Please try this one:
http://umbel.org/ontology/v072/umbel_abstract_concepts_v072.n3
Also, can you point me out to the faulty file / lines?
Finally, is it the same issue we had at that time (thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/umbel-ontology/browse_frm/thread/008d08ff59742293#)
Thanks!
Take care,
Fred
ac:Function_Denotational (line 4089)
ac:InformationBearingThing (line 5225)
ac:SetOrCollection (lines 8736)
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "UMBEL"
> group.
> To post: umbel-o...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe: umbel-ontolog...@googlegroups.com
> Group home: http://groups.google.com/group/umbel-ontology?hl=en
> The file you link to below is exactly the same as the one linked from
> the documentation page. Yes, it is the same issue you had before, as
> described in that thread. The problems are in the definitions of the
> following concepts (some of which also have other issues, beyond the
> character encoding problem):
>
> ac:Function_Denotational (line 4089)
> ac:InformationBearingThing (line 5225)
> ac:SetOrCollection (lines 8736)
Good thanks.
I will keep an eye on this while doing version 0.8 of umbel (we should
start by the end of this week, and it should spans over a couple of
weeks). Also note that the Abstract-Concept class should be deprecated
(we will explains why when we will release this new version).
Thanks!
Take care,
Fred