Tiscali are sending me e-mails saying I have, however I'm still connected at
2.2Mbps, which is what my connection was showing when I initiall joined up.
Tiscali are convinced that I have upgraded (and are charging me
accordingly), however as my connection speed hasn't changed I'm very
dubious.
Any help would be appreciated greatly.
Thankyou fellow (and fellowesses) broadband users!
Brian.
Cheers,
monkey
Try the speed test at:-
http://www.adslguide.org.uk/tools/speedtest.asp
> Tiscali are sending me e-mails saying I have, however I'm still connected at
> 2.2Mbps, which is what my connection was showing when I initiall joined up.
Seeing as 2.2Mbps has no relation to 256K or 512K I expect it is telling
you something unrelated that you do not need to know! (Like for example
the speed of the connection between your modem and PC - not the speed of
the connection between modem and ISP)
--
Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/
I would try a speedtest to see what sort of download speeds you are
achieving...
> Tiscali are sending me e-mails saying I have, however I'm still connected
at
> 2.2Mbps, which is what my connection was showing when I initiall joined
up.
Hmm - my connection also says that it connects at 2.2Mbps - which it should
as its a 2MB line... so maybe you should just keep quiet!
Regards
Sunil
I had something similar when I used uPnP with my Linksys router originally -
kept saying I had connected to the Internet at some stupidly high Mbps
connection when I had a 64k NTL line!
D
"If only God they knew...if only....."
/me feels a sense of Deja Vu and leaves with a final comment
"yeah a JAVA applet that does something for 30 seconds is a great test...."
Regards
Alex
--
Alexander Clouter <al...@support.metronet.co.uk>
MetroNet Support http://www.metronet.co.uk/support/
comments an isp whos not in the speed results league table but not bad
grapes or anything however if you were in the top ten you may have a
different viewpoint
>"yeah a JAVA applet that does something for 30 seconds is a great test...."
the one you were wetting yourself about in another thread took all of
20s to determine its "superior" results.
Phil
> "yeah a JAVA applet that does something for 30 seconds is a great test...."
I think you will find it is good enough to work out if you are getting
256k or 512K - we are not talking precision here!
However I do take your point, phase of the moon should also be accounted for
too :)
Regards
Alex