WSPR pico balloon flight from the UK

382 views
Skip to first unread message

Medad rufus

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 2:13:02 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
Due to the ban in the UK from airborne transmissions on amatuer radio frequencies, it appears that nobody(or very few people) in the UK has attempted a WSPR long range pico balloon flight from UK soil.

The benefits of WSPR is unmatched compared to other radio modulation schemes. The range is spectacular. Just looking at PS-80, it is being received nearly 10 000km away.

image.png


To overcome UK restrictions and do a WSPR flight from UK soil, I propose the following steps:
  1.  Acquire an American Amatuer radio licence. It appears to be straight forward according to recent conversations on this group. Launch from the UK and then transmit only when outside UK airspace with US ham licence.
  2. I understand that the balloon should be smaller than a 2m(cube? or sphere?). To comply, I would suggest making a mechanism that rolls up the long 20 meter antenna wires into a spool, that is then unfurled and then dropped off over international waters. Is this a crazy idea?
Or is there a simpler way to do this? Has anyone done it legally from UK soil?

Regards
Medad M7RUF

Mark Jessop

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 7:15:09 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
It's also worth noting that while WSPR does have very good low SNR performance, this is only because it's running at a super slow baud rate, and the amount of data transmitted is extremely limited. If you dialed down my 4FSK mode to 1 baud (and tweaked the modem to work as such a low rate) it would probably work over just as long a range as well... 

The 'regular' WSPR spec is only going to give you a grid-square of positional accuracy, which is pretty coarse. There have been various bastardisations of the WSPR protocol to enable transmission of extra data, which I believe is how VK3YT is sending more accurate positional information. This does require a modified version of WSJT-X to decode.

All trade-offs I guess...

73
Mark VK5QI

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "UKHAS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ukhas+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ukhas/CAKuB44R9fiA9RppuCNx9jZ3gM4xzdLS6Pq5A8iavXeNHmHt-mg%40mail.gmail.com.

Chris Partridge-NewsG

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 7:32:41 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
For the information of Medad M7RUF there is an enclaved one acre of US soil to the west of London.

The John F Kennedy Memorial at Runnymede.   In 1976, at the 200th anniversary, of the Declaration of Independence we applied for and were granted by the US FCC the licence WG1JFK to operated from this “One acre of US soil”. There was no UK administration involvement.

Maybe this could be your launch site?  The initial airspace above being US.

73 de G8AUU es SO6AUU/9

On 23 Oct 2020, at 08:15, Mark Jessop <lennieth...@gmail.com> wrote:

It's also worth noting that while WSPR does have very good low SNR performance, this is only because it's running at a super slow baud rate, and the amount of data transmitted is extremely limited. If you dialed down my 4FSK mode to 1 baud (and tweaked the modem to work as such a low rate) it would probably work over just as long a range as well... 

The 'regular' WSPR spec is only going to give you a grid-square of positional accuracy, which is pretty coarse. There have been various bastardisations of the WSPR protocol to enable transmission of extra data, which I believe is how VK3YT is sending more accurate positional information. This does require a modified version of WSJT-X to decode.

All trade-offs I guess...

73
Mark VK5QI

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:43 PM Medad rufus <medad...@gmail.com> wrote:
Due to the ban in the UK from airborne transmissions on amatuer radio frequencies, it appears that nobody(or very few people) in the UK has attempted a WSPR long range pico balloon flight from UK soil.

The benefits of WSPR is unmatched compared to other radio modulation schemes. The range is spectacular. Just looking at PS-80, it is being received nearly 10 000km away.

<image.png>


To overcome UK restrictions and do a WSPR flight from UK soil, I propose the following steps:
  1.  Acquire an American Amatuer radio licence. It appears to be straight forward according to recent conversations on this group. Launch from the UK and then transmit only when outside UK airspace with US ham licence.
  2. I understand that the balloon should be smaller than a 2m(cube? or sphere?). To comply, I would suggest making a mechanism that rolls up the long 20 meter antenna wires into a spool, that is then unfurled and then dropped off over international waters. Is this a crazy idea?
Or is there a simpler way to do this? Has anyone done it legally from UK soil?

Regards
Medad M7RUF

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "UKHAS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ukhas+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ukhas/CAKuB44R9fiA9RppuCNx9jZ3gM4xzdLS6Pq5A8iavXeNHmHt-mg%40mail.gmail.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "UKHAS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ukhas+un...@googlegroups.com.

