Re: Sky Fighters Apk Hile

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Hermelindo Sauceda

unread,
Jul 16, 2024, 4:18:01 PM7/16/24
to unexedas

Now instead of using Fighters as scouts like we had for decades. We have to worry about setting them on "Patrol" to pop subs, when all it takes is a few LC moved into the patrol area to make that useless.

The mechanic isn't "25% of damage" dealt, it's "25% of att/def strength used to calculate whether damage is incurred." If damage is dealt, it's dealt in full hit points, not 1/4 hit points. They need to either fix the coding so it's actually 25% of the damage, or correct the phrasing of the description. I vote they make it 25% of damage.

A better correction would be if fighter patrol reverted to the original, i.e., only attacking enemy aircraft, and bomber patrol was the one that interacted with ground units. There's no reason for a fighter on patrol to attempt to attack ground units, just like there's no reason for a bomber on patrol to attempt to attack other air units.

sky fighters apk hile


DOWNLOAD https://tlniurl.com/2ySd41



On a side note, unless I'm wildly mistaken, fighters have always been at risk for damage from enemy ground units while patrolling, but the incidence of damage taken was much, much lower. Like 24-28 hours before any real risk of losing the fighter was incurred.

i know airplanes are overpowered in this game for long time ... but fighters being shut down by infantry while patroling is just too much .. you cant even scout hidden units inside fort anymore without losing fighters

infantry do not have anti aircraft weapons shooting fighters while patroling with rifles is waste of bullets .. airplanes fly too high in the sky prehaps the only infantry chance to shoot back is when fighters is flying lower to the ground

As far as the new mechanic is concerned where patrolling has become borderline unusable (and this is being sold as an improvement to their "flexibility", just to add some insult to it), it's awful, no doubt about it. The fact that a developer even came up with the idea that fighters on patrol should attack ground units is quite disheartening, not even to mention that this nonsense was actually implemented.

Edit: Well arguably, for an aircraft to effectively scout in 1914, when the only tool available to do it would have been binoculars, maybe it would have had to descend to dangerous altitudes to actually see stuff. Let's give a benefit of doubt point for realism. This however doesn't help with the in-game balance, which I think has shifted extremely heavily against aircraft with this change.

Patrolling bombers are now more powerful because I am in a game where five groups of 2 bombers patrolling over a major battlegroup wiped it out in less than 2 hours simply by moving the patrol every time the BG moved. Oh and with careful usage, there wasn't a single bomber lost. Oh, btw, we're talking 2 BBs, 43 arty, 3 ACs and 330 infantry lost.

Yep! Exactly what HardEight just recommended.. I've found balloons and AC are the best defence for protecting marching stacks against aircraft. As far as the losing aircraft on patrol was a real thing during war in 1914. Remember it only takes one well placed bullet from a ground troop to kill a pilot or damage an airplane enough to make it malfunction and crash. Yes they were a factor and yes many realized an aircrafts future potential as a weapon. But in 1914 they aren't what won the war.

Yo, so my fighter got wrecked patrolling your fort, and the only baddies there were foot soldiers! Did your guys get ninja anti-air guns, or are planes super weak now? I think maybe another plane of mine accidentally messed it up, or maybe the game's just glitching. Let's check the replay and see what went down, bro. If it wasn't one of those things, we gotta tell the grown-ups about this bug mess.

The number of fire fighters struck and killed by motor vehicles has dramatically increased within recent years. During the 5-year period between 1995 and 1999, 17 fire fighters were struck and killed by motorists. This represents an 89% increase in the number of line-of-duty deaths over the previous 5-year period (between 1990 and 1994), when 9 fire fighters were struck and killed by motor vehicles [NFPA 2000]. Under the Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program, NIOSH investigated two separate incidents involving fire fighters who were struck and killed while providing emergency services along roadways during 1999 [NIOSH 1999, 2000]. These incidents and data demonstrate that hazards to the fire service are not limited to structural or wild land fires. Motorists accustomed to a clear, unobstructed roadway may not recognize and avoid closed lanes or emergency workers on or near the roadway. In some cases, conditions can reduce a motorist?s ability to see and avoid fire fighters and apparatus. Some examples include weather, time of day, scene lighting (i.e., area lighting and optical warning devices), traffic speed and volume, and road configuration (i.e., hills, curves, and other obstructions that limit visibility). These hazards are not limited to the fire service alone. Other emergency service providers such as law enforcement officers, paramedics, and vehicle recovery personnel are also exposed to these hazards.

On August 5, 1999, one fire fighter died, and a second fire fighter and another person were severely injured when they were struck by a motor vehicle that lost control on a wet and busy interstate highway [NIOSH 1999]. A heavy-rescue squad and a ladder truck had been dispatched to a single motor vehicle crash on an interstate highway. Approximately 2 minutes after they arrived on the scene and took a position to the rear of the rescue squad (protecting the initial vehicle crash scene), another car collided with the back of the ladder truck (Figure 1). While attending to the injuries of the driver who struck the ladder truck, two fire fighters and the injured driver were struck by a third car, causing one fire fighter to be fatally injured and the second fire fighter and the driver (who had collided with the back of the ladder truck) to be severely injured.

On September 27, 1999, a fire fighter died after being struck by a tractor trailer truck while directing traffic along a four-lane highway [NIOSH 2000]. The victim was standing in front of an apparatus that was parked (facing north) in the outer emergency lane for the southbound traffic. The emergency lights of the apparatus were on and functioning properly at the time of the incident. He was called out to provide assistance for a neighboring fire department that had responded to a tractor-trailer crash. The initial tractor-trailer crash and subsequent fire fighter fatality occurred during a heavy rainstorm along a 1-mile stretch of a four-lane highway. Thirty-nine collisions have occurred on this 1-mile stretch of road since 1994.

Any fire fighter working along any type of roadway runs the risk of being struck by a motorist. To prevent such incidents, NIOSH recommends that fire departments and fire fighters take the following actions:

The principal contributors to this publication were Mark F. McFall and Eric R. Schmidt, NIOSH. Internal review was provided by Stephanie Pratt, DSR, NIOSH. External reviews were provided by Rita Fahy, National Fire Protection Association; Barbara Hauser, County Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Arizona; Gary Morris, Phoenix Fire Department, Phoenix, Arizona; Ron Moore, Plano Fire Department, Plano, Texas; Guenther Lerch, Professional Engineer.

NIOSH [1999]. One fire fighter died and a second fire fighter was severely injured after being struck by a motor vehicle on an interstate highway?OK. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 99F?27.

NIOSH [2000]. Volunteer fire fighter died after being struck by an eighteen-wheel tractor trailer truck?SC. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 99F?38.

U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration [1998]. Standards and guides for traffic controls for street and highway construction, maintenance, utility, and incident management operations. Part VI of the manual on uniform traffic control devices (MUTCD). 3rd rev. Fredericksburg, VA: American Traffic Safety Services Association.

In May, Russia alleged that dozens of Ukrainian militants crossed into one of its border towns in the Belgorod region, striking targets and forcing an evacuation, before more than 70 of the attackers were killed or pushed back by what the authorities termed a counterterrorism operation. Ukrainian officials have denied any link with the group.

Meanwhile, one Ukrainian drone struck and set ablaze an oil refinery in the Nizhny Novgorod region, according to regional governor Gleb Nikitin. That region is located some about 775 kilometers (480 miles) from the Ukraine border.

Kyiv has staged increasingly bold attacks behind the 1,500-kilometer (930-mile) front line running through eastern and southern Ukraine. It has also increasingly deployed sea drones in the Black Sea, where it claims to have sunk Russian warships.

On June 30, 2013, Nineteen of the 20 members of the Granite Mountain Hotshots, an elite crew trained to fight wilderness fires, died as they battled a fire outside of Yarnell. The Granite Mountain Hotshots Memorial State Park is dedicated to their sacrifice.

59fb9ae87f
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages