Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

TalkTalk News Server

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Keith Willcocks

unread,
Jan 5, 2008, 1:49:41 PM1/5/08
to
I have been toying with the idea of halving my phone/broadband bill by going
to TalkTalk - I know, but I am a low user and have a number of friends who
have gone to them only one of whom had problems, and that was personally
sorted out by Charles Dunstone.

Anyway, the only thing I was concerned about was that I understood they did
not have usenet access and I have been looking at freebie news servers
(Motzarella is favourite at the moment).

The other day, however, I opened a command prompt and typed in Ping
news.talktalk.net and was surprised firstly to see it actually ping
news.opaltelecom.net on 62.24.224.34 and secondly to get a reply.

Today I pinged but the request timed out. Can anyone throw any light on
this please. Do TalkTalk now have a news server (albeit belonging to
Opaltelecom) and do they now provide a usenet facility?
--
Keith Willcocks
(If you can't laugh at life, it ain't worth living!)


Paul Cupis

unread,
Jan 5, 2008, 2:27:56 PM1/5/08
to
Keith Willcocks wrote:
> Today I pinged but the request timed out. Can anyone throw any light on
> this please. Do TalkTalk now have a news server (albeit belonging to
> Opaltelecom) and do they now provide a usenet facility?

As a side-point, TalkTalk's broadband product is actually Opal Telecoms
network - i.e. they are the same company.

HVS

unread,
Jan 5, 2008, 4:15:24 PM1/5/08
to
On 05 Jan 2008, Keith Willcocks wrote

> I have been toying with the idea of halving my phone/broadband
> bill by going to TalkTalk - I know, but I am a low user and have
> a number of friends who have gone to them only one of whom had
> problems, and that was personally sorted out by Charles
> Dunstone.
>
> Anyway, the only thing I was concerned about was that I
> understood they did not have usenet access and I have been
> looking at freebie news servers (Motzarella is favourite at the
> moment).

Can't help with your query, but FWIW I've been using albasani.net as
a free (text) news server for many months now; it seems pretty
good.


--
Cheers,
Harvey

tony h

unread,
Jan 5, 2008, 4:53:12 PM1/5/08
to

"HVS" <use...@REMOVETHISwhhvs.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns9A1CD83C...@news.albasani.net...

> On 05 Jan 2008, Keith Willcocks wrote
>

> Can't help with your query, but FWIW I've been using albasani.net as


> a free (text) news server for many months now; it seems pretty
> good.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Harvey

same here, never known it go down, i use it in preference to my isp's server


Jim Crowther

unread,
Jan 5, 2008, 5:35:39 PM1/5/08
to
In uk.telecom.broadband, on Sat, 5 Jan 2008 21:53:12, tony h wrote:

>
>"HVS" <use...@REMOVETHISwhhvs.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:Xns9A1CD83C...@news.albasani.net...
>> On 05 Jan 2008, Keith Willcocks wrote
>>
>
>> Can't help with your query, but FWIW I've been using albasani.net as
>> a free (text) news server for many months now; it seems pretty
>> good.
>

>same here, never known it go down, i use it in preference to my isp's server

It looks very sensible. What is retention like there? I didn't spot
that specified (or stated as unspecified) on the site.

Their T&Cs look pretty spot-on.

--
Jim Crowther

tony h

unread,
Jan 5, 2008, 6:16:30 PM1/5/08
to

"Jim Crowther" <Don't_bo...@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote in message
news:o2$3kOT7Y...@nospam.at.my.choice.of.UID.invalid...

no idea, sorry


Jim Crowther

unread,
Jan 5, 2008, 6:53:29 PM1/5/08
to
In uk.telecom.broadband, on Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:16:30, tony h wrote:

>
>"Jim Crowther" <Don't_bo...@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote in message
>news:o2$3kOT7Y...@nospam.at.my.choice.of.UID.invalid...

>>


>> --
>> Jim Crowther
>
>no idea, sorry

I hope you are as sorry for quoting sigs. Please don't.

