Please read the emails below. It is very important. We need to be able to have proper representation.
Best,
Deni
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Joseline Pena-Melnyk" <jpena...@msn.com>
Date: Sep 27, 2013 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: CB-064-2013 and golf course hearing on October 2nd
To: "eol...@co.pg.md.us" <eol...@co.pg.md.us>, "Suchitra Balachandran" <cp_w...@yahoo.com>, "mccb...@verizon.net" <mccb...@verizon.net>, "patm...@verizon.net" <patm...@verizon.net>, "dtav...@gmail.com" <dtav...@gmail.com>
Thank you Eric for the notice. This does not give us enough time to organize appropriately.Unfortunately, I will be at a conference in DC on the morning of October, 2nd. Nevertheless, I have included Pat, Bonnie, Suchitra and Deni in this email. Deni created a Google group for the 17 civic associations that attended the meeting at my house a few months ago (she is representing Victor's office).Ladies, Please spread the word ASAP! The room must be packed! Deni, please post and make request to all the groups.Eric, would you please provide some guidance on how to present in front of the committee? What arguments to make? Would you also be so kind and provide address, time and room number? Thank you.Reply all.With gratitude,Joseline> From: EOl...@co.pg.md.us
> To: doylen...@verizon.net
> CC: nsta...@comcast.net; ballo...@msn.com; jcros...@yahoo.com; jpena...@msn.com; cah...@verizon.net; tawann...@hotmail.com; barbar...@house.state.md.us; Delegate...@house.state.md.us; MALe...@co.pg.md.us; ppi...@mceanea.org
> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:50:02 -0400
> Subject: Re: CB-064-2013 and golf course
>
> I agree with your analysis, Doyle. The hearing is this Wednesday Oct 2 at 10:30am at the Planning Zoning and Economic Development committee meeting of the County Council in Upper Marlboro. We need elected officials and residents to come out to testify against the bill.
>
> Thank you,
> Eric
>
> On Sep 27, 2013, at 12:36 PM, "Doyle Niemann" <doylen...@verizon.net<mailto:doylen...@verizon.net>> wrote:
>
> The county legislation that Mel Franklin proposed, which Carol Hurwitch alerted me to -- see link below -- would appear to be potentially very relevant to the golf course proposal.
>
> As I understand it, the bill will remove current language that puts property conveyed by the university (via the state, which has title) into a restrictive reserved open space category and replaces it with language that will allow a person who gets the land from the university/state (a developer, say) to petition directly to the council for a new zoning approval. That would remove a bunch of steps and make it easier to strong arm something through the council on an expedited basis.
>
> Conceivably, then, the university could transfer the land to our would-be developer, who could then try to leverage expedited approval through the council. This potentially would take the university out of the equation, providing them cover, and change the dynamic of the discussion.
>
> Perhaps we need legislation prohibiting the transfer of the land, similar to what was done for the Terrapin Parkway.
>
> Doyle Niemann
> 240-606-1298
> doylen...@verizon.net<mailto:doylen...@verizon.net>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Carol Hurwitch <cah...@verizon.net<mailto:cah...@verizon.net>>
> Date: September 27, 2013 at 9:43:13 AM EDT
> To: Doyle Niemann <doylen...@verizon.net<mailto:doylen...@verizon.net>>
> Subject: Fwd: CB-064-2013
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> 240-461-9238
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Carol Hurwitch <cah...@verizon.net<mailto:cah...@verizon.net>>
> Date: September 26, 2013, 10:29:43 PM EDT
> To: Carol Hurwitch <cah...@verizon.net<mailto:cah...@verizon.net>>
> Subject: CB-064-2013
>
>
> http://lis.princegeorgescountymd.gov/lis/docPopUp.asp?File=CB-64-2013&Type=BILLRES&Action=undefined
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
>
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Prince George’s
> County Government or Prince George's County 7th Judicial Circuit
> Court proprietary information or Protected Health Information,
> which is privileged and confidential. This E-mail is intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
> copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and
> attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited by federal law
> and may expose you to civil and/or criminal penalties. If you have
> received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately
> and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and
> any printout.