John Laidler

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 9:22:21 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
I think if you have a NOTAM issued you could launch a balloon with the antenna already deployed. This would be by far the safest way as the antenna is typically 20m long above the payload and another 20m below it.

The issue of transmission in UK airspace could be overcome by geofencing although given the miniscule power output would anyone notice for the few hours it might be over the UK?

Is the ruling against WSPR something which has been confirmed by OFCOM?  The only discussion I've seen about it made the assumption a WSPR station was an "unmanned beacon" which I find hard to accept as a beacon is something used for direction finding. I can't see an HF WSPR signal, which is almost indistinguishable from the background noise, being used for this purpose. 

John


--

Kevin Walton

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 9:36:33 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
John - A 20m dipole, so 5m above and 5m below - still long, but not *that*
long :)

Cheers
Kev

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, John Laidler wrote:

> I think if you have a NOTAM issued you could launch a balloon with the
> antenna already deployed. This would be by far the safest way as the
> antenna is typically 20m long above the payload and another 20m below it.
>
> The issue of transmission in UK airspace could be overcome by geofencing
> although given the miniscule power output would anyone notice for the few
> hours it might be over the UK?
>
> Is the ruling against WSPR something which has been confirmed by OFCOM?
> The only discussion I've seen about it made the assumption a WSPR station
> was an "unmanned beacon" which I find hard to accept as a beacon is
> something used for direction finding. I can't see an HF WSPR signal, which
> is almost indistinguishable from the background noise, being used for this
> purpose.
>
> John
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 03:13, Medad rufus <medad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Due to the ban in the UK from airborne transmissions on amatuer radio
>> frequencies, it appears that nobody(or very few people) in the UK has
>> attempted a WSPR long range pico balloon flight from UK soil.
>>
>> The benefits of WSPR is unmatched compared to other radio modulation
>> schemes. The range is spectacular. Just looking at PS-80, it is being
>> received nearly 10 000km away.
>>
>> [image: image.png]
>>
>>
>> To overcome UK restrictions and do a WSPR flight from UK soil, I propose
>> the following steps:
>>
>> 1. Acquire an American Amatuer radio licence. It appears to be
>> straight forward according to recent conversations
>> <https://groups.google.com/g/ukhas/c/I2E0dYeZGCQ/m/OSXvG39SAQAJ> on
>> this group. Launch from the UK and then transmit only when outside UK
>> airspace with US ham licence.
>> 2. I understand that the balloon should be smaller than a 2m(cube? or
>> sphere?). To comply, I would suggest making a mechanism that rolls up the
>> long 20 meter antenna wires into a spool, that is then unfurled and then
>> dropped off over international waters. Is this a crazy idea?
>>
>> Or is there a simpler way to do this? Has anyone done it legally from UK
>> soil?
>>
>> Regards
>> Medad M7RUF
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "UKHAS" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ukhas+un...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ukhas/CAKuB44R9fiA9RppuCNx9jZ3gM4xzdLS6Pq5A8iavXeNHmHt-mg%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ukhas/CAKuB44R9fiA9RppuCNx9jZ3gM4xzdLS6Pq5A8iavXeNHmHt-mg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
>

--
Kevin Walton
Mobile: 07867 825 847

Mark Gledhill

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 9:47:30 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
I think where OFCOM are concerned, if it's not explicitly allowed then we can assume it isn't.

While browsing their IR 2030 document a while back I did notice that there are a handful of HF frequencies which appear to be free for airborne use. If a few people could be encouraged to tune their WSPR setups to one of these, (or possibly through the use of a handful of web SDRs) that would give the ability to legally track them in the UK and then use some basic geofencing to shift to the main WSPR frequency once UK airspace is cleared.

Specifically the 13.553 - 13.567 MHz range looks close enough to the 20m band for this to be feasible.

That's assuming I'm interpreting the document correctly of course, and also assuming that you can just tune WSPR to any old frequency and still get spots. I'm no expert in that area.


Mark

Kevin Walton

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 9:59:08 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
Hi Mark

I can confirm that WSPR works on 13.553Mhz.

If decoding with WSJT-X you have to tell it what band you are listening
on, and it only has the standard WSPR bands listed, so the spots get
reported as if they were heard on a standard WSPR frequency.

If listening via the web via a KiwiSDR then the inbuilt decoder wont let
you select 13.553, so you have to pipe the audio back locally to something
like WSJT-X. There is a request logged for the addition of some ISM band
options to the inbuilt decoder.

