Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
British Taxpayers Compelled to Pay Damages to Sudanese Sex Offender
15 views
Skip to first unread message
BurfordTJustice
Nov 14, 2013, 4:35:13 AM11/14/13
to
British Taxpayers Compelled to Pay Damages to Sudanese Sex Offender
Is it really possible that after centuries of greatness, Britons have lost
all trace of it only since World War II? We'll know for sure if they fail to
rise up in outrage against this:
A foreign criminal jailed for sex offences against schoolgirls is to
receive damages after a court ruled he had been held for too long while
ministers tried to kick him out of Britain.
The 25-year-old man from Sudan, known as 'JS', was handed a four-year
sentence in 2008 after luring 13 and 14-year-old schoolgirls to a house for
sex but he remained behind bars when his sentence came to an end.
After his sentence ended, authorities held onto him while they tried to get
him deported. However,
He claimed he could not be deported because he was a member of the
persecuted Zaghawa tribe from Darfur.
His family were subjected to intolerable treatment by the majority
population of the area, he said.
Whereas subjecting British children to rape by Third World savages, and
making British taxpayers finance it, is evidently tolerable, according to
those with the final say in these matters.
JS arrived in the UK in November 2004, hidden in the back of a lorry. Then
apparently aged 16, the immigration authorities immediately discovered his
presence in the UK and he claimed asylum.
The claim was rejected in January 2005 on the basis that it was 'vague,
unsubstantiated and lacking in detail'.
But the rejection made no difference. He will no doubt remain in Britain,
sponging off taxpayers and probably molesting children, until the day he
dies.
No government that fails to defend its country from invasion can be regarded
as legitimate.
Is it really possible that after centuries of greatness, Britons have lost
all trace of it only since World War II? We'll know for sure if they fail to
rise up in outrage against this:
A foreign criminal jailed for sex offences against schoolgirls is to
receive damages after a court ruled he had been held for too long while
ministers tried to kick him out of Britain.
The 25-year-old man from Sudan, known as 'JS', was handed a four-year
sentence in 2008 after luring 13 and 14-year-old schoolgirls to a house for
sex but he remained behind bars when his sentence came to an end.
After his sentence ended, authorities held onto him while they tried to get
him deported. However,
He claimed he could not be deported because he was a member of the
persecuted Zaghawa tribe from Darfur.
His family were subjected to intolerable treatment by the majority
population of the area, he said.
Whereas subjecting British children to rape by Third World savages, and
making British taxpayers finance it, is evidently tolerable, according to
those with the final say in these matters.
JS arrived in the UK in November 2004, hidden in the back of a lorry. Then
apparently aged 16, the immigration authorities immediately discovered his
presence in the UK and he claimed asylum.
The claim was rejected in January 2005 on the basis that it was 'vague,
unsubstantiated and lacking in detail'.
But the rejection made no difference. He will no doubt remain in Britain,
sponging off taxpayers and probably molesting children, until the day he
dies.
No government that fails to defend its country from invasion can be regarded
as legitimate.
0 new messages