flow related tables such as cranking fuel, tip in, tip out, the car should run well unless there's a mechanical or electrical fault.
I use COBB's ATP software and haven't seen ECUflash in over a decade so I don't know what's available at this point, but COBB has the ability to input all the data ID provides. Hopefully you can find a low IPW comp table in your ROM.
Again though, if there's a mechanical fault, like an air leak on a MAF tune, using correct values will not result in correct operation, so if you aren't having success by following the instruction in the reflash tuning course, Subaru worked example, then there's a good chance you're fighting something about the physical setup, rather than the tune itself.
thank you, so i have no issues when using access tuner software however my 08sti has had sec air and tgv delete since 2012 so now i cant save any new adjustments can only fiddle with realtime tables. does anyone know why my romraider log files wont load in megalog viewer it says log file contains no data or is not recognized. i can open in excel
I got hold of the correct injector data for ecuflash for id 1050x if you need help. I will need your rom file to make the changes. With megalog veiwer it should work. Convert it to a csv file if its in another file format.
omg i just figured out my issue... im slow, so i have the old style cobb 4bar map sensor, and just ported over the calibration and did not notice the value in ecuflash was psia and calibration sheet had no value but was in bar.... once i converted to psi everything started to work properly... lol so happy now can't believe it took me so long to figure out my mistake... thank you guys for the help
One of the primary goals for any racing engine builder is to extract the maximum amount of power possible from a given engine size. Achieving this goal is as valuable for multiple cylinder, 500 or more cubic inch displacement automobile racing engines as it is for single cylinder, small displacement go-cart racing engines. Fuel injection systems have been manufactured that substantially increase the torque and power output of multiple cylinder engines. An electronic fuel injection system was developed for a Briggs & Stratton single cylinder gasoline engine that is similar to the type of engine used in most go-cart racing divisions.
3a8082e126