Finally, quite a few web receivers wont let you tune to 13.553, which is a
pain, but plenty will...

Cheers
Kev
>>> 1. Acquire an American Amatuer radio licence. It appears to be
>>> straight forward according to recent conversations
>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/ukhas/c/I2E0dYeZGCQ/m/OSXvG39SAQAJ> on
>>> this group. Launch from the UK and then transmit only when outside UK
>>> airspace with US ham licence.
>>> 2. I understand that the balloon should be smaller than a 2m(cube? or
>>> sphere?). To comply, I would suggest making a mechanism that rolls up the
>>> long 20 meter antenna wires into a spool, that is then unfurled and then
>>> dropped off over international waters. Is this a crazy idea?
>>>
>>> Or is there a simpler way to do this? Has anyone done it legally from UK
>>> soil?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Medad M7RUF
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "UKHAS" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to ukhas+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ukhas/CAKuB44R9fiA9RppuCNx9jZ3gM4xzdLS6Pq5A8iavXeNHmHt-mg%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ukhas/CAKuB44R9fiA9RppuCNx9jZ3gM4xzdLS6Pq5A8iavXeNHmHt-mg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "UKHAS" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ukhas+un...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ukhas/CAJn3SCrhWcRS_%2BUc%2BJd-PUB94MF71Q6hJvRCKXj8bkiqsb1XFg%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ukhas/CAJn3SCrhWcRS_%2BUc%2BJd-PUB94MF71Q6hJvRCKXj8bkiqsb1XFg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>

Steve

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 11:12:40 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com

Medad,

Re 1) I think you first have to ask a) what does a US ham radio license give you legally and b) which US license class do you need.

With a US license I can't see a problem transmitting over the US or international waters,  but in other countries airspace the only way I can see it being legal is if CEPT or IARP operation is allowed in that country** (and then only if that country allowed airborne operation in its license conditions).

CEPT operation requires the US license holder to have an Extra or Advanced class license and IARP requires Technician Plus, General, Advanced or Extra . I think for IARP you actually need to apply for a permit (the P in IARP) which is valid for about a year.

With just CEPT operation all the gray and yellow parts of this map would be excluded :-

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_radio_international_operation#/media/File:Amateur_Radio_International_Agreements.png

** to be honest even that seems to be a bit of a stretch as the wording is such that it expects the licensee to be present in the country.


Re 2): I think you are talking about the UK 2m “small balloon” rule – to avoid having to get a CAA balloon launch permit. The exact wording from the regulation is:

Small balloon” means a balloon of not more than two metres in any linear dimension at any stage of its flight, including any basket or other equipment attached to the balloon;”

Which to me means that in order to launch in the UK the balloon + antenna system cannot exceed 2m when measured tip to tip at any stage of the flight. BTW: I don't see a problem launching a balloon + HF antenna with a CAA balloon permit.

     Steve G8KHW / AJ4XE

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "UKHAS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ukhas+un...@googlegroups.com.

Steve

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 11:21:02 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com

There are indeed a number of HF frequencies in IR2030 and many are allowed airborne - but you have to find out if that frequency (and power level etc.) is legal over the country your planning to transmit over.

    Steve G8KHW

Steve

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 11:36:27 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com

I cant see any real advantage in using 13.5MHz while over the UK and then swapping to Ham radio WSPR (it's such a small part of the flight) - I can't see how you can use your UK ham radio licence to transmit airborne even in international waters.  You could maybe use it over other countries *if* CEPT allowed you to do that.

    Steve G8KHW

Steve

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 11:41:07 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com

Ah - Bingo - maybe use 13.5MHz while over the UK and international waters licence exempt, and Ham radio WSPR (using your UK licence & CEPT) while over CEPT contries that allow airborne operation.

    Steve G8KHW

Medad rufus

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 11:41:57 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for everyone's input in this,

I got a little mixed up with the Small balloon requirement to ensure the balloon stays within "two metres in any linear dimension". Indeed within a standard weather balloon permission, I can launch a WSPR tracker that well exceeds that size to the antenna. So this is not a problem anymore.

I need to take in all the info about the transmit frequencies etc and will respond soon.

Regards
Medad

Medad rufus

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 11:45:06 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
This is an interesting idea. I have not heard about the small piece of American memorial territory in London. However, it is really close to Heathrow Airport and I think it will not be ideal to launch from there!

Regards
Medad M7RUF

Steve

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 11:45:46 AM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com

Really all the US ham licence will give you (over a UK ham license) is a legal way to transmit ham radio over international waters.

    Steve G8KHW

gw7...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 12:10:06 PM10/23/20
to UKHAS
Do the CEPT rules etc, require the license holder to be physically present in the country where your radio is actually transmitting ? Or is it a requirement that is just ignored ?

And if physical presense in a country is not required, does not the CEPT setup allow you to use the rules applicable for the country the transmitter is in, so in other words if a US licence holder can transmit airborne in the US, why cannot a UK licence holder also transmit airborne in the US ?

Steve

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 1:01:40 PM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com

I personally don't have a view on CEPT one way or the other.  What I would say is if CEPT does not give permission then nothing does and the whole Amateur Radio Pico ballooning thing would probably be technically illegal (which would be a shame).  As you allude I think this angle is just being ignored by most.

What I suspect is if someone were to ask a regulatory body they might well get an answer they (and others) don't want to hear.

Re your Q: "why cannot a UK licence holder also transmit airborne in the US ?"   They can, as I said, (assuming CEPT allows) - the US is a CEPT country that allows airborne operation. 

    Steve G8KHW

M5AKA

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 4:00:48 PM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
Steve,

To operate under the CEPT reciprocal agreement you have to be physically present in the country, operating a remote transmitter like as a balloon is not covered.

73 Trevor M5AKA

Steve

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 5:38:45 PM10/23/20
to 'M5AKA' via UKHAS

Thanks Trevor - I think you said previously,  but from what I read I haven't formed a conclusion either way, but yes, there are certainly requirements that suggest a physical presence in country (presenting documents etc.).  For me personally it makes no difference - I have no plans to fly a Amateur Radio tracked pico flight - so I have no real incentive to wade through the fine detail of the agreement.

If CEPT type operation is not possible I can see no way a Amateur radio based tracker would be legal transmitting above another country.  Happy for someone to correct me and point at the appropriate regulation.   I suggest anyone wanting to use amateur radio for worldwide balloon tracking investigate the legality in detail.

Its also worth pointing out the only international regulation I know about that allows a balloon to cross into the airspace of another country without explicit permission is where the balloon is being used exclusively for meteorological purposes.  I think it would be very difficult to make that case for some (most?) amateur radio flights.

    Steve G8KHW / AJ4XE

Medad rufus

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 5:45:27 PM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
There have been various bastardisations of the WSPR protocol to enable transmission of extra data, which I believe is how VK3YT is sending more accurate positional information. This does require a modified version of WSJT-X to decode.

To be honest, as long as it works, I am willing to go with WSPR++ with various mods. As long as I can track a balloon around the world while there is sunlight to power the tracker, I am fine with it.

Regards
Medad



John Laidler

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 6:06:24 PM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
Balloons using WSPR are floating around the world all the time. No one has been prosecuted. AFAIK and why should they be as the power outputs are tiny and the ether is already full of WSPR transmissions already? I doubt OFCOM would bother to react as what would be the public interest in doing so? If you transmit on the WSPR 20m frequency of 14.0956 MHz it is in a band already allocated for unattended data transmissions. I think it's a case of the regulations not having caught up with the latest technology. 

John

Steve

unread,
Oct 23, 2020, 9:19:34 PM10/23/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com

Well its pretty explicit in the UK licence:

    the Licensee shall not establish or use the Radio Equipment in any Aircraft or other Airborne Vehicle.

and

    “Aircraft” and “Airborne Vehicles” includes full size and models and also includes balloons whether tethered or free;

The latter para was added by OFCOM the last few years just to make it absolutely clear about balloons.

Lets just say due to youthful enthusiasm I ended up in court for a wireless telegraphy act offense - so now I tend to err on the side of caution.

    Steve

Philip Day

unread,
Oct 24, 2020, 7:26:42 PM10/24/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
It isn't that hard to get an Air radio license that Private Pilots use. I wonder if that would solve some, or all of the problems under discussion?

I don't know really anything about the subject, so it could be a bad idea.

Phil

John Laidler

unread,
Oct 24, 2020, 7:51:32 PM10/24/20
to uk...@googlegroups.com
The frequencies are all wrong for WSPR I think. Typically pilots use around 122MHz but WSPR uses much lower HF frequencies. Even if you did use 122MHz I suspect there are rules about using it unattended.

John

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages