Loop test?, line loss?, line length? etc
> Anyone know what the BT Broadband checker does when checking a line
> for BB availability?
>
> Loop test?, line loss?, line length? etc
It just checks a database.
--
My photos: http://homepages.zen.co.uk/~philip.chung
To send me an e-mail, remove TEETH
> "Sutre" <tsda...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in
> news:3fc618c7$1...@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com:
>
>
>>Anyone know what the BT Broadband checker does when checking a line
>>for BB availability?
>>
>>Loop test?, line loss?, line length? etc
>
>
> It just checks a database.
>
So why does my line which has 512 broadband now come up as to far from
the exchange when I use the line checker? Does this mean that I would
have trouble if I changed broadband supplier in the future?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
It's because either the database is incorrect (has been known to
happen) or that your line is actually out of specification, which here
again has been known to happen with self installs.
Has anyone else come up against this one? I have no intention to change
broadband suppliers currently, but I may in the future, what do you
think the outcome would be?
PS the postcode checker still says that I am good to go for up to 2Mb/s !!
[BT DSL line qualifier]
>So why does my line which has 512 broadband now come up as to far from
>the exchange when I use the line checker?
Because it's useless. It relies on voice-line test measurements, which
can easily screw up. I have the same problem: line characteristics are
unchanged from when I had 1M DSL service nine months ago, now 'too far'.
BT's approach to testing is still mostly "suck it and see" because they
won't have automatic line qualification from the exchange end until the
Acterna/Fujitsu contract they signed in August is fulfilled. At present
limited insertion loss testing can be carried out, but borderline cases
still have to be resolved by Network Build with a visit to the premises,
and for tests like APTS the line must be activated first, which makes
the process of testing redundant: if the line works when you activate
it, and you don't have to cover it with an SLA, the logical option is to
take the money while things work and cease the line when they don't.
>Does this mean that I would have trouble if I changed broadband
>supplier in the future?
If you opt for cease and provide and submit a manual order, hopefully
someone would actually test the line properly. Migrate, and your line
doesn't need to be re-tested.
--
James MacDonald
> So why does my line which has 512 broadband now come up as to far from
> the exchange when I use the line checker? Does this mean that I would
> have trouble if I changed broadband supplier in the future?
The database is wrong. It used to say that I've got an incompatible
product on my line. Guess what that product was? ADSL!