FW: Important Advisory about Amazon's Appstore Distribution Terms

Skip to first unread message

Cliff Owen

Apr 14, 2011, 10:53:08 AM4/14/11
to unity3d-d...@googlegroups.com

For those who are doing Android development and looking at Amazon, I thought this might be interesting. I do Android and signed up immediately but didn’t have time to read the licensing terms (they’re pretty long), and so I haven’t actually submitted yet.... This is it in a nutshell. I’m not suggesting doing or not doing, but I am suggesting a standard “look before you leap” approach so you are not surprised later. My own experiences in the Google Marketplace have been so mixed I couldn’t begin to speculate if the note below is better or worse for me, so your own mileage may vary.


Having trouble viewing this email? Click here  <http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=n7ile9dab&v=001YCG7_2nRMIq2Nbj4AmnFUNWDQJVBFuDXMfbBePVbl0xxG60YbP9MUeemaaFdFaHIPdA4Jtsav5hDh74_e3DlPoNLA_M9rlPg_1XjUrLMo6kxXWw3jq-Fp7cr5Pfycff_yy-wsjSDBa46fJLVLg1uxU38Iqb4V364lxKcsYFmxReVKM9RQ4igp5E9FyocZY7PbJs4dsyTSPOcJJzqoKOybXv2WC57F461>

Important Advisory about Amazon's Appstore Distribution Terms  

To all members of the game development community:

Two weeks ago, Amazon launched its own Android Appstore. We know that many developers have been eagerly looking forward to that launch in hopes that it would represent a great new revenue opportunity and a fresh take on downloadable game merchandising. The IGDA applauds Amazon's efforts to build a more dynamic app marketplace. However, the IGDA has significant concerns about Amazon's current Appstore distribution terms and the negative impact they may have on the game development community, and we urge developers to educate themselves on the pros and cons of submitting content to Amazon.

Many journalists have noted the unusual nature of Amazon's current store terms, but little has been said about the potential implications of those terms. In brief: Amazon reserves the right to control the price of your games, as well as the right to pay you "the greater of 70% of the purchase price or 20% of the List Price." While many other retailers, both physical and digital, also exert control over the price of products in their markets, we are not aware of any other retailer having a formal policy of paying a supplier just 20% of the supplier's minimum list price without the supplier's permission.

Furthermore, Amazon dictates that developers cannot set their list price above the lowest list price "available or previously available on any Similar Service." In other words, if you want to sell your content anywhere else, you cannot prevent Amazon from slashing the price of your game by setting a high list price. And if you ever conduct even a temporary price promotion in another market, you must permanently lower your list price in Amazon's market.

These Amazon policies could have far reaching effects on game developers. The IGDA has identified five potentially problematic scenarios in particular:

1) Amazon steeply discounts a large chunk of its Appstore catalog (imagine: "our top 100-rated games are all 75% off!"). Some developers will probably win in this scenario, but some developers -- most likely, those near the bottom of the list -- will lose, not gaining enough sales to offset the loss in revenue per sale. Amazon benefits the most, because it captures all the customer goodwill generated by such a promotion.

2) By requiring all developers to guarantee Amazon a minimum list price that matches the lowest price on any other market, Amazon has presented developers with a stark choice: abandon Amazon's market or agree never to give another distributor an exclusive promotional window.

3) Other digital markets that compete with Amazon (both existing markets and markets yet-to-be-created) may feel compelled to duplicate Amazon's terms, and perhaps even adopt more severe terms in an effort to compete effectively with Amazon. In essence, we're looking at a slippery slope in which a developer's "minimum list price" ceases to be a meaningful thing.  4) Amazon steeply discounts (or makes entirely free) a game that has a well-defined, well-connected niche audience. The members of that niche audience snap up the game during the promotional period, robbing the game's developer of a significant percentage of its total potential revenue from its core audience.

5) Amazon steeply discounts (or makes entirely free) a hit game at a time when the game is already selling extremely well. This sort of promotional activity may attract consumers away from competing markets and into Amazon's arms. But it might actually represent a net loss for the developer, which was already doing quite well and didn't need to firesale its game at that moment in time.

The IGDA's bottom line is simple: under Amazon's current terms, Amazon has little incentive not to use a developer's content as a weapon with which to capture marketshare from competing app stores.
The IGDA does not have the power or inclination to dictate how others conduct their business. However, the IGDA is permitted to express its views on business practices that affect the developer community, and it is the firm opinion of the IGDA that:

1) A developer's permission should be required by any retailer seeking to pay less than the standard percentage of a developer's minimum list price. This could be automated and even "opt-out" with a reasonable period of notice, but ultimately, a developer's permission should still be required.

