Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Electricity LV mains distribution - questions about CONSAC cables

702 views
Skip to first unread message

steve

unread,
Aug 12, 2002, 5:47:27 AM8/12/02
to
We've been having terrible troubles here in our corner of Chipping Sodbury
with power cuts. It's been going on for at least 2 years, and the typical
failure results in men digging up the road and replacing joints on the LV
(230V) underground cable. The estate was built in the late seventies/early
eighties. I'm given to understand that the most likely cause is that our
underground cabling uses CONSAC cable, which I believe was thought to be a
good idea at the time, but has proved to be unreliable.

Do any of you have any information about this cable, and why it fails at the
joints? I'd be particularly interested to know if any of the failure modes
can result in customer over-voltages/power surges (anecdotal information
from another affected area suggests it can, but I'd be looking for stronger
evidence).

Alternatively, pointers to a more relevant newsgroup would be appreciated.

TIA,

Steve S


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 8/2/02


du...@g4egg.demon.co.uk

unread,
Aug 16, 2002, 10:42:42 AM8/16/02
to
In message <PuL59.18731$C15.16...@news-text.cableinet.net>, steve
<steve...@CutThisBitOff.blueyonder.co.uk> writes

>
>, and the typical
>failure results in men digging up the road and replacing joints on the LV
>(230V) underground cable. The estate was built in the late seventies/early
>eighties. I'm given to understand that the most likely cause is that our
>underground cabling uses CONSAC cable, which I believe was thought to be a
>good idea at the time, but has proved to be unreliable.
>
>
Don't know where you are, which may affect some of the following
comments:
CONSAC LV cable was one of the two main types of aluminium core/sheath
distributor (as opposed to WAVCON) and was introduced because of the
price of copper.
It comprises three cores for the three phases, and the sheath acts as
neutral, earth conductor, and gives mechanical protection.
Because of the conductivity of aluminium, it is a larger diameter then
the copper equivalent, even though there are only three cores.
Main drawback is rather larger bending radii. Also, the dreaded PME had
to be adopted, but that's another story.
The cable itself is reliable enough.

The jointing technique was not consistent throughout the country, and
poor practice took time to correct. (This was worse where contractors
were used: their attitude was sometimes less than satisfactory!)
Because of this, you may be suffering from a greater number of outages
than should be expected.
The joints on the cables in your area can be located and remade, but at
a cost which the supply companies will not meet.
Don't suppose this helps!

--
Wilf, who remembers "PRESS PLAY ON TAPE #1"
(If replying direct, attend to anti-spam insert in
reply to address. To reduce spam, almost all e-mails are
rejected)

0 new messages