Hi,
Which at least for the RI and TCK would be adopted equally.
- Either use the new official units.tech namespace for all aspects of JSR 385 (except the API with its standard packages)
- Or stick to the virtual predecessor units.tec
What do you prefer?
The same official TLD uom.tech is also registered, hence if the preference for the JSR artifacts was on .tech other libraries should also follow.
Looking at MavenCentral:
https://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C10%7Ctech. there are around 200 artifacts using the .tech namespace now. The only ones using .tec (in the absense of a working .tech domain back in 2014) are projects related to JSR 363.
I know, Indriya 1.0 is already out under tec.units, but if we find tech.units was better for 2.0 a service release like 1.1 could also implement the switch. All other implementations of JSR 363 will not be changed regardless of the choice for 2.0.
Thanks,
Werner