Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Draytek Vigor 2760N router slower sync speed

121 views
Skip to first unread message

CD

unread,
Sep 16, 2014, 4:17:51 AM9/16/14
to
Hi all

I'm with Sky & have been using the "Sky Hub" which to be honest worked
just fine. With O2 & their router before the buyout I got a downstream
of around 18500 with about 1500 up. On the Sky hub this has crept up
to over 20000 down.
I obtained a Draytek Vigor 2760N to have continued dynamic dns
support, this is a VDSL router that does ADSL too with a lot of bells
& whistles.
Sync speed was a bit slower, back in the 18000s & has now dropped to
16500.
Putting the Sky one back gets it back up to speed in no time, so this
must be a router issue.

Any ideas?

Thanks

CD

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

Mark

unread,
Sep 16, 2014, 5:12:19 AM9/16/14
to
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:17:51 +0100, CD <n...@way.ok> wrote:

>Hi all
>
>I'm with Sky & have been using the "Sky Hub" which to be honest worked
>just fine. With O2 & their router before the buyout I got a downstream
>of around 18500 with about 1500 up. On the Sky hub this has crept up
>to over 20000 down.
>I obtained a Draytek Vigor 2760N to have continued dynamic dns
>support, this is a VDSL router that does ADSL too with a lot of bells
>& whistles.
>Sync speed was a bit slower, back in the 18000s & has now dropped to
>16500.
>Putting the Sky one back gets it back up to speed in no time, so this
>must be a router issue.

At a guess I'd just say some routers have better modems than others.
--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) If a man stands in a forest and no woman is around
(")_(") is he still wrong?

The Natural Philosopher

unread,
Sep 16, 2014, 8:16:33 AM9/16/14
to
On 16/09/14 09:17, CD wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm with Sky & have been using the "Sky Hub" which to be honest worked
> just fine. With O2 & their router before the buyout I got a downstream
> of around 18500 with about 1500 up. On the Sky hub this has crept up
> to over 20000 down.
> I obtained a Draytek Vigor 2760N to have continued dynamic dns
> support, this is a VDSL router that does ADSL too with a lot of bells
> & whistles.
> Sync speed was a bit slower, back in the 18000s & has now dropped to
> 16500.
> Putting the Sky one back gets it back up to speed in no time, so this
> must be a router issue.
>
> Any ideas?
>

I now have a router which syncs slower, but stays there much better. Its
down to signal to noise margins built in (possibly configurable) on the kit.




> Thanks
>
> CD
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>


--
Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except for the
rare story of which you happen to have first-hand knowledge. – Erwin Knoll

The Natural Philosopher

unread,
Sep 16, 2014, 8:18:25 AM9/16/14
to
On 16/09/14 10:12, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:17:51 +0100, CD <n...@way.ok> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm with Sky & have been using the "Sky Hub" which to be honest worked
>> just fine. With O2 & their router before the buyout I got a downstream
>> of around 18500 with about 1500 up. On the Sky hub this has crept up
>> to over 20000 down.
>> I obtained a Draytek Vigor 2760N to have continued dynamic dns
>> support, this is a VDSL router that does ADSL too with a lot of bells
>> & whistles.
>> Sync speed was a bit slower, back in the 18000s & has now dropped to
>> 16500.
>> Putting the Sky one back gets it back up to speed in no time, so this
>> must be a router issue.
>
> At a guess I'd just say some routers have better modems than others.
>
My experience suggest some routers run their modems at lower SNR ratios
to get better headline speeds at the expense of getting a lot of
retrains and packet corruption.


My defunct billion would allow meto 'add gain' to the chipset to get
anything from slow and solid to fast and flaky.

Mark

unread,
Sep 16, 2014, 8:53:40 AM9/16/14
to
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:18:25 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
<t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>On 16/09/14 10:12, Mark wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:17:51 +0100, CD <n...@way.ok> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> I'm with Sky & have been using the "Sky Hub" which to be honest worked
>>> just fine. With O2 & their router before the buyout I got a downstream
>>> of around 18500 with about 1500 up. On the Sky hub this has crept up
>>> to over 20000 down.
>>> I obtained a Draytek Vigor 2760N to have continued dynamic dns
>>> support, this is a VDSL router that does ADSL too with a lot of bells
>>> & whistles.
>>> Sync speed was a bit slower, back in the 18000s & has now dropped to
>>> 16500.
>>> Putting the Sky one back gets it back up to speed in no time, so this
>>> must be a router issue.
>>
>> At a guess I'd just say some routers have better modems than others.
>>
>My experience suggest some routers run their modems at lower SNR ratios
>to get better headline speeds at the expense of getting a lot of
>retrains and packet corruption.

IIRC modems usually use the target SNR margin given to them by the
DSLAM. Some devices allow you to override it. I certainly saw
different routers connecting at different speeds, but with the same
noise margins, unless they were lying. Higher margins do give greater
stability.

>My defunct billion would allow meto 'add gain' to the chipset to get
>anything from slow and solid to fast and flaky.

I could tweak the SNR on my Netgear ADSL router (with DGteam firmware)
but could not match the speeds from the 2-wire (BT business hub).

The Natural Philosopher

unread,
Sep 16, 2014, 9:06:40 AM9/16/14
to
fastest DSL I got was with the cheapest router. TP-LINK. It was also the
flakiest.

CD

unread,
Sep 16, 2014, 1:55:28 PM9/16/14
to
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:16:33 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
<t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:


>I now have a router which syncs slower, but stays there much better. Its
>down to signal to noise margins built in (possibly configurable) on the kit.

Well, it dropped down to 15400ish, Sky router is back on & I'm using
the changeip homing beacon software to do the updates as I have an
always on server PC in the garage for it to sit on. The Draytek shall
go back to whence it came.

Graham J

unread,
Sep 16, 2014, 2:07:04 PM9/16/14
to
CD wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:16:33 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
> <t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>> I now have a router which syncs slower, but stays there much better. Its
>> down to signal to noise margins built in (possibly configurable) on the kit.
>
> Well, it dropped down to 15400ish, Sky router is back on & I'm using
> the changeip homing beacon software to do the updates as I have an
> always on server PC in the garage for it to sit on. The Draytek shall
> go back to whence it came.

As others have said, this is probably because different routers set
different limits for the data rate versus connection reliability.

Please tell us, for both routers, the:

Downstream sync speed, SNR Margin, Loop Attenuation, error count

Upstream sync speed, SNR Margin, Loop Attenuation, error count.

The Vigor router might only show all these parameters for the downstream
direction.

We might then be able to comment further.

In general, a 20% improvement in download speed will be irrelevant.
Better reliability will be much more useful.

--
Graham J


Message has been deleted

CD

unread,
Sep 17, 2014, 3:47:53 AM9/17/14
to
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:07:04 +0100, Graham J <gra...@invalid.com>
wrote:


>Please tell us, for both routers, the:
>
>Downstream sync speed, SNR Margin, Loop Attenuation, error count
>
>Upstream sync speed, SNR Margin, Loop Attenuation, error count.
>
>The Vigor router might only show all these parameters for the downstream
>direction.

Here's the Sky stats, I'm doing this remotely so can't get the Vigor
stats till later.

Down:
18014 kbps (this will go up over the next few days to high 19/low 20)
Line Attenuation 30.0 dB
Noise Margin 6.6 dB

Nothing for errors I can see I do have collision packets which is
zero.

Up:
1213 kbps (will go up to 15ish)
Line Attenuation 18.2 dB
Noise Margin 8.8 dB

Mark

unread,
Sep 17, 2014, 4:59:28 AM9/17/14
to
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:33:07 +0100, Phil W Lee <ph...@lee-family.me.uk>
wrote:

>CD <n...@way.ok> considered Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:55:28 +0100 the perfect
>time to write:
>
>>On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:16:33 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
>><t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I now have a router which syncs slower, but stays there much better. Its
>>>down to signal to noise margins built in (possibly configurable) on the kit.
>>
>>Well, it dropped down to 15400ish, Sky router is back on & I'm using
>>the changeip homing beacon software to do the updates as I have an
>>always on server PC in the garage for it to sit on. The Draytek shall
>>go back to whence it came.
>>
>Get the Billion BiPAC 8800NL instead.

--snip--

Good value. It's a shame it doesn't have dual-band wifi though but
that's not a real problem.

Has anyone compared it with a Draytek 2860n?

Mike Tomlinson

unread,
Sep 29, 2014, 10:06:12 AM9/29/14
to
In article <1hcg1a5nu6kt5sae5...@4ax.com>, Mark <i@dontget
lotsofspamanymore.invalid> writes

>I could tweak the SNR on my Netgear ADSL router (with DGteam firmware)
>but could not match the speeds from the 2-wire (BT business hub).

Ah, that's interesting, thanks. I'm using a DG834GT with the DGTeam
firmware and the SNR dialled down to 4dB, but have seen the 2-wire
routers at car boot sales for a quid or two. Had been tempted but the
box of used routers I have at home is getting ever fuller...

--
(\_/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
0 new messages