--
Jim Crowther

{{{{{Welcome}}}}}

unread,
Jan 5, 2008, 8:35:27 PM1/5/08
to


I use Motzarella and albasani no problems.

TalkTalk used to have a news-server but it kept falling over, the last time
it fell over a couple of years back or so, they decided they couldn't be
bothered to sort it out.

Hope you have a better time with TalkTalk than I did, worst 2.5 months ever,
glad I managed to escape without charge.

Opal is TalkTalk, CPW bought Opal and then provided TalkTalk broadband.

--
Worried about debt?
http://www.cccs.co.uk

HVS

unread,
Jan 6, 2008, 5:13:38 AM1/6/08
to
On 05 Jan 2008, Jim Crowther wrote

Not sure, but doing a quick check on a couple of busy groups I read,
the oldest retrievables are September/October.

So -- guessing -- 3 months-ish?

--
Cheers,
Harvey

tony h

unread,
Jan 6, 2008, 7:03:44 AM1/6/08
to

"Jim Crowther" <Don't_bo...@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote in message
news:oW$3sqU5h...@nospam.at.my.choice.of.UID.invalid...

extremely, soon as i've finished typing this i'm gonna cut off my hands.
(maybe i missed a bit of ng etiquette?)

ps. just realised, if i cut off one hand i'll have nothing to hold the axe
to do the other, so i'll probably not bother it it's all the same....

;)
My new temporary sig, feel free to copy
-----------------
Two Hand Tony
-----------------


Rich

unread,
Jan 6, 2008, 7:34:52 AM1/6/08
to
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:35:27 GMT, "{{{{{Welcome}}}}}"
<bhx_spam@trapped__hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>Keith Willcocks wrote:

>> Today I pinged but the request timed out. Can anyone throw any
>> light on this please. Do TalkTalk now have a news server (albeit
>> belonging to Opaltelecom) and do they now provide a usenet facility?
>

If you a lite user then why not look into getting an account with

http://www.news.astraweb.com/plans.html

I registered a $10.00 (£5.00) account about 12 months ago for purely
text (no binaries) - I've not even used 5% of the 25 Gig allowance.

Rich

PeeGee

unread,
Jan 6, 2008, 10:21:31 AM1/6/08
to
Is it possible to get Outlook Express to work properly?

--
PeeGee

The reply address is a spam trap. All mail is reported as spam.
"Nothing should be able to load itself onto a computer without the
knowledge or consent of the computer user. Software should also be able
to be removed from a computer easily."
Peter Cullen, Microsoft Chief Privacy Strategist (Computing 18 Aug 05)

Jim Crowther

unread,
Jan 6, 2008, 11:50:32 AM1/6/08
to
In uk.telecom.broadband, on Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:21:31, PeeGee wrote:

>Jim Crowther wrote:
>> In uk.telecom.broadband, on Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:16:30, tony h wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Jim Crowther" <Don't_bo...@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote in
>>>message
>>> news:o2$3kOT7Y...@nospam.at.my.choice.of.UID.invalid...
>>
>>>>
>>>> -- Jim Crowther
>>>
>>> no idea, sorry
>> I hope you are as sorry for quoting sigs. Please don't.
>>
>Is it possible to get Outlook Express to work properly?

OEquotefix makes it behave. :)

http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/

--
Jim Crowther

tony h

unread,
Jan 6, 2008, 2:00:03 PM1/6/08
to

"Jim Crowther" <Don't_bo...@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote in message
news:hUnVskbY...@nospam.at.my.choice.of.UID.invalid...

>>Is it possible to get Outlook Express to work properly?
>
> OEquotefix makes it behave. :)
>
> http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
>
> --

pretty good link, thanks.


Keith Willcocks

unread,
Jan 7, 2008, 3:50:59 PM1/7/08
to

"Keith Willcocks" <bucc...@invalidaddress.inv> wrote in message
news:zcqdnT5bUsPXTOLa...@bt.com...


Thanks for the responses. The fact that they had it but haven't fixed it
explains why I get the occasional Ping response. I shall certainly look
at Albasini. Thanks for the pointer.

0 new messages