2) Developers should have the freedom to set a minimum list price of whatever amount they see fit, without regard to pricing in other app stores.

The IGDA has formally communicated its views to Amazon, and while Amazon has been very willing to engage with the IGDA, it has thus far expressed zero willingness to adjust its distribution terms. We believe that the people currently running Amazon's Appstore may have the best of intentions and a desire to make their development partners successful, in general. The problem, as history has repeatedly demonstrated, is that things tend to change when a marketplace achieves any degree of dominance. The terms of Amazon's distribution agreement give it significant flexibility to behave in a manner that may harmful to individual developers in the long run. Any goodwill that Amazon shows developers today may evaporate the minute Amazon's Appstore becomes so big that Android developers have no choice but to distribute their content via the store. It would be foolish to assume that because Amazon's Appstore is small today, it will not become the Walmart of the Android ecosystem tomorrow.  If Amazon responds to this open letter, it will likely invoke the success of games that have already been promoted in its Appstore; for example, games that have been featured as Amazon's free app of the day. The company may claim that the success of those games is proof that Amazon's model works. The IGDA believes that this argument is a red herring. Amazon does not need the terms it has established for itself in order to give away a free app every day. Nor does it need the powers it has granted itself to execute a wide variety of price promotions. Other digital games platforms, such as Xbox LIVE Arcade and Steam, manage to run effective promotions very frequently without employing these terms. Amazon may further argue that its success depends on the success of its development partners, and therefore, that it would never abuse the terms of its distribution agreement. Given that Amazon can (and currently does) function perfectly well without these terms in other markets, it is unclear why game developers should take a leap of faith on Amazon's behalf. Such leaps are rarely rewarded once a retailer achieves dominance. We respect Amazon's right to stay the course, but as part of our mission to educate developers, we feel that it is imperative to inform the community of the significant potential downside to Amazon's current Appstore terms. If you feel similarly, we urge you to communicate your feelings on this matter directly with Amazon. Sincerely, The IGDA Board of Directors   
<http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=001lwYzjV2-Vy7zknGYHmdQwA%3D%3D&se=001rUwYRbC21UA%3D&t=0012UVeiy5ibyPJWbk0LXRCHg%3D%3D&llr=n7ile9dab>  <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?pn=prometsource&cc=TEM_Basic_206>

This email was sent to cli...@swiftcreekgames.com by con...@igda.org |   
Update Profile/Email Address <http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=001lwYzjV2-Vy7zknGYHmdQwA%3D%3D&se=001rUwYRbC21UA%3D&t=0012UVeiy5ibyPJWbk0LXRCHg%3D%3D&llr=n7ile9dab> | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe <http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=001lwYzjV2-Vy7zknGYHmdQwA%3D%3D&se=001rUwYRbC21UA%3D&t=0012UVeiy5ibyPJWbk0LXRCHg%3D%3D&llr=n7ile9dab> £  |  Privacy Policy <http://ui.constantcontact.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp> .
International Game Developers Association | 19 Mantua Road | Mount Royal | NJ | 08061

------ End of Forwarded Message

Joaquin Grech

Apr 14, 2011, 11:12:22 AM4/14/11
to unity3d-d...@googlegroups.com
my only question... can you opt-out from amazon after you submitted your app? Meaning: removing it.
So if they engage in any unwanted behaviour, you could just get out of it asap. That would provide some peace of mind.

Joaquin Grech Gomendio

International MBA, Concentration in Finance & Entrepreneurship

IE Business School, Founder IE Spain Club, www.iespainclub.com

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Unity3D Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to unity3d-d...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Joe Schultz

Apr 14, 2011, 1:50:30 PM4/14/11
to unity3d-d...@googlegroups.com
Thanks to you Cliff & the IGDA for speaking out about this; disappointing news.

As I see it, this is Amazon trying to bully their way in the AppStore market by holding their customer base hostage against us devs i.e. playing dirty.

Find this unacceptable in just about every way imaginable, and as a result, they can go f%#@ themselves for all I care. Because, really that's what they want to do to us devs.

Saying to Amazon "I won't sign up, I won't support you, I will actively discourage your AppStore with other devs. Play nice, or GTFO!"

30% is more than fair remit for sharing their customer base & running some automated php on their servers. Apple has paved the way with how such a relationship should be, and it works.

The future isn't "more limits on devs", no it's the opposite actually, as Unity Tech. has embraced well.

Hope we devs don't give our power away to this bullying. There's no justification for it and the downside is much worse (for everyone) than the upside (which benefits only very few).

"Amazon, first wikileaks, now this? You just went from bad to worse! STFU!"
Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages