Dear Janet and David, and psychotherapists in Scotland
Further to Courtenay’s contribution (key points copied below)
I was, and am, a Yes voter, and very much want Scotland to continue to demand and utilise additional powers and devolved responsibility for its own affairs. Yet I also see that psychotherapy in Scotland is marginalised in so many ways, and Scottish registrants, mostly members of organisations based ‘down south’, need all the help they can get from UKCP to enable further development.
I believe we have to talk about how ‘psychotherapy’ training can be distinguished from ‘counselling’ training. I say this, despite knowing that many ‘counselling’ trainings are as rigorous and as ‘in-depth’, or more so, than some routes to the label ‘psychotherapist’.
I have been raising this on a Linked In thread. It would be really helpful to have a UKCP statement that sets out the threshold requirements in respect of training - components, standards and levels/duration of training - for UKCP registration, that can be used over against that of the generality of ‘counsellor’ trainings. I don’t want to cause dissension, but to begin a conversation, so that we can begin to describe the field across the practice of ‘counselling’, ‘psychotherapeutic counselling’, and ‘psychotherapy’ (and even ‘psychoanalysis’). Then we can begin to talk more sensibly to policymakers and commissioners.
It doesn’t serve clients – the public – to have the overall field described simply as ‘counselling and psychotherapy’, as currently practised by BACP and COSCA (in Scotland) - we need to offer more differentiation if we mean to continue to use the two terms.
This is important in Scotland because ‘counselling’ is not generally, in practice, recognised by the NHS. But equally, there is a shortage of posts for psychotherapists, understood as psychoanalytic psychotherapists. There is, however, a developing need, since many consultant psychotherapists are of retirement age. Much work needs to be done to ensure adequate provision by appropriately-trained practitioners.
Mary MacCallum Sullivan
Courtenay’s key points (my edit)
'I therefore suggest - strongly - that a proportion of UKCP fees (paid by its Scottish members) is retained both (i) for the use and benefit of the Scottish members (to be decided by them) and (ii) that a UKCP Scottish Forum is officially acknowledged and empowered to campaign, support, and put forward issues pertaining to the furtherance of psychotherapy in Scotland (or words to that effect).'