Fwd: most recent copy of full PIF

[Mary Jean A. Caleda]

Here it is.

Sent from my Ipad

Begin forwarded message:

From: George Banez <george...@gmail.com>
Date: July 15, 2013, 3:31:01 PM GMT+08:00
To: "Mary Jean A. Caleda" <mj.c...@gmail.com>
Cc: Marge Lavides <mar...@haribon.org.ph>, Belinda DE LA PAZ <consti...@haribon.org.ph>, "rese...@haribon.org.ph" <rese...@haribon.org.ph>, "c...@haribon.org.ph" <c...@haribon.org.ph>
Subject: Re: most recent copy of full PIF

Hi Jean, Marge.

Here is the PIF version after the re-aligning the log frame with the first 3 Aichi Targets and the exchanges of emails. 

Please note:

1., the template is not word so, any major changes require changes to the spacing etc. of the whole form.

2.  it the economist who are saying that there is a limit to what know-how in valuation that we can transfer....it is important that we do not commit ourselves to what we can not deliver.

3.  the fine-tuning of the meaning of biodiversity valuation to mean "valuation of the ecosystem goods and services" came from economists (as I remember), the only reason, I included both terms in the draft log frame is so that the group is clear on what we mean by biodiversity valuation (which is still the operational word we use with a definition when first mentioned in the PIF).

4.  I tried to incorporate everything that was in the original PIF before JD comments while dropping the "objective" in every component as it is the same as Outcome to UNDP

5. spoke with NBSAP group on alignment etc..

Please read this version carefully and keep in mind that we are looking for the right wording to express what positive changes in biodiversity conservation we will see as a result of this project and how we will accomplish these changes.

Thanks,

George.

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Mary Jean A. Caleda <mj.c...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Marge,

Still waiting for the full revised PIF from George, ccd here.

Cheers,




Sent from my Ipad


On Jul 12, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Marge Lavides <mar...@haribon.org.ph> wrote:

> Hi Jean,
>
> I called you up at ASoG earlier today but you were out on official business. So I am emailing you instead.
>
> This is to request for the most recent version of the full PIF (not just the portion that George is sending) and including the proposed budget, so we (Beechie de la Paz, OIC; Marivic Pajaro, research manager and me, are on the same plane as per the status of the proposal. And which we in turn will confirm with Anabelle and Cristi to complete the loop.  As you may know, we, each one of us attending for Haribon, joined the project development exercise for this proposal at different stages and therefore should need to level off regarding this proposal.
>
> thank you, Marge

[Mary Jean Caleda]

 

Dear George and Team,

I will be out of the country from July 27-August 21.

 

If there are no further comments to this current version of the PIF, then we can send this back to Grace Tena already (cc'd here).

 

Otherwise, may I ask either George (UNDP Consultnat), Mark (REECS) and  Marivic/Belinda (Haribon)  to take lead while I am out. Just please take note that  GEF5 ends November 2013 so the earlier we resend this  the better.

 

Grace, I heard JD was comin in July? Is here here already?

 

Thanks  

 

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:31 PM, George Banez <george...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Jean, Marge.

Here is the PIF version after the re-aligning the log frame with the first 3 Aichi Targets and the exchanges of emails. 

Please note:

1., the template is not word so, any major changes require changes to the spacing etc. of the whole form.

2.  it the economist who are saying that there is a limit to what know-how in valuation that we can transfer....it is important that we do not commit ourselves to what we can not deliver.

3.  the fine-tuning of the meaning of biodiversity valuation to mean "valuation of the ecosystem goods and services" came from economists (as I remember), the only reason, I included both terms in the draft log frame is so that the group is clear on what we mean by biodiversity valuation (which is still the operational word we use with a definition when first mentioned in the PIF).

4.  I tried to incorporate everything that was in the original PIF before JD comments while dropping the "objective" in every component as it is the same as Outcome to UNDP

5. spoke with NBSAP group on alignment etc..

Please read this version carefully and keep in mind that we are looking for the right wording to express what positive changes in biodiversity conservation we will see as a result of this project and how we will accomplish these changes.

Thanks,

George.

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Mary Jean A. Caleda <mj.c...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Marge,

Still waiting for the full revised PIF from George, ccd here.

Cheers,




Sent from my Ipad


On Jul 12, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Marge Lavides <mar...@haribon.org.ph> wrote:

> Hi Jean,
>
> I called you up at ASoG earlier today but you were out on official business. So I am emailing you instead.
>
> This is to request for the most recent version of the full PIF (not just the portion that George is sending) and including the proposed budget, so we (Beechie de la Paz, OIC; Marivic Pajaro, research manager and me, are on the same plane as per the status of the proposal. And which we in turn will confirm with Anabelle and Cristi to complete the loop.  As you may know, we, each one of us attending for Haribon, joined the project development exercise for this proposal at different stages and therefore should need to level off regarding this proposal.
>
> thank you, Marge

--

-------------------------------------------------

Mary Jean A. Caleda, PhD, EnP
Ateneo School of Government
Ateneo de Manila University
Katipunan Avenue, Loyola Heights
Quezon City, 1108 Philippines

Tel. No.  :  +632 426 6001 local 4624
Fax No.  :  +632 426 5997
Mobile    :  +63 918 930 2638
E-mail    :   mj.c...@gmail.com

URL       :   www.asg.ateneo.edu, www.ateneo.edu

Transforming communities, building the nation.

[Grace Tena]

Hi Jean,

I have already submitted the revised PIF to JD and we will be discussing our comments when he arrives next week in Cebu.  He won’t be able to meet-up with your group since he will no longer fly to Manila from Cebu.

 

Thanks,

 

Grace A. Tena Energy and Environment United Nations Development Programme Philippines 30th Floor, Yuchengco Tower, RCBC Plaza 6819 Ayala Avenue, 1226 Makati City, Philippines grace...@undp.org Direct Line: (+632)901-0260 Mobile No: +63917-5415309 Fax No. (+632) 889-7177 http://www.undp.org.ph  Follow us:

[Mary Jean A. Caleda]

Okay, thanks.

Sent from my Ipad

On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Grace Tena <grace...@undp.org> wrote:

Hi Jean,

I have already submitted the revised PIF to JD and we will be discussing our comments when he arrives next week in Cebu.  He won’t be able to meet-up with your group since he will no longer fly to Manila from Cebu.

 

Thanks,

 

<image001.png>

Grace A. Tena Energy and Environment United Nations Development Programme Philippines 30th Floor, Yuchengco Tower, RCBC Plaza 6819 Ayala Avenue, 1226 Makati City, Philippines grace...@undp.org Direct Line: (+632)901-0260 Mobile No: +63917-5415309 Fax No. (+632) 889-7177

http://www.undp.org.ph  Follow us: <image002.png>  <image003.jpg>  <image004.png>   <image005.png>

<image006.gif>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "UNDP-GEF Proposal" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to undp-gef-propo...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to undp-gef...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/undp-gef-proposal.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.