Been looking at getting a new phone and some of the 24-month deals look
very attractive over buying outright. But is there an expensive sting in
the tail?
For example, an iphone 14 128GB is £849 outright.
IDmobile's cheapest deal for the same model is £37.99 pm (£99 upfront
cost) which is £1010 over the 24 months. Factoring in the "value" of the
25GB mobile plan in the deal worth about £8 pm means the cost of the
phone is actually £818 (£1010 - (8*24).
Sounds like a great deal.
However, I've noticed that the annual increases that networks are
allowed to charge without triggering no-fee exit clauses apply to the
*whole deal* which means it applies to the service cost *and* phone
bundle. With the current high rates of inflation means that over two
years you may end up paying significantly more for your phone.
Cost could actually be:
Dec 22 - Mar 23 = 37.99 pm
Apr 23 - Mar 24 = 43.27 pm (CPI 10% + 3.9%) [1]
Apr 24 - Nov 24 = 46.26 pm (CPI 3% + 3.9%) [1]
Sum total = (4*37.99) + (12*43.27) + (8*46.26) + 99 = £1140
£130 more than someone might have calculated. I'll certainly be avoiding
these deals.
Sneaky tactics? Are the telcos doing these deals knowing full well
they're not as cheap as they seem?
It also doesn't seem to be a coincidence that there are no 12 or 18
month deals anymore on the main networks.
[1] CPI predictions are from NIESR:
https://www.niesr.ac.uk/blog/inflation-set-fall-early-2023